Quality assurance of U.S.-guided external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Report of AAPM Task Group 154

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 857-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janelle A. Molloy ◽  
Gordon Chan ◽  
Alexander Markovic ◽  
Shawn McNeeley ◽  
Doug Pfeiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Quality Assurance ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Task Group ◽  
External Beam

LOW-DOSE-RATE OR HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY IN COMBINATION WITH EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY FOR INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-83
Author(s):  
Vladimir Solodkiy ◽  
Andrey Pavlov ◽  
Aleksey Tsybulskiy ◽  
Anton Ivashin
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Low Dose Rate ◽  
Risk Of Progression

Introduction. One of the main problems of modem on-courology is treatment for prostate cancer of intermediate and high risk of progression. Modern radiotherapy in this category of patients has an advantage over surgical methods of treatment. One way to improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy is to escalate the dose in the prostate gland. For this purpose a combination of brachytherapy and remote radiotherapy is used. This combination allows increasing the dose of radiation, thereby providing better local control, reducing complications from neighboring organs. Purpose of the study. To conduct a comparative analysis of efficacy and safety of radical treatment of patients with prostate cancer at medium and high risk of progression using a combination of high and low dose rate brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy. Materials and methods. 107 patients with prostate cancer of the group of medium and high risk of progression combined treatment (brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy) was conducted. 53 patients underwent combined treatment (HDR-brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy). 54 patients underwent combined treatment (LDR-brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy). The observation period was 5 years. Conclusion. In a comparative analysis in groups of combined radiotherapy with the use of high-dose and low-dose-rate brachytherapy, the same effectiveness of immediate and long-term results of treatment was demonstrated. A significant reduction in early and late toxic reactions in patients with high-power brachytherapy has been demonstrated.

scholarly journals Addition of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy or Brachytherapy Boost to External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (26) ◽  
pp. 3024-3031 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Jackson ◽  
Holly E. Hartman ◽  
Robert T. Dess ◽  
Sam R. Birer ◽  
Payal D. Soni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Brachytherapy Boost ◽  
Meta Analyses

PURPOSE In men with localized prostate cancer, the addition of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) or a brachytherapy boost (BT) to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) have been shown to improve various oncologic end points. Practice patterns indicate that those who receive BT are significantly less likely to receive ADT, and thus we sought to perform a network meta-analysis to compare the predicted outcomes of a randomized trial of EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT plus BT. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review identified published randomized trials comparing EBRT with or without ADT, or EBRT (with or without ADT) with or without BT, that reported on overall survival (OS). Standard fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed for each comparison, and a meta-regression was conducted to adjust for use and duration of ADT. Network meta-analyses were performed to compare EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT plus BT. Bayesian analyses were also performed, and a rank was assigned to each treatment after Markov Chain Monte Carlo analyses to create a surface under the cumulative ranking curve. RESULTS Six trials compared EBRT with or without ADT (n = 4,663), and 3 compared EBRT with or without BT (n = 718). The addition of ADT to EBRT improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.81]), whereas the addition of BT did not significantly improve OS (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.36]). In a network meta-analysis, EBRT plus ADT had improved OS compared with EBRT plus BT (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89]). Bayesian modeling demonstrated an 88% probability that EBRT plus ADT resulted in superior OS compared with EBRT plus BT. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that current practice patterns of omitting ADT with EBRT plus BT may result in inferior OS compared with EBRT plus ADT in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. ADT for these men should remain a critical component of treatment regardless of radiotherapy delivery method until randomized evidence demonstrates otherwise.

Is external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer a risk factor for bladder or rectal cancer?

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. e975
Author(s):  
M. Mekayten ◽  
M. Duvdevani ◽  
V. Yutkin ◽  
D. Pode ◽  
G. Hidas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
External Beam

7027 POSTER Postoperative External Beam Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer -Results of the Spanish Registry of Prostate Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S492
Author(s):  
A. Hervas ◽  
M.C. Vallejo ◽  
J.L. Lopez ◽  
A. Gomez-lturriaga ◽  
A. Gomez-Caamaño ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
External Beam
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document