Shear wave velocity in surfictal marine sediments: A comparison of in situ and laboratory measurements

1988 ◽  
Vol 83 (S1) ◽  
pp. S78-S78
Author(s):  
Michael D. Richardson ◽  
Enrico Muzi ◽  
Luigi Troiano
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Marine Sediments ◽  
Shear Wave Velocity ◽  
Laboratory Measurements

SHEAR‐WAVE VELOCITY VERSUS DEPTH IN MARINE SEDIMENTS: A REVIEW

Geophysics ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 985-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin L. Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Marine Sediments ◽  
Shear Wave Velocity ◽  
Shear Waves ◽  
Shear Velocity ◽  
Velocity Versus ◽  
Velocity Data ◽  
Velocity Gradients

The objectives of this paper are to review and study selected measurements of the velocity of shear waves at various depths in some principal types of unlithified, water‐saturated sediments, and to discuss probable variations of shear velocity as a function of pressure and depth in the sea floor. Because of the lack of data for the full range of marine sediments, data from measurements on land were used, and the study was confined to the two “end‐member” sediment types (sand and silt‐clays) and turbidites. The shear velocity data in sands included 29 selected in‐situ measurements at depths to 12 m. The regression equation for these data is: [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is shear‐wave velocity in m/sec, and D is depth in meters. The data from field and laboratory studies indicate that shear‐wave velocity is proportional to the 1/3 to 1/6 power of pressure or depth in sands; that the 1/6 power is not reached until very high pressures are applied; and that in most sand bodies the velocity of shear waves is proportional to the 3/10 to 1/4 power of depth or pressure. The use of a depth exponent of 0.25 is recommended for prediction of shear velocity versus depth in sands. The shear velocity data in silt‐clays and turbidites include 47 selected in‐situ measurements at depths to 650 m. Three linear equations are used to characterize the data. The equation for the 0 to 40 m interval [Formula: see text] indicates the gradient [Formula: see text] to be 4 to 5 times greater than is the compressional velocity gradient in this interval in comparable sediments. At deeper depths, shear velocity gradients are [Formula: see text] from 40 to 120 m, and [Formula: see text] from 120 to 650 m. These deeper gradients are comparable to those of compressional wave velocities. These shear velocity gradients can be used as a basis for predicting shear velocity versus depth.

Soil Liquefaction Evaluation of Offshore Site Based on In Situ Shear Wave Velocity Measurements

2013 ◽  
Vol 405-408 ◽  
pp. 470-473
Author(s):  
Sheng Jie Di ◽  
Ming Yuan Wang ◽  
Zhi Gang Shan ◽  
Hai Bo Jia
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Shear Wave Velocity ◽  
Wind Farm ◽  
Soil Liquefaction ◽  
Offshore Wind ◽  
Velocity Measurements ◽  
Liquefaction Resistance ◽  
Liquefaction Potential

A procedure for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils based on the shear wave velocity measurements is outlined in the paper. The procedure follows the general formal of the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure. In addition, it was developed following suggestions from industry, researchers, and practitioners. The procedure correctly predicts moderate to high liquefaction potential for over 95% of the liquefaction case histories. The case study for the site of offshore wind farm in Jiangsu province is provided to illustrate the application of the proposed procedure. The feature of the soils and the shear wave velocity in-situ tested in site are discussed and the liquefaction potential of the layer is evaluated. The application shows that the layers of the non-cohesive soils in the depths 3-11m may be liquefiable according to the procedure.

scholarly journals CHARACTERIZING A TROPICAL SOIL VIA SEISMIC IN SITU TESTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Breno Padovezi Rocha ◽  
Heraldo Luiz Giacheti
Keyword(s):  
Shear Modulus ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Shear Wave Velocity ◽  
Soil Profile ◽  
Site Investigation ◽  
Tropical Soil ◽  
Engineering Properties ◽  
Foundation Engineering

