Comment on “Phase space integration method for bound states” by Sharada Nagabhushana, B. A. Kagali, and Sivramkrishna Vijay [Am. J. Phys. 65 (6), 563–564 (1997)]

1998 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 541-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. N. Mei
1997 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharada Nagabhushana ◽  
B. A. Kagali ◽  
Sivramkrishna Vijay

1992 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 6842-6849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Berblinger ◽  
Christoph Schlier ◽  
Jonathan Tennyson ◽  
Steven Miller

1996 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 503-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
PH. BLANCHARD ◽  
J. STUBBE

Properties of bound states for Schrödinger operators are reviewed. These include: bounds on the number of bound states and on the moments of the energy levels, existence and nonexistence of bound states, phase space bounds and semi-classical results, the special case of central potentials, and applications of these bounds in quantum mechanics of many particle systems and dynamical systems. For the phase space bounds relevant to these applications we improve the explicit constants.


1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.M. Mueller ◽  
J.W. Garland ◽  
M.H. Cohen ◽  
K.H. Bennemann

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Klimek ◽  
Maxim Perelstein

Monte Carlo methods are widely used in particle physics to integrate and sample probability distributions on phase space. We present an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm optimized for this task, and apply it to several examples of relevance for particle physics, including situations with non-trivial features such as sharp resonances and soft/collinear enhancements. Excellent performance has been demonstrated, with the trained ANN achieving unweighting efficiencies between 30% – 75%. In contrast to traditional algorithms, the ANN-based approach does not require that the phase space coordinates be aligned with resonant or other features in the cross section.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document