SU-G-IeP1-03: Comparing Arterial Input Function Measurements in DCE-MRI Using MOLLI and Phase

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6Part25) ◽  
pp. 3644-3644
Author(s):  
N Majtenyi ◽  
H Gabrani-Juma ◽  
R Klein ◽  
RA deKemp ◽  
G Cron ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (16) ◽  
pp. 4871-4883 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Heisen ◽  
X Fan ◽  
J Buurman ◽  
N A W van Riel ◽  
G S Karczmar ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6Part3) ◽  
pp. 3615-3616 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Onxley ◽  
D Yoo ◽  
N Muradyan ◽  
J MacFall ◽  
D Brizel ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Yankeelov ◽  
Jeffrey J. Luci ◽  
Martin Lepage ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Laura Debusk ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e115667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido H. Jajamovich ◽  
Claudia Calcagno ◽  
Hadrien A. Dyvorne ◽  
Henry Rusinek ◽  
Bachir Taouli

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Jui Liu ◽  
Hou-Ting Yang ◽  
Melissa Min-Szu Yao ◽  
Shao-Chieh Lin ◽  
Der-Yang Cho ◽  
...  

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 36.9 years; 5 men) using a 1.5-T scanner. The pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans, ve, and vp, derived using a Tofts model on axial DCE-MRI of the lumbar vertebrae, were evaluated using various AIFs: the population-based aortic AIF (AIF_PA), a patient-specific aortic AIF (AIF_A) and a patient-specific segmental arterial AIF (AIF_SA). Additionally, peaks and delay times were changed to simulate the effects of various AIFs on the calculation of perfusion parameters. Nonparametric analyses including the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Kruskal–Wallis test with a Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc analysis were performed. In simulation, Ktrans and ve increased as the peak in the AIF decreased, but vp increased when delay time in the AIF increased. In humans, the estimated Ktrans and ve were significantly smaller using AIF_A compared to AIF_SA no matter the computation style (pixel-wise or region-of-interest based). Both these perfusion parameters were significantly greater using AIF_SA compared to AIF_A.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document