scholarly journals Doppler-shift compensation behavior by Wagner’s mustached bat,Pteronotus personatus

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 4331-4339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Smotherman ◽  
Antonio Guillén-Servent
1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1613-1623 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Riquimaroux ◽  
S. J. Gaioni ◽  
N. Suga

1. The Jamaican mustached bat uses a biosonar signal (pulse) with eight major components: four harmonics each consisting of a long constant frequency (CF1-4) component followed by a short frequency-modulated (FM1-4) component. While flying, the bat adjusts the frequency of its pulse so as to maintain the CF2 of the Doppler-shifted echo at a frequency to which its cochlea is very sharply tuned. This Doppler shift (DS) compensation likely is mediated or influenced by the Doppler-shifted CF (DSCF) processing area of the primary auditory cortex, which only represents frequencies in the range of echo CF2s (60.6 to 62.3 kHz when the "resting" frequency of the CF2 is 61.0 kHz). 2. We trained four bats to discriminate between different trains of paired tone bursts that mimicked a bat's pulse CF2 and the accompanying echo CF2. The frequency of these CF2s ranged between 61.0 and 64.0 kHz. A discriminated shock avoidance procedure response was employed using a leg flexion. For one stimulus, the S+, the pulse and echo CF2s were the same frequency (delta f = 0, i.e., no Doppler shift). A leg flexion during the S+ turned off both the S+ and the scheduled shock. For a second stimulus, the S-, the echo CF2 was 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 2.0 kHz higher than the pulse CF2. A delta f of 0.05 kHz was a frequency difference of 0.08%. No shock followed the S-, and leg flexions had no consequences. Correct responses consisted of a leg flexion during the S+ and no flexion during the S-; these responses were added together to compute the percentage of correct responses. When a bat correctly responded at better than 75% for all the delta f s, muscimol, a potent agonist of gamma-aminobutyric acid, was bilaterally applied to inactivate the DSCF area. Performance on each delta f discrimination was then measured. 3. Initial attempts to condition the bats to flex their legs to the CF tones mimicking part of the natural pulses and echoes failed. When broad-band noise bursts were substituted, however, the conditioned response was rapidly established. The noise band-width was gradually reduced and then replaced with the CF tones. Discrimination training with the tone burst trains then commenced. Throughout this procedure, the bats maintained their responding to the stimuli. The bats typically required approximately 20-30 sessions to perform consistently (> or = 75% correct responses) a discrimination involving a 2 kHz delta f.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


1994 ◽  
Vol 188 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
A W Keating ◽  
O W Henson ◽  
M M Henson ◽  
W C Lancaster ◽  
D H Xie

Quantitative data for Doppler-shift compensation by Pteronotus parnellii parnellii were obtained with a device which propelled the bats at constant velocities over a distance of 12 m. The bats compensated for Doppler shifts at all velocities tested (0.1-5.0 ms-1). The main findings were (1) that compensation was usually accomplished by a progressive lowering of the approximately 61 kHz second harmonic constant-frequency component of emitted sounds in small frequency steps (93 +/- 72 Hz); (2) that the time needed to reach a steady compensation level averaged 514 +/- 230 ms and the number of pulses required to reach full compensation averaged 10.78 +/- 5.16; (3) that the animals compensated to hold the echo (reference) frequency at a value that was slightly higher than the resting frequency and slightly lower than the cochlear resonance frequency; (4) that reference frequency varied as a function of velocity, the higher the velocity of the animal, the higher was the reference frequency (slope 55 Hz m-1s-2); and (5) that the mean reference frequency was always an undercompensation. The average amount of undercompensation was 15.8%. There was a significant difference (P < or = 0.005) in Doppler-shift compensation data collected at velocities that differed by 0.1 ms-1. A velocity difference of 0.1 ms-1 corresponds to a Doppler-shift difference of about 35 Hz in the approximately 61 kHz signals reaching the ear.


1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1254-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Olsen ◽  
N. Suga

