scholarly journals Short‐latency evoked response correlations of psychophysical phenomena: Preliminary results from forward masking studies

1977 ◽  
Vol 62 (S1) ◽  
pp. S86-S87
Author(s):  
R. R. Stanny ◽  
L. F. Elfner
1987 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalini Arehole ◽  
Richard J. Salvi ◽  
Samuel S. Saunders ◽  
Roger P. Hamernik

1985 ◽  
Vol 77 (S1) ◽  
pp. S65-S65
Author(s):  
Shalini Arehole ◽  
Richard J. Salvi ◽  
Samuel S. Saunders ◽  
Roger P. Hamernik

1991 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Elidan ◽  
Mordechai Sela ◽  
Efraim Liebner ◽  
Haim Sohmer

1989 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalini Arehole ◽  
Richard J. Salvi ◽  
Samuel S. Saunders ◽  
Michael Anne Gratton

1976 ◽  
Vol 230 (5) ◽  
pp. 1314-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Berger ◽  
RA Mitchell

We stimulated electrically pharyngeal branch of both glossopharyngeal nerves (PGLN), internal branch of superior laryngeal nerves (ISLN), and carotid sinus nerves (CSN) in anesthetized cats. We recorded simultaneously, averaged, and compared bilaterally evoked phrenic nerve (PHR) activity. Our objective was to demonstrate a short-latency evoked response in the PHR contralateral to the stimulus. Low-intensity stimulation of PGLN and ISLN during inspiration evoked a short-latency contralateral excitation with a latency of 5.2 ms +/- 0.2 SE (16 cats) for PGLN, and 3.8 ms +/- 0.1 SE (13 cats) for ISLN. This excitation could follow stimuli delivered at 100 Hz. Stimulation during expiration did not result in a lateralized excitation. The excitation is followed by bilateral inhibition. Neither strychnine nor picrotoxin prevented either the lateralized response or the inhibition, though strychnine diminished a delayed bilateral excitation following PGLN stimulation. This dalayed (latency 18.7 ms +/- 0.7 SE) bilateral excitation corresponds to the sniff reflex. CSN stimulation did not result in lateralized excitation. We suggest that the lateralized evoked response results from a gated paucisynaptic reflex pathway involving the PGLN and ISLN, ipsilateral inspiratory neurons, and contralateral PHR motoneurons.


1993 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Arias ◽  
C.A. Curet ◽  
H.F. Moyano ◽  
S. Joekes ◽  
N. Blanch

This article describes an assessment of the peripheral and central auditory functioning of eight blind subjects who were good obstacle detectors and eight sighted subjects. An echolocation paradigm in short latency-evoked response was included. The study found that the blind subjects were better (faster) than the sighted subjects in auditory processing and that the echolocation signals may be processed in the superior olivary complex of the midbrain.


1965 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 725-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Truman E. Mast

The human average evoked response to clicks, recorded from almost any position on the scalp, shows a characteristic short-latency component with its peak at 30 msec. These responses are probably composite, originating partly from muscle and partly from brain. The response recorded from parietal (Pl) to vertex (Cz) differs significantly from a known muscular response from the inion. The 30-msec component from inion is markedly enhanced by contraction of the posterior neck muscles, while that from Pl-Cz is little affected. The two responses differ in their relations of amplitude to stimulus intensity. The Pl-Cz response also differs from temporalis and frontalis muscle responses. muscle response to clicks; sources of evoked responses Submitted on October 15, 1964


1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalini Arehole ◽  
Richard J. Salvi ◽  
Samuel S. Saunders ◽  
Don Henderson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document