scholarly journals Acoustic wave interactions at a mean‐flow stagnation point

1987 ◽  
Vol 82 (S1) ◽  
pp. S78-S78
Author(s):  
Charles Thompson ◽  
Martin Manley
Keyword(s):  
Acoustic Wave ◽  
Stagnation Point ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Wave Interactions ◽  
Flow Stagnation

scholarly journals Nonlinear Saturation of Vertically Propagating Rossby Waves

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 915-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantine Giannitsis ◽  
Richard S. Lindzen
Keyword(s):  
Wave Propagation ◽  
Channel Model ◽  
Plane Channel ◽  
Nonlinear Flow ◽  
Computational Domain ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Wave Interactions ◽  
Linear Solution ◽  
Wave Growth ◽  
Flow Interactions

Abstract The interaction between vertical Rossby wave propagation and wave breaking is studied in the idealized context of a beta-plane channel model. Considering the problem of propagation through a uniform zonal flow in an exponentially stratified fluid, where linear theory predicts exponential wave growth with height, the question is how wave growth is limited in the nonlinear flow. Using a numerical model, the authors examine the behavior of the flow as the bottom forcing increases through values bound to lead to a breakdown of the linear solution within the computational domain. Focusing on the equilibrium flow obtained for each value of the bottom forcing, an attempt is made to identify the mechanisms involved in limiting wave growth and examine in particular the importance of wave–wave interactions. The authors also examine the case in which forcing is continuously increasing with time so as to enhance effects peculiar to transiency; it does not significantly alter the main results. Wave–mean flow interactions are found to dominate the dynamics even for strong bottom forcing values. Ultimately, it is the modification of the mean flow that is found to limit the vertical penetration of the forced wave, through either increased wave absorption or downward reflection. Linear propagation theory is found to capture the wave structure surprisingly well, even when the total flow is highly deformed. Overall, the numerical results seem to suggest that wave–wave interactions do not have a strong direct effect on the propagating disturbance. Wave–mean flow interactions limit wave growth sufficiently that a strong additional nonlinear enstrophy sink, through downscale cascade, is not necessary. Quantitatively, however, wave–wave interactions, primarily among the lowest wavenumbers, prove important so as to sufficiently accurately determine the basic state and its influence on wave propagation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document