Changing the Order of Newton's Laws—Why & How the Third Law Should be First

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 406-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Stocklmayer ◽  
John P. Rayner ◽  
Michael M. Gore
Keyword(s):  
2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 713-735
Author(s):  
A F Antippa

Newton's three laws of motion are unified into one law (a slightly modified second law), valid in generalized inertial frames (defined by a slightly modified first law), invariant under mass scaling (guaranteed by the third law), and having important implications for the concept of force and the problem of self-energy. PACS Nos.: 45.20.Dd, 45.50.Jf, 45.05.+x


1968 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roderick W. Home

Most modern analysts of Newton's laws of motion, whether they have approached the subject from a historical or from a philosophical viewpoint, have tended to concentrate on the status of the first two laws; the third law has largely been overlooked, or else it has been dismissed as somehow less interesting. My purpose in this paper is to reverse this approach—I intend to investigate some of the historical aspects of the third law, particularly the empirical background to Newton's statement of it, and in so doing, I intend to skirt most of the questions which have been raised concerning the status of the other two laws. In concentrating on the historical aspects of the third law, I shall also by-pass Mach's controversial re-interpretation of its role in mechanics, for while Mach saw the law as the basis for an operational definition of “mass”, it is quite clear that Newton did not so regard it. On the contrary, Newton seems to have regarded all three of his laws as straightforward statements of fact about the world, so that a knowledge of the factual background to the laws is a fundamental pre-requisite to an understanding of Newton's thought.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Fullybright

Accurate quantification of biological resistance has been impossible so far. Among the various forms of biological resistance which exist in nature, pathogen resistance to drugs is a familiar one. However, as in the case of other forms of resistance, accurately quantifying drug resistance in pathogens has been impossible up to now. Here, we introduce a mathematically-defined and uniform procedure for the absolute quantification of biological resistance deployed by any living organism in the biological realm, including and beyond drug resistance in medicine. The scheme introduced makes possible the exact measurement or computation of the extent to which resistance is deployed by any living organism regardless of kingdom and regardless of the mechanism of resistance involved. Furthermore, the Second Law of Resistance indicating that resistance has the potential to increase to infinite levels, and the Third Law of Resistance indicating that resistance comes to an end once interaction stops, the resistance unit function introduced here is fully compatible with both the Second and Third Laws of Resistance.


Author(s):  
Dennis Sherwood ◽  
Paul Dalby

The Third Law was introduced in Chapter 9; this chapter develops the Third Law more fully, introducing absolute entropies, and examining how adiabatic demagnetisation can be used to approach the absolute zero of temperature.


1942 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 287-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Cross ◽  
Hartley C. Eckstrom

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masao Morishita ◽  
Hiroki Houshiyama
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document