Benchmark problems for acoustic scattering from elastic objects in the free field and near the seafloor

2009 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Zampolli ◽  
Finn B. Jensen ◽  
Alessandra Tesei
Keyword(s):  
Free Field ◽  
Acoustic Scattering ◽  
Benchmark Problems

Numerical analysis of kinematic response of single piles

2000 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1368-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J Bentley ◽  
M Hesham El Naggar
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Time History ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Soil Parameters ◽  
Nonlinear Behaviour ◽  
Pile Head ◽  
Element Mesh ◽  
Single Piles

Recent destructive earthquakes have highlighted the need for increased research into the revamping of design codes and building regulations to prevent further catastrophic losses in terms of human life and economic assets. The present study investigated the response of single piles to kinematic seismic loading using the three-dimensional finite element program ANSYS. The objectives of this study were (i) to develop a finite element model that can accurately model the kinematic soil–structure interaction of piles, accounting for the nonlinear behaviour of the soil, discontinuity conditions at the pile–soil interface, energy dissipation, and wave propagation; and (ii) to use the developed model to evaluate the kinematic interaction effects on the pile response with respect to the input ground motion. The static performance of the model was verified against exact available solutions for benchmark problems including piles in elastic and elastoplastic soils. The geostatic stresses were accounted for and radiating boundaries were provided to replicate actual field conditions. Earthquake excitation with a low predominant frequency was applied as an acceleration–time history at the base bedrock of the finite element mesh. To evaluate the effects of the kinematic loading, the responses of both the free-field soil (with no piles) and the pile head were compared. It was found that the effect of the response of piles in elastic soil was slightly amplified in terms of accelerations and Fourier amplitudes. However, for elastoplastic soil with separation allowed, the pile head response closely resembled the free-field response to the low-frequency seismic excitation and the range of pile and soil parameters considered in this study.Key words: numerical modelling, dynamic, lateral, piles, kinematic, seismic.

Acoustic scattering from free field and buried spherical shells

1990 ◽  
Vol 88 (S1) ◽  
pp. S131-S131
Author(s):  
Joseph L. Lopes ◽  
Douglas G. Todoroff
Keyword(s):  
Free Field ◽  
Acoustic Scattering ◽  
Spherical Shells

scholarly journals Prediction of Sound Scattering from Deep-Sea Targets Based on Equivalence of Directional Point Sources

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 5160
Author(s):  
Jinpeng Liu ◽  
Zheng Zhu ◽  
Yongqiang Ji ◽  
Ziyang Chen ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Point Source ◽  
Deep Sea ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Acoustic Scattering ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Elastic Structure ◽  
Theoretical Modelling ◽  
Sound Scattering ◽  
Scattering Field

A fast prediction method is proposed for calculating the sound scattering of targets in the deep-sea acoustic channel by equating the sound scattering field of a complex elastic target to the acoustic field excited by a directional point source. In deep-sea conditions, the effects of the sea surface on the impedance characteristics of the elastic target surface can be ignored. Through the finite element simulation of the acoustic scattering of the target in the free field, the sound scattering field is equated to the radiation field of a directional point source. Subsequently, the point source is placed in the channel, and the acoustic ray method is used to calculate the distribution of the scattering field. On the basis of theoretical modelling, the method of obtaining the directional point source and the influence of the sea surface on the impedance of the scattering field are analysed. Subsequently, the proposed method is compared with the finite element method in terms of computational efficiency. The result shows that the method considers the multiple complex coupling effects between the elastic structure and marine environment. The influence of the boundary is approximately negligible when the distance from the ocean boundary to the elastic structure is equal to the wavelength. The method only performs finite element coupling calculation in the free field; the amount of mesh size is greatly reduced and the calculation efficiency is significantly improved when compared with the finite element calculation in the entire channel, the. The calculation time in the example can be reduced by more than one order of magnitude. This method organically combines the near-field calculation with acoustic ray theory and it can realise the rapid calculation of the large-scale acoustic scattering field in complex marine environments.

