SU-E-T-589: A Comparison of Field Size Dependence of Electron Depth Dose From Different Linacs

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (6Part21) ◽  
pp. 363-363
Author(s):  
M Kim ◽  
T Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Size Dependence ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Depth Dose

Field size dependence of wedge factors

1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 624-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatinder R. Palta ◽  
Inder Daftari ◽  
N. Suntharalingam
Keyword(s):  
Size Dependence ◽  
Field Size

Percentage depth dose fragmentation for investigating and assessing the photon beam dosimetry quality

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (03) ◽  
pp. 280-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Bencheikh ◽  
Abdelmajid Maghnouj ◽  
Jaouad Tajmouati
Keyword(s):  
Exponential Decay ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Photon Beam ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Photon Beams ◽  
Energy Agency ◽  
Percentage Depth Dose ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Beam Dosimetry

AbstractAimThe purpose of this study is to introduce a new approach to assess the dosimetry quality of photon beam with energy and irradiation field size. This approach is based on percentage depth dose (PDD) fragmentation for investigating the dosimetry quality.Materials and methodsFor the investigation of the dosimetry quality of 6 and 18 MV photon beams, we have proceeded to fragment the PDD at different field sizes. This approach checks the overall PDD and is not restricted to the exponential decay regions, as per the International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Reports Series No 398 and the American Association of Physicist in Medicine Task Group 51 recommendations.Results and discussionThe 6 MV photon beam deposited more energy in the target volume than the 18 MV photon beam. The dose delivered by the 6 MV beam is greater by a factor of 1·5 than that delivered by the 18 MV beam in the build-up region and the dose delivered by the 6 MV beam is greater by a factor of 2·6 than that delivered by the 18 MV beam in the electronic equilibrium and the exponential decay regions.ConclusionThe dose measured at different points of the beam is higher for 6 MV than for 18 MV photon beam. Therefore, the 6 MV beam is more dosimetrically efficient than the 18 MV beam. Using the proposed approach, we can assess the dosimetry quality by taking into account overall PDD not only in the exponential decay region but also in the field.

scholarly journals Dosimetric Characterization of Small Radiotherapy Electron Beams Collimated by Circular Applicators with the New Microsilicon Detector

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 600
Author(s):  
Serenella Russo ◽  
Silvia Bettarini ◽  
Barbara Grilli Leonulli ◽  
Marco Esposito ◽  
Paolo Alpi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Field Size ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Linear Accelerators ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Dosimetric Data ◽  
Output Factors ◽  
Dose Measurements

High-energy small electron beams, generated by linear accelerators, are used for radiotherapy of localized superficial tumours. The aim of the present study is to assess the dosimetric performance under small radiation therapy electron beams of the novel PTW microSilicon detector compared to other available dosimeters. Relative dose measurements of circular fields with 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm aperture diameters were performed for electron beams generated by an Elekta Synergy linac, with energy between 4 and 12 MeV. Percentage depth dose, transverse profiles, and output factors, normalized to the 10 × 10 cm2 reference field, were measured. All dosimetric data were collected in a PTW MP3 motorized water phantom, at SSD of 100 cm, by using the novel PTW microSilicon detector. The PTW diode E and the PTW microDiamond were also used in all beam apertures for benchmarking. Data for the biggest field size were also measured by the PTW Advanced Markus ionization chamber. Measurements performed by the microSilicon are in good agreement with the reference values for all the tubular applicators and beam energies within the stated uncertainties. This confirms the reliability of the microSilicon detector for relative dosimetry of small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by circular applicators.

scholarly journals Commissioning Measurements of Electron Beam Using Montecarlo Algorithm on Truebeam STx® and Compariaon with Clinac iX Linear Accelerator

2021 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 01041
Author(s):  
Kamal Saidi ◽  
Redouane El Baydaoui ◽  
Hanae El Gouach ◽  
Othmane Kaanouch ◽  
Mohamed Reda Mesradi
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
Measured Data ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Water Phantom ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
International University ◽  
The Absolute

TrueBeam STx latest generation linear accelerators (linacs) installed at Sheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. The aim of this is to present and compare the result of the Electron commissioning measurement on TrueBeam Stx and clinac iX installed at Sheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. A compariaon of eMC calculations and measurements for TrueBeam Stx were evaluated. Dosimetric parameters are systematically measured using a large water phantom 3D scanning system MP3 Water Phantom (PTW, Freiburg, Germany). The data of the electron beams commissioning including depth dose curves for each applicator, depth dose curves without applicator and the profile in air for a large field size 40x 40cm2, and the Absolute Dose (cGy/MU) for each applicator. All the data were examined and compared for five electron beams (E6MeV, E9MeV, E12MeV, E16MeV and E20MeV) of Varian’s TrueBeam STx and Clinac iX machines. A comparison, between measurement PDDs and calculated by the Eclipse electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm were performed to validate Truebeam Stx commissioning. All this measurements were performed with a Roos and Markus plane parallel chamber. Our measured data indicated that electron beam PDDs from the TrueBeam Stx machine are well matched to those from our Varian Clinac iX machine. Significant differences between TrueBeam and Clinac iX were found in in‐air profiles and open field output. Maximum depth dose for the TrueBeam Stx and Clinac iX for the following energies (6, 9, 12, 16, 20 MeV) are respectively (1.15; 1.89; 2.6; 3.1; and 2.35) and (1.24; 1.95; 2.70; 2.99 and 2.4cm). For the TrueBeam Stx and Clinac iX the quality index R50 for applicator 15x15 cm2 are in the tolerance intervals. Surface dose increases by increasing energy for both machines. The Absolute Dose (cGy/MU) calibrated for both machine in Dmax at 1cGy/MU for the reference field size cone 15x15 cm2. Bremsstrahlung tail Rp per energy levels as follows for the TrueBeam Stx : 6 MeV – 2.85 cm, 9 MeV – 4.28 cm, 12 MeV – 5.97 cm, 16 MeV – 7.88 cm and 20 MeV – 9.86 cm. and for the Clinac iX : 6 MeV – 2.86 cm, 9 MeV – 4.32 cm, 12 MeV – 5.96 cm, 16 MeV – 7.93 cm and 20 MeV – 10.08 cm. A good agreement between modeled and measured data is observed.

