SU-E-T-700: Single Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Intact Left Breast Cancer Patients with Internal Mammary (IM) and Supraclavicular (S/C) Nodes - a Treatment Planning Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6Part23) ◽  
pp. 3497-3498 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Lee ◽  
O Algan ◽  
V Keeling ◽  
C Higby ◽  
S Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Planning Study ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Internal Mammary ◽  
Single Isocenter

Which simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique is dosimetrically superior in the treatment of breast cancer; volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or fixed field (ff) IMRT?

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-279
Author(s):  
Steven B. D. Murphy ◽  
Heather Drury-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Fixed Field ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Concomitant Boost ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Integrated Boost

AbstractBackground and purposeTo determine which concomitant boost technique is dosimetrically superior in the treatment of breast cancer; volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or fixed field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ff-IMRT).Materials and methodsIn total, 30 breast patients were re-planned with both VMAT and fixed field concomitant boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. A hybrid technique was used delivering 80% of the dose through tangential beams and 20% through an integrated boost. A two-tailed t-test sample for means was used to compare the dosimetric differences between the techniques.ResultsMaximum dose was statistically lower for VMAT; 103·2 versus 103·7% for ff-IMRT along with statistically lower V2 Gy doses to the contralateral lung (0·7 versus 1·6%) and heart for both left- (19·0%/22·6%), and right- (5·5%/8·8%) sided patients, respectively. ff-IMRT boasted significantly lower ipsilateral lung V20, V18 and V10 Gy (7·9/8·6/13·1 versus 8·1/8·8/13·4%) than VMAT, respectively. No differences were found with minimum coverage, mean dose and V5 Gy to all organs at risk (OARs).ConclusionVMAT and ff-IMRT techniques demonstrate excellent target coverage and OAR sparing facilitated by the hybrid planning technique and deep inspiration breath hold. There is no obvious dosimetrically superior option between the two techniques. Reduced treatment times with VMAT make it more desirable to implement clinically.

Is 5 mm breath-hold window (BHW) sufficient to treat carcinoma left breast patients post-conservative surgery: a comparative study using forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Karthikeyan Kalyanasundaram ◽  
Subramani Vellaiyan
Keyword(s):  
Breathing Pattern ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Conservative Surgery ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Deep Inspiration ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Arc Therapy

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of changes in breathing pattern inside the breath-hold window (BHW) during deep inspiration breath hold treatment for carcinoma left breast patients post-conservative surgery. Methods: Ten patients of carcinoma left breast post-conservative surgery were prospectively selected. Three sets of CT plain images were acquired, one with 5 mm deep inspiration BHW (DIBHR) and the other one with 1 mm BHW matching the lower threshold (DIBHL) and the third one with 1 mm BHW matching the upper threshold (DIBHH) as DIBHR. For all patients, forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated in the 5 mm BHW CT series and the same plan being copy and pasted in other series. Target volume doses and critical structure doses were tabulated. Results: Planning target volume coverage was adequate and no significant differences were found in any CT series. Significant differences noted in average left lung V5%, V10% and V18% doses between DIBHR versus DIBHH (p values = 0·0461, 0·0283 and 0·0213, respectively) and DIBHL versus DIBHH (p values = 0·0434, 0·0484 and 0·0334, respectively) for FIMRT plans and V18% doses in DIBHR versus DIBHH (p = 0·0067) in VMAT. No differences in heart and apex of heart doses were found. Left anterior descending artery (LAD) mean doses were significant in DIBHL versus DIBHR, DIBHR versus DIBHH and DIBHL versus DIBHH (p = 0·0012, 0·0444 and 0·0048, respectively) series for FIMRT plans and DIBHR versus DIBHH and DIBHL versus DIBHH (p = 0·0341, 0·0001) for VMAT plans. Finding: The changes in the breathing pattern inside DIBH window level cause some variation in LAD doses and no other significant differences in any parameters noted, so care should be taken while treating patients with preexisting cardiac conditions.

Left Breast Radiotherapy With Multi Fields Hybrid Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Versus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): Balance Between Left Anterior Descending Artery Sparing and Secondary Cancer Induction Risk

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyong Xiang ◽  
Zhen Ding ◽  
Kailian Kang ◽  
Zhitao Dai ◽  
Wenjue Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Left Lung ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Radiotherapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy ◽  
Arc Therapy

Abstract To explore the feasibility of using Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) to protect left anterior descending branch (LAD) after breast-conserving surgery for left breast cancer. 15 left breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery were selected. 7F-IMRT and 2A-VMAT treatment plans were designed with Varian Eclipse TPS (13.6version). The prescriptions of PTV and PTV Boost were 43.5Gy and 49.5Gy in 15 fractions. The dosimetric parameters, OARs dose sparing and second cancer risk (SCR) were compared between the two plans using a paired t-test. The VMAT plans obtain better PTV conformity and higher mean dose. VMAT plans show a better dose distribution in high dose areas and better sparing of OARs, including left lung, heart, and LAD. The Dmax and Dmean of LAD decreased significantly in VMAT plans. The SCRs of the contralateral lung and breast significantly increased with a higher mean dose. We recommend that contouring and evaluating the dose of LAD and LAD helping structures in left breast cancer radiotherapy. SCR should be evaluated for younger patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document