1. Orientation sounds (pulses) emitted by the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii) consist of up to four harmonics (H1-4); each harmonic contains a constant frequency (CF) component and a terminal frequency modulated (FM) component, so that there are eight components in total (CF1-4 and FM1-4). By referring the echo from a target to the emitted pulse, the mustached bat derives velocity information from Doppler shift and distance information from echo delay. In this study, the responses of single neurons in the medial geniculate body (MGB) to synthetic biosonar signals were investigated. Stimuli consisted of CF, FM, and CF-FM sounds. Paired CF-FM sounds were used to mimic any two harmonics of pulse-echo pairs. The dorsal and medial divisions of the MGB were found to contain combination-sensitive neurons. These neurons responded poorly to individual sounds regardless of frequency and amplitude and were facilitated by paired sounds presented at particular frequencies, amplitudes and inter-component intervals (simulated echo delay). Combination-sensitive neurons were tuned to the frequencies that characterize particular components of natural biosonar signals and were classified according to the components of pulse-echo pairs that best matched the spectral selectivity of the neuron. Two classes of combination-sensitive neurons were found, CF/CF and FM-FM. This paper focuses on CF/CF combination-sensitive neurons, which extract velocity information from paired CF components, and on CF2 and CF3 neurons, which, although not combination-sensitive, are tuned to the frequencies of the CF2 and CF3 components of biosonar signals. 2. CF2 and CF3 neurons were sharply tuned in frequency. The best frequencies of the most sharply tuned CF2 neurons were all approximately equal to 61.17 kHz (SD = 370 Hz), which closely matches the frequency at which P. parnellii stabilizes the CF2 component of an echo when compensating for Doppler shift. Thus CF2 neurons are specialized for a fine analysis of Doppler-compensated echoes. 3. Tuning curves of CF2 and CF3 neurons remained narrow regardless of stimulus level. When compared at high stimulus levels (30 and 50 dB above minimum threshold), bandwidths of tuning curves of CF2 and CF3 neurons were much smaller than those of peripheral auditory neurons turned to CF2 or CF3 frequencies but were about the same as those of cortical neurons tuned to CF2 or CF3 frequencies. Thus the sharpening of neural tuning curves by the bat's central auditory system occurs within or before the MGB.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 2274-2290 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Vater ◽  
M. Kössl ◽  
E. Foeller ◽  
F. Coro ◽  
E. Mora ◽  
...  

Adult mustached bats employ Doppler-sensitive sonar to hunt fluttering prey insects in acoustically cluttered habitats. The echolocation call consists of 4–5 harmonics, each composed of a long constant frequency (CF) component flanked by brief frequency modulations (FM). The 2nd harmonic CF component (CF2) at 61 kHz is the most intense, and analyzed by an exceptionally sharply tuned auditory system. The maturation of echolocation calls and the development of Doppler-shift compensation was studied in Cuba where large maternity colonies are found in hot caves. In the 1st postnatal week, infant bats did not echolocate spontaneously but could be induced to vocalize CF-FM signals by passive body motion. The CF2 frequency emitted by the smallest specimens was at 48 kHz (i.e., 0.4 octaves lower than the adult signal). CF-FM signals were spontaneously produced in the 2nd postnatal week at a CF2 frequency of 52 kHz. The CF2 frequencies of induced and spontaneous calls shifted upward to reach a value of 60.5 kHz in the 5th postnatal week. Standard deviations of CF2 frequency were large (up to ±1.5 kHz) in the youngest bats and dropped to values of ±250 Hz at the end of the 3rd postnatal week. Some individuals in the 4th and 5th postnatal weeks emitted with adultlike frequency precision of about ±100 Hz. In the youngest bats, the 1st harmonic CF component (CF1) was up to 22 dB stronger than CF2. Adultlike relative levels of CF1 (–28 dB relative to CF2) were reached in the 5th postnatal week. In spontaneously emitted CF-FM calls, the duration of the CF2 component gradually increased with age from 5 ms to maximum values of 18 ms. Durations of the CF2 component in induced calls averaged 7 ± 2.6 ms in the 1st postnatal week and 8.2 ± 1.5 ms in the 5th postnatal week. There were no age-related changes in duration of the terminal FM sweep (3 ± 0.4 ms) in both induced and spontaneous calls. The magnitude of the terminal FM sweep in spontaneous calls was not correlated with age (mean 13.5 ± 2 kHz). Values for induced calls slightly increased with age from 11 ± 2 to 13 ± 2 kHz. The emission rate of induced CF-FM signals increased with age from values of 2.5 ± 2 to 17 ± 5 pulses/s. Values for spontaneously emitted calls were 4.4 ± 3 and 9 ± 4.5 pulses/s, respectively. Doppler-shift compensation, as tested in the pendulum task, emerged during the 4th postnatal week in young bats that were capable of very brief active flights, but before the time of active foraging outside the cave.