The Effect of Nonlinear Amplitude Growth on the Speech Perception Benefits Provided by a Single-Sided Vocoder

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 745-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica M. Wess ◽  
Joshua G. W. Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Transfer Functions ◽  
Spatial Configuration ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Spatial Separation ◽  
Compression And Expansion ◽  
Interaural Difference ◽  
Interaural Differences ◽  
Single Sided Deafness ◽  
Perceptual Separation ◽  
Loudness Growth

PurposeFor listeners with single-sided deafness, a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech understanding by giving the listener access to the ear with the better target-to-masker ratio (TMR; head shadow) or by providing interaural difference cues to facilitate the perceptual separation of concurrent talkers (squelch). CI simulations presented to listeners with normal hearing examined how these benefits could be affected by interaural differences in loudness growth in a speech-on-speech masking task.MethodExperiment 1 examined a target–masker spatial configuration where the vocoded ear had a poorer TMR than the nonvocoded ear. Experiment 2 examined the reverse configuration. Generic head-related transfer functions simulated free-field listening. Compression or expansion was applied independently to each vocoder channel (power-law exponents: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 2).ResultsCompression reduced the benefit provided by the vocoder ear in both experiments. There was some evidence that expansion increased squelch in Experiment 1 but reduced the benefit in Experiment 2 where the vocoder ear provided a combination of head-shadow and squelch benefits.ConclusionsThe effects of compression and expansion are interpreted in terms of envelope distortion and changes in the vocoded-ear TMR (for head shadow) or changes in perceived target–masker spatial separation (for squelch). The compression parameter is a candidate for clinical optimization to improve single-sided deafness CI outcomes.

Underlying Structure of Auditory-Visual Consonant Perception by Hearing-Impaired Children and the Influences of Syllabic Compression

1988 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Busby ◽  
Y. C. Tong ◽  
G. M. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Acoustic Parameter ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Visual Signal ◽  
Underlying Structure ◽  
Choice Procedure ◽  
Release Times ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

The identification of consonants in a/-C-/a/nonsense syllables, using a fourteen-alternative forced-choice procedure, was examined in 4 profoundly hearing-impaired children under five conditions: audition alone using hearing aids in free-field (A),vision alone (V), auditory-visual using hearing aids in free-field (AV1), auditory-visual with linear amplification (AV2), and auditory-visual with syllabic compression (AV3). In the AV2 and AV3 conditions, acoustic signals were binaurally presented by magnetic or acoustic coupling to the subjects' hearing aids. The syllabic compressor had a compression ratio of 10:1, and attack and release times were 1.2 ms and 60 ms. The confusion matrices were subjected to two analysis methods: hierarchical clustering and information transmission analysis using articulatory features. The same general conclusions were drawn on the basis of results obtained from either analysis method. The results indicated better performance in the V condition than in the A condition. In the three AV conditions, the subjects predominately combined the acoustic parameter of voicing with the visual signal. No consistent differences were recorded across the three AV conditions. Syllabic compression did not, therefore, appear to have a significant influence on AV perception for these children. A high degree of subject variability was recorded for the A and three AV conditions, but not for the V condition.

Human Event-Related Potentials to Higher-Order Acoustic Spatial Changes

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Ruusuvirta ◽  
Heikki Hämäläinen
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Mismatch Negativity ◽  
Spatial Information ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Event Related Potentials ◽  
Negative Polarity ◽  
Positive Polarity ◽  
Spatial Changes ◽  
Related Potentials ◽  
Human Event

Abstract Human event-related potentials (ERPs) to a tone continuously alternating between its two spatial loci of origin (middle-standards, left-standards), to repetitions of left-standards (oddball-deviants), and to the tones originally representing these repetitions presented alone (alone-deviants) were recorded in free-field conditions. During the recordings (Fz, Cz, Pz, M1, and M2 referenced to nose), the subjects watched a silent movie. Oddball-deviants elicited a spatially diffuse two-peaked deflection of positive polarity. It differed from a deflection elicited by left-standards and commenced earlier than a prominent deflection of negative polarity (N1) elicited by alone-deviants. The results are discussed in the context of the mismatch negativity (MMN) and previous findings of dissociation between spatial and non-spatial information in auditory working memory.

Spatial audio displays for speech communications: A comparison of free field and virtual acoustic environments

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Todd Nelson ◽  
Robert S. Bolia ◽  
Mark A. Ericson ◽  
Richard L. McKinley
Keyword(s):  
Free Field ◽  
Spatial Audio ◽  
Acoustic Environments
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document