Electron beam central axis depth dose measurements

1985 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Kirby ◽  
Robert J. Gastorf ◽  
William F. Hanson ◽  
Lawrence W. Berkley ◽  
William F. Gagnon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Central Axis ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Dose Measurements

Derivation of electron and photon energy spectra from electron beam central axis depth dose curves

2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1429-1449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Deng ◽  
Steve B Jiang ◽  
Todd Pawlicki ◽  
Jinsheng Li ◽  
C-M Ma
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Photon Energy ◽  
Central Axis ◽  
Energy Spectra ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Electron And Photon

Effect of Air Space on Depth Dose in Electron Beam Therapy

Radiology ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 249-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiz M. Khan ◽  
Wilfred Sewchand ◽  
Seymour H. Levitt
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Beam Therapy ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Air Space

scholarly journals Dosimetric Characterization of Small Radiotherapy Electron Beams Collimated by Circular Applicators with the New Microsilicon Detector

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 600
Author(s):  
Serenella Russo ◽  
Silvia Bettarini ◽  
Barbara Grilli Leonulli ◽  
Marco Esposito ◽  
Paolo Alpi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Field Size ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Linear Accelerators ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Dosimetric Data ◽  
Output Factors ◽  
Dose Measurements

High-energy small electron beams, generated by linear accelerators, are used for radiotherapy of localized superficial tumours. The aim of the present study is to assess the dosimetric performance under small radiation therapy electron beams of the novel PTW microSilicon detector compared to other available dosimeters. Relative dose measurements of circular fields with 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm aperture diameters were performed for electron beams generated by an Elekta Synergy linac, with energy between 4 and 12 MeV. Percentage depth dose, transverse profiles, and output factors, normalized to the 10 × 10 cm2 reference field, were measured. All dosimetric data were collected in a PTW MP3 motorized water phantom, at SSD of 100 cm, by using the novel PTW microSilicon detector. The PTW diode E and the PTW microDiamond were also used in all beam apertures for benchmarking. Data for the biggest field size were also measured by the PTW Advanced Markus ionization chamber. Measurements performed by the microSilicon are in good agreement with the reference values for all the tubular applicators and beam energies within the stated uncertainties. This confirms the reliability of the microSilicon detector for relative dosimetry of small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by circular applicators.

scholarly journals Commissioning Measurements of Electron Beam Using Montecarlo Algorithm on Truebeam STx® and Compariaon with Clinac iX Linear Accelerator

2021 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 01041
Author(s):  
Kamal Saidi ◽  
Redouane El Baydaoui ◽  
Hanae El Gouach ◽  
Othmane Kaanouch ◽  
Mohamed Reda Mesradi
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
Measured Data ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Water Phantom ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
International University ◽  
The Absolute

TrueBeam STx latest generation linear accelerators (linacs) installed at Sheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. The aim of this is to present and compare the result of the Electron commissioning measurement on TrueBeam Stx and clinac iX installed at Sheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. A compariaon of eMC calculations and measurements for TrueBeam Stx were evaluated. Dosimetric parameters are systematically measured using a large water phantom 3D scanning system MP3 Water Phantom (PTW, Freiburg, Germany). The data of the electron beams commissioning including depth dose curves for each applicator, depth dose curves without applicator and the profile in air for a large field size 40x 40cm2, and the Absolute Dose (cGy/MU) for each applicator. All the data were examined and compared for five electron beams (E6MeV, E9MeV, E12MeV, E16MeV and E20MeV) of Varian’s TrueBeam STx and Clinac iX machines. A comparison, between measurement PDDs and calculated by the Eclipse electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm were performed to validate Truebeam Stx commissioning. All this measurements were performed with a Roos and Markus plane parallel chamber. Our measured data indicated that electron beam PDDs from the TrueBeam Stx machine are well matched to those from our Varian Clinac iX machine. Significant differences between TrueBeam and Clinac iX were found in in‐air profiles and open field output. Maximum depth dose for the TrueBeam Stx and Clinac iX for the following energies (6, 9, 12, 16, 20 MeV) are respectively (1.15; 1.89; 2.6; 3.1; and 2.35) and (1.24; 1.95; 2.70; 2.99 and 2.4cm). For the TrueBeam Stx and Clinac iX the quality index R50 for applicator 15x15 cm2 are in the tolerance intervals. Surface dose increases by increasing energy for both machines. The Absolute Dose (cGy/MU) calibrated for both machine in Dmax at 1cGy/MU for the reference field size cone 15x15 cm2. Bremsstrahlung tail Rp per energy levels as follows for the TrueBeam Stx : 6 MeV – 2.85 cm, 9 MeV – 4.28 cm, 12 MeV – 5.97 cm, 16 MeV – 7.88 cm and 20 MeV – 9.86 cm. and for the Clinac iX : 6 MeV – 2.86 cm, 9 MeV – 4.32 cm, 12 MeV – 5.96 cm, 16 MeV – 7.93 cm and 20 MeV – 10.08 cm. A good agreement between modeled and measured data is observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document