SU-E-I-33: Initial Evaluation of Model-Based Iterative CT Reconstruction Using Standard Image Quality Phantoms

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (6Part5) ◽  
pp. 137-137
Author(s):  
E Gingold ◽  
J Dave
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Initial Evaluation ◽  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Iterative Ct Reconstruction

An improved combination of ordered subsets and momentum for fast model-based iterative CT reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Haase ◽  
Karl Stierstorfer ◽  
Katharina Hahn ◽  
Harald Schöndube ◽  
Andreas Maier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Iterative Ct Reconstruction

scholarly journals Iterative CT reconstruction in abdominal low-dose CT used for hybrid SPECT-CT applications: effect on image quality, image noise, detectability, and reader’s confidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 205846011985626
Author(s):  
Oliver S Grosser ◽  
Juri Ruf ◽  
Dennis Kupitz ◽  
Damian Czuczwara ◽  
David Loewenthal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Bone Structure ◽  
Reconstruction Algorithm ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Quality Image ◽  
Iterative Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Ct Data

Background Iterative computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction shows high potential for the preservation of image quality in diagnostic CT while reducing patients’ exposure; it has become available for low-dose CT (LD-CT) in high-end hybrid imaging systems (e.g. single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]-CT). Purpose To examine the effect of an iterative CT reconstruction algorithm on image quality, image noise, detectability, and the reader’s confidence for LD-CT data by a subjective assessment. Material and Methods The LD-CT data were validated for 40 patients examined by an abdominal hybrid SPECT-CT (U = 120 kV, I = 40 mA, pitch = 1.375). LD-CT was reconstructed using either filtered back projection (FBP) or an iterative image reconstruction algorithm (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction [ASIR]®) with different parameters (ASIR levels 50% and 100%). The data were validated by two independent blinded readers using a scoring system for image quality, image noise, detectability, and reader confidence, for a predefined set of 16 anatomic substructures. Results The image quality was significantly improved by iterative reconstruction of the LD-CT data compared with FBP ( P ≤ 0.0001). While detectability increased in only 2/16 structures ( P ≤ 0.03), the reader’s confidence increased significantly due to iterative reconstruction ( P ≤ 0.002). Meanwhile, at the ASIR level of 100%, the detectability in bone structure was highly reduced ( P = 0.003). Conclusion An ASIR level of 50% represents a good compromise in abdominal LD-CT image reconstruction. The specific ASIR level improved image quality (reduced image noise) and reader confidence, while preserving detectability of bone structure.

Estimation of statistical weights for model-based iterative CT reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Haase ◽  
Karl Stierstorfer ◽  
Katharina Hahn ◽  
Harald Schöndube ◽  
Andreas Maier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Iterative Ct Reconstruction

scholarly journals Deep learning–based reconstruction may improve non-contrast cerebral CT imaging compared to other current reconstruction algorithms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luuk J. Oostveen ◽  
Frederick J. A. Meijer ◽  
Frank de Lange ◽  
Ewoud J. Smit ◽  
Sjoert A. Pegge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
White Matter ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Quality Characteristics ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Contrast Ct ◽  
Lower Noise ◽  
Reconstruction Time

Abstract Objectives To evaluate image quality and reconstruction times of a commercial deep learning reconstruction algorithm (DLR) compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction (Hybrid-IR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms for cerebral non-contrast CT (NCCT). Methods Cerebral NCCT acquisitions of 50 consecutive patients were reconstructed using DLR, Hybrid-IR and MBIR with a clinical CT system. Image quality, in terms of six subjective characteristics (noise, sharpness, grey-white matter differentiation, artefacts, natural appearance and overall image quality), was scored by five observers. As objective metrics of image quality, the noise magnitude and signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) of the grey and white matter were calculated. Mean values for the image quality characteristics scored by the observers were estimated using a general linear model to account for multiple readers. The estimated means for the reconstruction methods were pairwise compared. Calculated measures were compared using paired t tests. Results For all image quality characteristics, DLR images were scored significantly higher than MBIR images. Compared to Hybrid-IR, perceived noise and grey-white matter differentiation were better with DLR, while no difference was detected for other image quality characteristics. Noise magnitude was lower for DLR compared to Hybrid-IR and MBIR (5.6, 6.4 and 6.2, respectively) and SDNR higher (2.4, 1.9 and 2.0, respectively). Reconstruction times were 27 s, 44 s and 176 s for Hybrid-IR, DLR and MBIR respectively. Conclusions With a slight increase in reconstruction time, DLR results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to Hybrid-IR. Image quality of MBIR is significantly lower compared to DLR with much longer reconstruction times. Key Points • Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction. • Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in better image quality in all aspects evaluated compared to model-based iterative reconstruction. • Deep learning reconstruction only needs a slight increase in reconstruction time compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction, while model-based iterative reconstruction requires considerably longer processing time.

Model-based reconstruction algorithm in the detection of acute trauma-related lesions in brain CT examinations

2021 ◽  
pp. 197140092110087
Author(s):  
Andrea De Vito ◽  
Cesare Maino ◽  
Sophie Lombardi ◽  
Maria Ragusi ◽  
Cammillo Talei Franzesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Reconstruction Algorithm ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Subjective Image Quality ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography

Background and purpose To evaluate the added value of a model-based reconstruction algorithm in the assessment of acute traumatic brain lesions in emergency non-enhanced computed tomography, in comparison with a standard hybrid iterative reconstruction approach. Materials and methods We retrospectively evaluated a total of 350 patients who underwent a 256-row non-enhanced computed tomography scan at the emergency department for brain trauma. Images were reconstructed both with hybrid and model-based iterative algorithm. Two radiologists, blinded to clinical data, recorded the presence, nature, number, and location of acute findings. Subjective image quality was performed using a 4-point scale. Objective image quality was determined by computing the signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio. The agreement between the two readers was evaluated using k-statistics. Results A subjective image quality analysis using model-based iterative reconstruction gave a higher detection rate of acute trauma-related lesions in comparison to hybrid iterative reconstruction (extradural haematomas 116 vs. 68, subdural haemorrhages 162 vs. 98, subarachnoid haemorrhages 118 vs. 78, parenchymal haemorrhages 94 vs. 64, contusive lesions 36 vs. 28, diffuse axonal injuries 75 vs. 31; all P<0.001). Inter-observer agreement was moderate to excellent in evaluating all injuries (extradural haematomas k=0.79, subdural haemorrhages k=0.82, subarachnoid haemorrhages k=0.91, parenchymal haemorrhages k=0.98, contusive lesions k=0.88, diffuse axonal injuries k=0.70). Quantitatively, the mean standard deviation of the thalamus on model-based iterative reconstruction images was lower in comparison to hybrid iterative one (2.12 ± 0.92 vsa 3.52 ± 1.10; P=0.030) while the contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio were significantly higher (contrast-to-noise ratio 3.06 ± 0.55 vs. 1.55 ± 0.68, signal-to-noise ratio 14.51 ± 1.78 vs. 8.62 ± 1.88; P<0.0001). Median subjective image quality values for model-based iterative reconstruction were significantly higher ( P=0.003). Conclusion Model-based iterative reconstruction, offering a higher image quality at a thinner slice, allowed the identification of a higher number of acute traumatic lesions than hybrid iterative reconstruction, with a significant reduction of noise.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document