SU-E-J-95: Towards Optimum Boundary Conditions for Biomechanical Model Based Deformable Registration Using Intensity Based Image Matching for Prostate Correlative Pathology

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6Part7) ◽  
pp. 3674-3674 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Samavati ◽  
D.M. McGrath ◽  
J Lee ◽  
T van der Kwast ◽  
M Jewett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Image Matching ◽  
Biomechanical Model ◽  
Deformable Registration ◽  
Model Based

SU-GG-J-102: Image Guided Radiotherapy of the Cervix with Biomechanical Model-Based Deformable Registration

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (6Part7) ◽  
pp. 2702-2702
Author(s):  
K Brock ◽  
J Moseley ◽  
J Stewart ◽  
K Lim ◽  
J Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biomechanical Model ◽  
Deformable Registration ◽  
Image Guided Radiotherapy ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Model Based

scholarly journals Biomechanical model-based deformable registration of MRI and histopathology for clinical prostatectomy

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
KristyK Brock ◽  
Navid Samavati ◽  
Jenny Lee ◽  
Michael Jewett ◽  
DeirdreM McGrath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biomechanical Model ◽  
Deformable Registration ◽  
Model Based

scholarly journals An ankle joint model-based image-matching motion analysis technique

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kam-Ming Mok ◽  
Daniel Tik-Pui Fong ◽  
Tron Krosshaug ◽  
Aaron See-Long Hung ◽  
Patrick Shu-Hang Yung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Image Matching ◽  
Joint Model ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Analysis Technique

Three alternative versions of the theory for a Timoshenko–Ehrenfest beam on a Winkler–Pasternak foundation

2020 ◽  
pp. 108128652094777
Author(s):  
Giulio Maria Tonzani ◽  
Isaac Elishakoff
Keyword(s):  
Free Vibration ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Vibration Frequencies ◽  
Pasternak Foundation ◽  
New Model ◽  
Simply Supported ◽  
Model Based

This paper analyzes the free vibration frequencies of a beam on a Winkler–Pasternak foundation via the original Timoshenko–Ehrenfest theory, a truncated version of the Timoshenko–Ehrenfest equation, and a new model based on slope inertia. We give a detailed comparison between the three models in the context of six different sets of boundary conditions. In particular, we analyze the most common combinations of boundary conditions deriving from three typical end constraints, namely the simply supported end, clamped end, and free end. An interesting intermingling phenomenon is presented for a simply-supported (S-S) beam together with proof of the ‘non-existence’ of zero frequencies for free-free (F-F) and simply supported-free (S-F) beams on a Winkler–Pasternak foundation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document