SU-E-I-99: Estimation of Effective Charge Distribution by Dual-Energy CT Reconstruction

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (6Part6) ◽  
pp. 153-153
Author(s):  
D Sakata ◽  
S Kida ◽  
M Nakano ◽  
Y Masutani ◽  
K Nakagawa ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Depypere ◽  
J. Nuyts ◽  
N. van Gastel ◽  
G. Carmeliet ◽  
F. Maes ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 218-222
Author(s):  
Sven S. Walter ◽  
Sven Schneeweiß ◽  
Michael Maurer ◽  
Mareen S. Kraus ◽  
Julian L. Wichmann ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 2129-2142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangyue Zhang ◽  
Dong Han ◽  
David G. Politte ◽  
Jeffrey F. Williamson ◽  
Joseph A. O'Sullivan

Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Liu ◽  
Peng Zheng ◽  
Chunming Zhang

Dual energy CT (DECT) has become a hot topic for its high detection precision and robust material identification ability in the field of nuclear safety and security inspection. However, the high cost of the system becomes a big limitation for its wide usage. To solve this problem, in 2009, we have proposed a dual energy CT reconstruction method with reduced data (DECT-RD) requiring much fewer data to reduce the cost of detectors. However, it is a simple idea without more analyzing in the process of solving ill-posed equations. In this paper, we tried to solve ill-posed equations with constraint condition (DECT-RDCC) and least squares (DECT-RDLS) respectively. Numerical simulations are done by using DECT-RD, DECT-RDCC and DECT-RDLS in the same situation, only 7 dual energy detector bins instead of 256 complete bin sampling in each projection. Results demonstrated that DECT-RDCC with relative error less than 1.1% is better than DECT-RD with relative error less than 1.8% while DECT-RDLS plays a more exact and steady role with relative error less than 0.6% than DECT-RDCC. Hence, DECT-RDLS is a better method used to obtain much lower system cost. We believe this work will drive DECT into wide usage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document