Bound states of a uniform spherical charge distribution—revisited!

2000 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 640-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Tiburzi ◽  
Barry R. Holstein
2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (7) ◽  
pp. 773-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Buchmann

We show that the non-spherical charge distribution of the proton manifests itself in hydrogen hyperfine splitting as an increase (in absolute value) of the proton Zemach radius and polarization contributions.


1960 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 570-579
Author(s):  
L. Favella ◽  
E. Predazzi

1990 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey B. Weinrach ◽  
Kay L. Carter ◽  
Dennis W. Bennett ◽  
H. Keith McDowell

1982 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ohba ◽  
Y. Saito ◽  
S. Wakoh

1988 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 129-132
Author(s):  
K.L. Baluja ◽  
K. Butler ◽  
J. Le Bourlot ◽  
C.J. Zeippen

SummaryUsing sophisticated computer programs and elaborate physical models, accurate radiative and collisional atomic data of astrophysical interest have been or are being calculated. The cases treated include radiative transitions between bound states in the 2p4and 2s2p5configurations of many ions in the oxygen isoelectronic sequence, the photoionisation of the ground state of neutral iron, the electron impact excitation of the fine-structure forbidden transitions within the 3p3ground configuration of CℓIII, Ar IV and K V, and the mass-production of radiative data for ions in the oxygen and fluorine isoelectronic sequences, as part of the international Opacity Project.


Author(s):  
J. Taft∅

It is well known that for reflections corresponding to large interplanar spacings (i.e., sin θ/λ small), the electron scattering amplitude, f, is sensitive to the ionicity and to the charge distribution around the atoms. We have used this in order to obtain information about the charge distribution in FeTi, which is a candidate for storage of hydrogen. Our goal is to study the changes in electron distribution in the presence of hydrogen, and also the ionicity of hydrogen in metals, but so far our study has been limited to pure FeTi. FeTi has the CsCl structure and thus Fe and Ti scatter with a phase difference of π into the 100-ref lections. Because Fe (Z = 26) is higher in the periodic system than Ti (Z = 22), an immediate “guess” would be that Fe has a larger scattering amplitude than Ti. However, relativistic Hartree-Fock calculations show that the opposite is the case for the 100-reflection. An explanation for this may be sought in the stronger localization of the d-electrons of the first row transition elements when moving to the right in the periodic table. The tabulated difference between fTi (100) and ffe (100) is small, however, and based on the values of the scattering amplitude for isolated atoms, the kinematical intensity of the 100-reflection is only 5.10-4 of the intensity of the 200-reflection.


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu.O. Klymenko ◽  
◽  
О.К. Cheremnykh ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document