scholarly journals A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: Implications for the recognition of speech in noise

2010 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 943-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy J. Brown ◽  
Robert T. Ferry ◽  
Ray Meddis
1997 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Hill ◽  
Deepak K. Prasher ◽  
Linda M. Luxon

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Robertson ◽  
Guy J. Brown ◽  
Wendy Lecluyse ◽  
Manasa Panda ◽  
Christine M. Tan

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
Robert Moore ◽  
Susan Gordon-Hickey

The purpose of this article is to propose 4 dimensions for consideration in hearing aid fittings and 4 tests to evaluate those dimensions. The 4 dimensions and tests are (a) working memory, evaluated by the Revised Speech Perception in Noise test (Bilger, Nuetzel, & Rabinowitz, 1984); (b) performance in noise, evaluated by the Quick Speech in Noise test (QSIN; Killion, Niquette, Gudmundsen, Revit, & Banerjee, 2004); (c) acceptance of noise, evaluated by the Acceptable Noise Level test (ANL; Nabelek, Tucker, & Letowski, 1991); and (d) performance versus perception, evaluated by the Perceptual–Performance test (PPT; Saunders & Cienkowski, 2002). The authors discuss the 4 dimensions and tests in the context of improving the quality of hearing aid fittings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document