ABSTRACT. The shear wave velocity (Vs) is an important geotechnical parameter to be used in dynamic problems (e.g. earthquakes and vibration problems) as well as in static deformation analysis such as excavations and foundation engineering design. There are several in situ seismic tests to determine Vs such as the crosshole and the downhole techniques, as well as hybrid tests (e.g. seismic dilatometer – SDMT). This paper presents crosshole, downhole and SDMT tests carried out in a typical tropical soil profile from Brazil. Advantages and limitations regarding the test procedures and interpretation are briefly presented and differences observed among Vs determined by these techniques are discussed. Shear wave velocities (Vs) estimated from the crosshole, downhole and SDMT tests ranging from 194 to 370 m/s. The shear wave velocity suggests that the experimental site could be divided into two strata, which are in agreement with soil profile description. The maximum shear modulus (G0) calculated from the Vs by theory of elasticity can be used to show the investigated tropical soil is a typical unusual geomaterial. This article also emphasizes that the SDMT is a useful test for site investigation since it allows a great means for profiling geostratigraphy and soil engineering properties during routine site investigation as well as for dynamics problems. Keywords: shear wave velocity, maximum shear modulus, crosshole, downhole, SDMT.RESUMO. A velocidade de onda cisalhante (Vs) é um parâmetro geotécnico empregado em análises dinâmicas (terremotos e problemas de vibração), bem como em análises estáticas (escavações e projeto de fundações). Existem vários ensaios sísmicos de campo para a determinação de Vs, entre eles as técnicas crosshole e downhole, e os ensaios híbridos (por exemplo, dilatômetro sísmico – SDMT). Este artigo apresenta os ensaios crosshole, downhole e SDMT realizados em um perfil típico de solo tropical do Brasil, as vantagens e limitações dos procedimentos de ensaio e de interpretação são brevemente apresentadas, e as diferenças observadas entre os valores de Vs determinados pelas diferentes técnicas são discutidas. Os perfis de Vs determinados pelas diferentes técnicas variaram de 194 a 370 m/s. A velocidade da onda cisalhante sugere que o campo experimental investigado pode ser dividido em dois horizontes, os quais estão de acordo com a descrição do perfil do solo estudado. O módulo de cisalhamento máximo (G0), calculado a partir de Vs pela teoria da elasticidade, pode ser utilizado para demonstrar o comportamento não convencional do solo investigado. Este artigo também enfatiza que o SDMT é um ensaio geotécnico útil para a investigação geotécnica do subsolo, uma vez que permite a definição do perfil estratigráfico e a estimativa de parâmetros estáticos e dinâmicos de um projeto.Palavras-chave: velocidade de onda cisalhante, módulo de cisalhamento máximo, crosshole, downhole, SDMT.

Critical Insights in Laboratory Shear Wave Velocity Correlations of Clays

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dania Elbeggo ◽  
Yannic Ethier ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Dubé ◽  
Mourad Karray
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Shear Wave Velocity ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Dynamic Parameter ◽  
Clay Deposits ◽  
Sample Disturbance ◽  
P Rat

Shear wave velocity is an important mechanical/dynamic parameter allowing the characterization of a soil in the elastic range (γ < 0.001 %). Thirty five existing laboratory correlations of small strains shear modulus or shear wave velocity were examined in this study and are grouped into different general forms based on their geotechnical properties. A database of 11 eastern Canadian clay deposits was selected and used for the critical insights. The effect of the coefficient of earth pressure at rest was also examined. A range of variation for each general form of correlation was determined to take the plasticity index and void ratio values of investigated sites into account. The analysis shows a significant scatter in normalized shear wave velocity values predicted by existing correlations and raises questions on the applicability of these correlations, especially for eastern Canadian clays. New correlations are proposed for Champlain clays based on laboratory measurement of shear wave velocity using the piezoelectric ring actuator technique, P-RAT, incorporated in consolidation cells. An analysis of P-RAT results reveals the sample disturbance effect and suggests an approach to correct the effect of disturbance on laboratory shear wave velocity measurements. The applicability of the proposed correlations, including the disturbance correction, is validated by comparison with in situ measurements using multi-modal analysis of surface waves (MMASW).

In Situ Shear-Wave Velocity Assessment at the Delaney Park Downhole Array, Anchorage, Alaska

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 3381-3390
Author(s):  
Hai-Yun Wang ◽  
Wei-Ping Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Shear Wave Velocity ◽  
Great Influence ◽  
Standard Penetration Test ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Downhole Array

Abstract The shear-wave velocity (VS) in soil is an important parameter to characterize dynamic soil properties. The Delaney Park downhole array was deployed in 2003 without measuring the shear- and compression-wave velocity (VS and VP) profiles. Thornley et al. (2019) measured the VS and VP profiles using the downhole method after the sensor was removed from the 61 m borehole with casing in the array. However, the waves propagating along the casing wall may have a great influence on the recognition of the first arrival of waves propagating in the soil. Using horizontal and vertical components of weak-motion data of eight local earthquakes recorded by the array, in situ VS and VP profiles were assessed by the seismic interferometry based on deconvolution, respectively. The results are as follows. The VS and VP profiles computed by this study and measured by Thornley et al. (2019) are in relatively good agreement at a depth of 10–45 m and at a depth of 30–45 m, respectively, and in very poor agreement at other depths. The average VS profiles computed by this study are more consistent with the derived VS from the standard penetration test data at the site with slower near-surface velocities relative to the downhole logging analysis. There are strong anisotropy in the strata below 45 m and weak anisotropy with various degrees at various depths in the strata above 45 m.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document