SU-E-I-31: Differences Observed in Radiation Doses Across 2 Similar CT Scanners From Adult Brain-Neck CT Angiography

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6Part6) ◽  
pp. 3248-3248
Author(s):  
K Fujii ◽  
K McMillan ◽  
M Bostani ◽  
C Cagnon ◽  
M McNitt-Gray
Radiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 281 (3) ◽  
pp. 737-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Symons ◽  
Justin Z. Morris ◽  
Colin O. Wu ◽  
Amir Pourmorteza ◽  
Mark A. Ahlman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii29-ii29
Author(s):  
Masamichi Koyanagi ◽  
Mitsuru Suzuki ◽  
Satoshi Kikuyama ◽  
Akihito Nakanishi ◽  
Miho Gomyou ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND In brain CT angiography (CTA) for assisting brain tumor surgery, delineation of the superficial cerebral venous system is critical for selecting the optimal surgical approach. This delineation is, however, limited using conventional CT scanners, including an area-detector CT (ADCT) scanner, due to their insufficient spatial resolution. Since March 2017, a state-of-the-art ultrahigh-resolution CT (UHRCT) scanner has been clinically available to improve in- and through-plane spatial resolution compared with conventional CT scanners, mainly due to smaller slice thickness from 0.5 mm to 0.25 mm, larger channel number from 896 to 1792, and smaller x-ray focus from 0.9 x 0.8 mm to 0.4 x 0.5 mm.PurposeWe assessed usefulness of UHRCT to improve delineation of the superficial cerebral venous system in brain CTA for assisting brain tumor surgery compared with conventional ADCT. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled patients with intra- and/or extra-axial brain tumors who underwent preoperative brain CTA for assisting brain tumor surgery by UHRCT or ADCT using our routine technique and generated the CTA to delineate the superficial cerebral venous system using the same technique. Two reviewers by consensus subjectively counted the number of the superficial sylvian veins and the cortical veins draining into these veins and the maximal bifurcation order of the cortical veins draining into the superior sagittal sinus. We compared these numbers and the maximal bifurcation order in the CTA between the UHRCT and ADCT groups using the intraoperative findings as the reference. RESULTS The numbers and the maximal bifurcation order in the UHRCT group were significantly greater and more accurate than those in the ADCT group. CONCLUSIONS Use of UHRCT can be clinically useful for better delineating the superficial cerebral venous system in brain CTA and assisting brain tumor surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 268-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel A. Castellano ◽  
Edward D. Nicol ◽  
Russell K. Bull ◽  
Carl A. Roobottom ◽  
Michelle C. Williams ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Issahaku Shirazu ◽  
Y. B Mensah ◽  
Cyril Schandorf ◽  
S. Y. Mensah ◽  
Alfred Owusu

Although the use of CT in medical diagnosis delivers radiation doses to patients that are higher than those from other radiological procedures, lack of proper optimized protocols could be an additional source of increased dose in developing countries. The aims of this study is to determine the variations of doses to patients undergoing CT scan using four different CT scanners with different CT scanning protocols for the purposes of optimizations and to compare with other available international standard and guidelines. The method involve the use of patients scanning protocol and image data to estimate patient body regional doses with four common CT examinations. These were obtained from four CT units/hospitals in Ghana. A large variation of mean body regional doses among different CT scanners were observed for similar CT examinations. These variations largely originated from different CT scanning protocols used, with different CT scanner type. The measured CTDIVOL with GE Lightspeed VCT 64 scanner for head, hest, abdomen and pelvis were 7.7mGy, 12.5 mGy, 14.4 mGy, and 12.9 mGy, respectively. Similarly, Philip 16 scanner recorded 6.6mGy, 13.1mGy, 14.8mGy, and 14.5mGy respectively. Furthermore, Siemen Emotion 16 scanner recorded 5.9mGy, 14.2mGy, 16.8mGy and 12.0mGy respectively. While, Toshiba Aquilion one scanner had CTDIVOL value which varies as 7.2mGy, 13.4mGy, 15.2mGy and 13.5mGy respectively. In conclusion the values were mostly lower than the values of CTDI and DLP as reported in literature for EC, IAEA, ICRP, ACR and AAPM Guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document