Acoustic parameter estimates and confidence intervals for gravel at low frequencies.

2009 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 2296
Author(s):  
Michael J. White ◽  
George W. Swenson ◽  
Todd A. Borrowman ◽  
George Z. Gertner
2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 985-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Lu ◽  
James M. Bailey

Background Many pharmacologic studies record data as binary yes-or-no variables, and analysis is performed using logistic regression. This study investigates the accuracy of estimation of the drug concentration associated with a 50% probability of drug effect (C50) and the term describing the steepness of the concentration-effect relation (gamma). Methods The authors developed a technique for simulating pharmacodynamic studies with binary yes-or-no responses. Simulations were conducted assuming either that each data point was derived from the same patient or that data were pooled from multiple patients in a population with log-normal distributions of C50 and gamma. Coefficients of variation were calculated. The authors also determined the percentage of simulations in which the 95% confidence intervals contained the true parameter value. Results The coefficient of variation of parameter estimates decreased with increasing n and gamma. The 95% confidence intervals for C50 estimation contained the true parameter value in more than 90% of the simulations. However, the 95% confidence intervals of gamma did not contain the true value in a substantial number of simulations of data from multiple patients. Conclusion The coefficient of variation of parameter estimates may be as large as 40-50% for small studies (n < or = 20). The 95% confidence intervals of C50 almost always contain the true value, underscoring the need for always reporting confidence intervals. However, when data from multiple patients is naively pooled, the estimates of gamma may be biased, and the 95% confidence intervals may not contain the true value.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 746-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon W. Cheung ◽  
Rebecca S. Lau

Currently, the most popular analytical method for testing moderated mediation is the regression approach, which is based on observed variables and assumes no measurement error. It is generally acknowledged that measurement errors result in biased estimates of regression coefficients. What has drawn relatively less attention is that the confidence intervals produced by regression are also biased when the variables are measured with errors. Therefore, we extend the latent moderated structural equations (LMS) method—which corrects for measurement errors when estimating latent interaction effects—to the study of the moderated mediation of latent variables. Simulations were conducted to compare the regression approach and the LMS approach. The results show that the LMS method produces accurate estimated effects and confidence intervals. By contrast, regression not only substantially underestimates the effects but also produces inaccurate confidence intervals. It is likely that the statistically significant moderated mediation effects that have been reported in previous studies using regression include biased estimated effects and confidence intervals that do not include the true values.


2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 1184-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taciana Villela Savian ◽  
Joel Augusto Muniz ◽  
Luiz Henrique de Aquino ◽  
Vera Lúcia Banys ◽  
Daniel Furtado Ferreira

The objective of this work was to fit the degradation model proposed by Orskov & McDonald (1979) to data of an in situ degradability trial. Neutral detergent fiber degradations (NDF) of coast cross grass (Cynodon dactylon x Cynodon nlemfunensis) were submitted to twelve cutting ages (30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330 and 360 days) in a complete block design. At each cutting age, NDF degradation was investigated using nine incubation times (0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours) in a split-plot design, taking cutting age as main plots and incubation time as subplots. Each plot comprised a non-lactating cow with a permanent ruminal fistula. Variances of the parameter estimates were also obtained, as well as expressions for the estimation of confidence intervals for parameters in the model. A good fit of the model to the data of neutral detergent fiber degradability in the most cutting ages was found. The cutting ages of the coast cross grass influenced the degradability of different fractions, benefiting early stages. In advanced cutting ages the parameters estimates were less precise.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 3120
Author(s):  
Sandro Amador ◽  
Mahmoud El-Kafafy ◽  
Álvaro Cunha ◽  
Rune Brincker

Recently, a lot of efforts have been devoted to developing more precise Modal Parameter Estimation (MPE) techniques. This is explained by the necessity in civil, mechanical and aerospace engineering of obtaining accurate estimates for the modal parameters of the tested structures, as well as of determining reliable confidence intervals for these estimates. The Non-linear Least Squares (NLS) identification techniques based on Maximum Likelihood (ML) have been increasingly used in modal analysis to improve precision of estimates provided by the Least Squares (LS) based estimators when they are not accurate enough. Apart from providing more accurate estimates, the main advantage of the ML estimators, with regard to their LS counterparts, is that they allow for taking into account not only the measured Frequency Response Functions (FRFs) but also the noise information during the parametric identification process and, therefore, provide the modal parameters estimates together with their uncertainties bounds. In this paper, a new derivation of a Maximum Likelihood Estimator formulated in Pole-residue Modal Model (MLE-PMM) is presented. The proposed formulation is meant to be used in combination with the Least Squares Frequency Domain (LSCF) to improve the precision of the modal parameter estimates and compute their confidence intervals. Aiming at demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed approach, it is applied to two simulated examples in the final part of the paper.


Psihologija ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-488
Author(s):  
Milica Popovic-Stijacic ◽  
Ljiljana Mihic ◽  
Dusica Filipovic-Djurdjevic

We compared three statistical analyses over binary outcomes. As applying ANOVA over proportions violates at least two classical assumptions of linear models, two alternatives are described: the binary logistic regression and the mixed logit model. Firstly, we compared the effects obtained by the three methods over the same data from a previous memory research. All three methods gave similar results: the effects of the tasks and the number of sensory modalities were observed, but not their interaction. Secondly, by using the bootstrap estimates of the parameters, the efficacy of each method was explored. As predicted, the bootstrap parameter estimates of the ANOVA had large bias and standard errors, and consequently wide confidence intervals. On the other hand, the bootstrap parameter estimates of the binary logistic regression and the mixed logit models were similar ? both had low bias and standard errors and narrow confidence intervals.


Author(s):  
Russell Cheng

This chapter examines methods that overcome a difficulty with infinite likelihoods. In shifted threshold distributions where the PDF has the form f(y) ∼ k(b,c)(y−a)c−1, if y tends to the threshold parameter a, then the log-likelihood tends to infinity if c < 1 and a also tends to y(1) the smallest observation. The maximum likelihood (ML) method fails in this case, yielding parameter estimates that are not consistent. A method is described overcoming this problem, called the maximum product of spacings method. This yields parameter estimates with the same consistency and asymptotic normality properties as ML estimators when these exist, and which yield, when c < 1 where ML fails, consistent estimates with that for a hyper-efficient. Confidence intervals for a are difficult to obtain theoretically when c < 2. A method is given using percentiles of the stable law distribution and this is numerically compared with bootstrap confidence intervals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document