scholarly journals Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: Automated measurement development for full field digital mammography

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 113502 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. E. Fowler ◽  
T. A. Sellers ◽  
B. Lu ◽  
J. J. Heine
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Data System ◽  
Measurement Development ◽  
Automated Measurement ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography

EVOLUTION IN BREAST IMAGING

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sushil J. Sikchi
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Direct Exposure ◽  
Breast Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Self Examination

Evolution in breast imaging has dramatically changed and upgraded  by  wide variety of technologic advances from the early days of direct-exposure film mammography to xeromammography to screen-film mammography to the current era of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. In early 1950 Mammography has been introduced along with the breast self examination. After two decades thermography and ultrasound examination  has been added in the breast imaging . From year 1990 to 2000 drastic technological advances, organized screening,  with  BI-RAD  classification introduced by  American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System have helped to shape the specialty of breast imaging. With the development of digital mammography and tomosynthesis in 2020, breast ultrasonography and breast magnetic resonance imaging, both complementary to mammography,  has set new standard in diagnostic accuracy of breast  lesions.This  paper gives a quick insight  to the development of   breast imaging and reviews the evolution of breast imaging starting from a historical perspective and progressing to the present day. Keywords: Mammography screening, tomosynthesis ,Digital mammography.

Sensitivity of a Direct Computer-aided Detection System in Full-field Digital Mammography for Detection of Microcalcifications Not Associated with Mass or Architectural Distortion

2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabel M. Scaranelo ◽  
Pavel Crystal ◽  
Karina Bukhanov ◽  
Thomas H. Helbich
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Architectural Distortion ◽  
Computer Aided Detection ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Computer Aided

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection (CAD) system (d-CAD) in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for the detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion. Materials and Methods A database search of 1063 consecutive stereotactic core biopsies performed between 2002 and 2005 identified 196 patients with Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 and 5 microcalcifications not associated with mass or distortion detected exclusively by bilateral FFDM. A commercially available CAD system (Second Look, version 7.2) was retrospectively applied to the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views in these patients (mean age, 59 years; range, 35–84 years). Breast density, location and mammographic size of the lesion, distribution, and tumour histology were recorded and analysed by using χ2, Fisher exact, or McNemar tests, when applicable. Results When using d-CAD, 71 of 74 malignant microcalcification cases (96%) and 101 of 122 benign microcalcifications (83%) were identified. There was a significant difference ( P < .05) between CAD sensitivity on the craniocaudal view, 91% (68 of 75), vs CAD sensitivity on the mediolateral oblique view, 80% (60 of 75). The d-CAD sensitivity for dense breast tissue (American College of Radiology [ACR] density 3 and 4) was higher (97%) than d-CAD sensitivity (95%) for nondense tissue (ACR density 1 and 2), but the difference was not statically significant. All 28 malignant calcifications larger than 10 mm were detected by CAD, whereas the sensitivity for lesions small than or equal to 10 mm was 94%. Conclusions D-CAD had a high sensitivity in the depiction of asymptomatic breast cancers, which were seen as microcalcifications on FFDM screening, with a sensitivity of d-CAD on the craniocaudal view being significantly better. All malignant microcalcifications larger than 10 mm were detected by d-CAD.

Noise analysis of full field digital mammography systems

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Ravaglia ◽  
R. Bouwman ◽  
K. Young ◽  
R. Van Engen ◽  
B. Lazzari
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Noise Analysis ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography

Contrast-detail evaluation of a full-field digital mammography system

2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 870-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.G. Darambara ◽  
A. Taibi ◽  
R.D. Speller ◽  
M. Gambaccini
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document