Khảo sát một số đặc tính bức xạ của buồng ion hóa CC13 và diode bán dẫn razor đối với các chùm photon kích thước nhỏ trên máy gia tốc tuyến tính xạ trị Clinac IX

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tu Vu Ngoc
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Field ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Dose Distribution ◽  
Ionization Chamber ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Photon Beams ◽  
Silicon Diode ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
The Difference

Purpose: Compare percent depth dose (PDD) and off-center ratio (OCR) measured by the CC13 ionization chamber and the RAZOR silicon diode in small photon beams. Method and Materials: Some dosimetric characteristics, such as PDD, OCR, penumbra and radiation field size, were considered in this study for 2x2, 3x3, and 4x4 cm2 field sizes. We used the CC13 ionization chamber and the RAZOR silicon diode to measure dose distribution with depth along the axis and off-center of the beam. From the results obtained, the team investigated the differences in radiation parameters measured by the two types of probes above. Results: There are significant differences in the radiation parameters investigated for the CC13 ionization chamber and the RAZOR silicon diode, especially the width of penumbra. For PDD curves, the difference is less than 5% from dmax to 30 cm, however the difference becomes greater in the build-up region, which reaches to 33% at the water phatom surface. The width of penumbra measured by CC13 is always larger than that of RAZOR, the ratio of the penumbra width between two detectors is 1.8 and 1.3 for energies of 6 MV and 15 MV, respectively. Conclusion: The RAZOR silicon diode has better dose response than the CC13 ionization chamber for measuring the PDD and the OCR in small photon beams.

Elimination of field size dependence of enhanced dynamic wedge factors

2000 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 3359-3365 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Sethi ◽  
L B Leybovich ◽  
N Dogan ◽  
G P Glasgow
Keyword(s):  
Size Dependence ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Dynamic Wedge

scholarly journals Design and Analysis Effect of Gantry Angle Photon Beam 4 MV on Dose Distributions using Monte Carlo Method EGSnrc Code System

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-20
Author(s):  
Uum Yuliani ◽  
Ridwan Ramdani ◽  
Freddy Haryanto ◽  
Yudha Satya Perkasa ◽  
Mada Sanjaya
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Photon Beam ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Dose Calculations ◽  
Dose Distributions ◽  
Percentage Depth Dose ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Surface Field ◽  
Gantry Angle

Varian linac modeling has been carried out to obtain Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) and profiles using variations gantry angle 0o, 15o, 30o , 45o in the vertical axis of the surface, field size 10x10 cm2, photon beam 4 MV and Monte Carlo simulations. Percentage Depth Dose and profile illustrates dose distributions in a phantom water measuring 40x40x40 cm3, changes gantry is one of the factors that determine the distribution of the dose to the patient research shows changes in Dmax in the Percentage Depth Dose is affected by changes in the angle gantry resulted in the addition of the area build up so it can be used for therapy in the region and produce skin sparing effects that can be used to protect the skin from exposure to radiation. The graph result is profiles obtained show lack simetrisan in areas positive quadrant has a distribution of fewer doses than the quadrant of negative as well as the slope of the surface so that it can be used for some cases treatments that require a depth and a certain slope, dose calculations are more accurate and can minimize side effects.

scholarly journals Improving Clinical dosimetric Accuracy of cancer treatment using a special quality of Electron and Photon Beam

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayesha Ikhlaq ◽  
Saeed Ahmad Buzdar ◽  
Muhammad Usman Mustafa ◽  
Sana Salahuddin ◽  
Mehr-Un-Nisa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
Photon Beam ◽  
Field Size ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Photon Beams ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Electron And Photon

In external beam radiation therapy, electron and photon beams have extraordinary characteristics in the treatment of cancer. The electron and photon beam characteristic are essential to study before calibration of machine. This study focused on the dosimetric characteristics of different energies of electron beams for different field size. The basic objective of this work is, to calculate dosimetric parameters and characteristics of electron beam, specially depth dose characteristics along central axis. In this work, 6 MeV, 9 MeV, 12 MeV, 15 MeV and 18 MeV of electron beam and 6 MV and 15 MV of photon beam with different field size is used. Characteristics of depth dose of electron and photon beam in water have analyzed to provide better quality of radiation therapy treatment planning. The different beam characteristics are due to different interactions that occurs between electron beams giving them a definite range whereas photon beams are attenuated leading to dose deposition and much larger range with no definite end. Depth dose characteristics of electron and photon beams do not show same characteristics as interaction of beam with matter depends on the quality of beam. Attenuation and penetration factors change with changing dosimetric parameters. Complete analysis of dosimetric characteristics of electron and photon beam help to choose more accurate beam for the treatment of cancer. This work will help to increase accuracy in treatment of cancer with radiotherapy.

SU-E-T-92: The Field Size Dependence of the ArcCheck 4D Diode Array and Its Correction Strategy

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (6Part11) ◽  
pp. 3507-3507
Author(s):  
J Li ◽  
G Yan ◽  
B Lu ◽  
C Liu
Keyword(s):  
Size Dependence ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Diode Array
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document