SU-GG-J-54: Comparison of Head and Neck Localization with Portal Imaging and Megavoltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (6Part6) ◽  
pp. 2691-2691
Author(s):  
O Gayou ◽  
D Parda ◽  
M Miften
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Portal Imaging

Ionizing radiation and its considerations in imaging diagnosis: comparison of absorbed dose between cone beam computed tomography and multi-detector computed tomography in the head and neck

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.L.E. Oliveira ◽  
C.R. Starling ◽  
C.L.P. Maurício ◽  
F.R. Guedes ◽  
M.A. Visconti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Absorbed Dose ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Thermoluminescent Dosimeters ◽  
Organ Tissue ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Average Adult ◽  
Multi Detector Computed Tomography

Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare the mean absorbed dose in patients undergoing head and neck examinations using two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT, Kodak and i-CAT) and one multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods: Three thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), calibrated in air kerma, were positioned in 24 regions of the head and neck of a phantom simulating an average adult. The mean absorbed dose (mGy) values in these positions, for different organs and tissues, were obtained using correction factors, considering the ratio between the mass energy absorption coefficients of organ/tissue and air. Comparison between radiation doses in the most radiosensitive regions was done by calculating the ratio of these dose values, with propagated uncertainty. Results: The dose in all regions was significantly higher for MDCT when compared to CBCT. Concerning CBCT equipment, the Kodak device had a higher absorbed dose than the i-CAT for most of the regions tested. The uncertainty of the i-CAT was greater than that of the Kodak. Conclusion: Due to the considerable difference between absorbed doses, emphasizing the higher dose values obtained in MDCT, the dissemination of CBCT application in medicine is recommended, as well as further studies to broaden the criteria for use.

scholarly journals Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Weiss ◽  
Andrew Read-Fuller
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
3 Dimensional

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a valuable imaging technique in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) that can help direct a surgeon’s approach to a variety of conditions. A 3-dimensional analysis of head and neck anatomy allows practitioners to plan appropriately, operate with confidence, and assess results post-operatively. CBCT imaging has clear indications and limitations. CBCT offers the clinician 3-dimensional and multi-planar views for a more accurate diagnosis and treatment without the financial burden and radiation exposure of conventional computed tomography (CT) scans. Furthermore, CBCT overcomes certain limitations of 2-dimensional imaging, such as distortion, magnification, and superimposition. However, CBCT lacks the detailed depiction of soft tissue conditions for evaluation of pathologic conditions, head and neck infections, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc evaluation. This review evaluates the evidence-based research supporting the application of CBCT in the various fields of oral and maxillofacial surgery, including dentoalveolar surgery, dental implants, TMJ, orthognathic surgery, trauma, and pathology, and will assess the value of CBCT in pre-operative assessment, surgical planning, and post-operative analysis when applicable. Additionally, the significant limitations of CBCT and potential areas for future research will be discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document