2002 ◽  
Vol 205 (11) ◽  
pp. 1607-1616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Metzner ◽  
Shuyi Zhang ◽  
Michael Smotherman

SUMMARY Among mammals, echolocation in bats illustrates the vital role of proper audio-vocal feedback control particularly well. Bats adjust the temporal,spectral and intensity parameters of their echolocation calls depending on the characteristics of the returning echo signal. The mechanism of audio-vocal integration in both mammals and birds is, however, still largely unknown. Here, we present behavioral evidence suggesting a novel audio-vocal control mechanism in echolocating horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). These bats compensate for even subtle frequency shifts in the echo caused by flight-induced Doppler effects by adjusting the frequency of their echolocation calls. Under natural conditions, when approaching background targets, the bats usually encounter only positive Doppler shifts. Hence, we commonly believed that, during this Doppler-shift compensation behavior,horseshoe bats use auditory feedback to compensate only for these increases in echo frequency (=positive shifts) by actively lowering their call frequency below the resting frequency (the call frequency emitted when not flying and not experiencing Doppler shifts). Re-investigation of the Doppler-shift compensation behavior, however, shows that decreasing echo frequencies(=negative shifts) are involved as well: auditory feedback from frequencies below the resting frequency, when presented at similar suprathreshold intensity levels as higher echo frequencies, cause the bat's call frequency to increase above the resting frequency. However, compensation for negative shifts is less complete than for positive shifts (22% versus 95%),probably because of biomechanical restrictions in the larynx of bats. Therefore, Doppler-shift compensation behavior involves a quite different neural substrate and audio-vocal control mechanism from those previously assumed. The behavioral results are no longer consistent with solely inhibitory feedback originating from frequencies above the resting frequency. Instead, we propose that auditory feedback follows an antagonistic push/pull principle, with inhibitory feedback lowering and excitatory feedback increasing call frequencies. While the behavioral significance of an active compensation for echo frequencies below RF remains unclear, these behavioral results are crucial for determining the neural implementation of audio-vocal feedback control in horseshoe bats and possibly in mammals in general.


1989 ◽  
Vol 146 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Suga

For auditory imaging, a bat emits orientation sounds (pulses) and listens to echoes. The parameters characterizing a pulse-echo pair each convey particular types of biosonar information. For example, a Doppler shift (a difference in frequency between an emitted pulse and its echo) carries velocity information. For a 61-kHz sound, a 1.0-kHz Doppler shift corresponds to 2.8 ms-1 velocity. The delay of the echo from the pulse conveys distance (range) information. A 1.0-ms echo delay corresponds to a target distance of 17 cm. The auditory system of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnelli, from Central America solves the computational problems in analyzing these parameters by creating maps in the cerebral cortex. The pulse of the mustached bat is complex. It consists of four harmonics, each of which contains a long constant-frequency (CF) component and a short frequency-modulated (FM) component. Therefore, there are eight components in the emitted pulse (CF1-4 and FM1-4). The CF signal is particularly suited for target velocity measurement, whereas the FM signal is suited for target distance measurement. Since the eight components differ from each other in frequency, they are analyzed in parallel at different regions of the basilar membrane in the inner ear. Then, they are separately coded by primary auditory neurons and are sent up to the auditory cortex through several auditory nuclei. During the ascent of the signals through these auditory nuclei, neurons responding to the FM components process range information, while other neurons responding to the CF components process velocity information. A comparison of the data obtained from the mustached bat with those obtained from other species illustrates both the specialized neural mechanisms specific to the bat's auditory system, and the general neural mechanisms which are probably shared with many different types of animals.


2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 814-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Smotherman ◽  
Walter Metzner

Echolocating horseshoe bats respond to flight-speed induced shifts in echo frequency by adjusting the frequency of subsequent calls. Under natural conditions, Doppler effects may force the frequency of a returning echo several kilohertz above the original emission frequency. By lowering subsequent call frequencies, the bat can return echo frequencies to within a narrow spectral bandwidth to which its highly specialized auditory system is most sensitive. While Doppler-shift compensation (DSC) behavior specifically refers to frequency compensation, other parameters of the returning echo, such as delay, duration, and interaural time and intensity differences have been shown to influence DSC performance. Understanding the nature of these influences has already led to a better appreciation of the neurophysiology of DSC. Here we provide a quantitative analysis of the effects of a prominent feature of the returning echo, its intensity, on DSC performance in horseshoe bats. Although DSC performance generally tolerates echo attenuation up to approximately 40 dB relative to the outgoing emission intensity, a systematic decline in DSC performance can be observed over this range. Generally, the effects of echo attenuation are characterized by a reduction in 1) the overall amount of compensation relative to the size of the shift in echo frequency and 2) the rate at which the bat responds to perceived echo shifts. These effects appear to be the consequence of a systematic shift in the range of echo frequencies capable of inducing DSC behavior. In particular, the reference frequency (the minimum shift in echo frequency that will elicit DSC behavior) appears to be highly sensitive to echo intensity. Every 10-dB reduction in echo intensity shifts the reference upward nearly 250 Hz. Our results indicate that, even at the highest intensity levels, relatively minor changes in echo intensity critically influence frequency compensation during normal DSC. We conclude with a discussion of how these results might impact echolocation behavior of horseshoe bats under natural and experimental conditions.


1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. DRAKES ◽  
R. HIERS ◽  
R. REED

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document