SU-G-BRB-12: Polarity Effects in Small Volume Ionization Chambers in Small Fields

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6Part24) ◽  
pp. 3633-3633
Author(s):  
V Arora ◽  
D Mathew ◽  
S Tanny ◽  
E Parsai ◽  
N Sperling
2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6Part22) ◽  
pp. 3479-3479
Author(s):  
Y Xu ◽  
J Bhatnagar ◽  
M Saiful Huq

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (17) ◽  
pp. 5637-5650 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Le Roy ◽  
L de Carlan ◽  
F Delaunay ◽  
M Donois ◽  
P Fournier ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ileana Silvestre Patallo ◽  
Rebecca Carter ◽  
David Maughan ◽  
Andrew Nisbet ◽  
Giuseppe Schettino ◽  
...  

Abstract Image-guided small animal irradiation platforms deliver small radiation fields in the medium energy x-ray range. Commissioning of such platforms, followed by dosimetric verification of treatment planning, are mostly performed with radiochromic film. There is a need for independent measurement methods, traceable to primary standards, with the added advantage of immediacy in obtaining results. This investigation characterizes a small volume ionization chamber in medium energy x-rays for reference dosimetry in preclinical irradiation research platforms. The detector was exposed to a set of reference x-ray beams (0.5 to 4 mm Cu HVL). Leakage, reproducibility, linearity, response to detector’s orientation, dose rate, and energy dependence were determined for a 3D PinPoint ionization chamber (PTW 31022). Polarity and ion recombination were also studied. Absorbed doses at 2 cm depth were compared, derived either by applying the experimentally determined cross-calibration coefficient at a typical small animal radiation platform “user’s” quality (0.84 mm Cu HVL) or by interpolation from air kerma calibration coefficients in a set of reference beam qualities. In the range of reference x-ray beams, correction for ion recombination was less than 0.1%. The largest polarity correction was 1.4% (for 4 mm Cu HVL). Calibration and correction factors were experimentally determined. Measurements of absorbed dose with the PTW 31022, in conditions different from reference were successfully compared to measurements with a secondary standard ionization chamber. The implementation of an End-to-End test for delivery of image-targeted small field plans resulted in differences smaller than 3% between measured and treatment planning calculated doses. The investigation of the properties and response of a PTW 31022 small volume ionization chamber in medium energy x-rays and small fields can contribute to improve measurement uncertainties evaluation for reference and relative dosimetry of small fields delivered by preclinical irradiators while maintaining the traceability chain to primary standards.


2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Fiorino ◽  
P Mangili ◽  
G.M Cattaneo ◽  
R Calandrino

Author(s):  
Ann‐Britt Schönfeld ◽  
Karl Mund ◽  
Guanghua Yan ◽  
Andreas Alexander Schönfeld ◽  
Hui Khee Looe ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 4901-4907
Author(s):  
Ehab A. Hegazy

Many radiotherapy centers don’t pay attention to effect of ionization champers type on accuracy of quality control measurements. They use any available ionization champers in all quality control and data entry measurements (1,2) . Many studies were carried out in this field to compare different ionization champers in small fields but large fields were not completely compared before (3.4).  The aim of this work is to compare   output factor in large field using two different sizes ionization champers connected to electrometer. Final out put were obtained from the farmer and smidflex dosimeter irradiated with 6 MV photon beams. Important field side ranging from 20 cm to 70 cm side field is measured in whole body radiation (5, 6). For all examined large  field sizes a difference ranging from 1% to 5 % was found when added to other calibration errors it will exceeds the acceptable margin. The largest difference was found in field side 70 cm this may be due to large scattering radiation


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document