TU-D-L100J-07: The Use of CT Dual-Energy Subtraction Imaging to Detect Kidney Stones Amid Iodinated Contrast Material

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6Part18) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
OP Dzyubak ◽  
AN Primak ◽  
N Takahashi ◽  
TJ Vrtiska ◽  
RP Hartman ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 271-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Ishigaki ◽  
S Sakuma ◽  
Y Horikawa ◽  
M Ikeda ◽  
H Yamaguchi

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (01n02) ◽  
pp. 11-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. OGURI ◽  
J. HASEGAWA ◽  
M. OGAWA ◽  
J. KANEKO ◽  
K. SASA

Characteristic-line radiation from heavy metal targets bombarded by MeV proton beams has been tested as an X-ray source for dual-energy K-edge subtraction imaging for human angiography (blood vessel imaging) based on iodinated contrast media. To utilize the strong absorption by iodine (Z = 53) at its K-absorption edge (33.2 keV), we used K α-line of La (lanthanum, Z = 57) at 33.4 keV. As a reference, also K α X emission of Sn (tin, Z = 50) at 25.2 keV was employed. Metallic plates of La and Sn were irradiated by 7-MeV protons to produce these characteristic X-rays. Energy-subtraction method was tested using Lucite phantoms which contain aqueous solutions of KI (potassium iodide) with different concentrations. Also Ca ( H 2 PO 4)2 powder was stuffed in these phantoms to simulate bones. The transmission images of the phantoms were recorded on imaging plates. During the exposure, the energy spectra of the X-rays were monitored by a CdTe detector. We found that the contrast of images of iodide solutions taken with La X-rays was higher than that with Sn X-rays. Also the energy subtraction procedure was successfully applied to reduce the graphical noise due to the bones and inhomogeneity of the soft tissue. However, to apply the present method to actual clinical use, the X-ray intensity must be increased by several orders of magnitude. Also the transmission of the “lower-energy” photons has to be a few orders higher for imaging of objects as thick as human chest.


BJR|Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20210034
Author(s):  
Lidewij M.F.H. Neeter ◽  
H.P.J. (Frank) Raat ◽  
Rodrigo Alcantara ◽  
Quirien Robbe ◽  
Marjolein L. Smidt ◽  
...  

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a combination of standard mammography and iodinated contrast material administration. During the last decade, CEM has found its place in breast imaging protocols: after i.v. administration of iodinated contrast material, low-energy and high-energy images are retrieved in one acquisition using a dual-energy technique, and a recombined image is constructed enabling visualisation of areas of contrast uptake. The increased incorporation of CEM into everyday clinical practice is reflected in the installation of dedicated equipment worldwide, the (commercial) availability of systems from different vendors, the number of CEM examinations performed, and the number of scientific articles published on the subject. It follows that ever more radiologists will be confronted with this technique, and thus be required to keep up to date with the latest developments in the field. Most importantly, radiologists must have sufficient knowledge on how to interpret CEM images and be acquainted with common artefacts and pitfalls. This comprehensive review provides a practical overview of CEM technique, including CEM-guided biopsy; reading, interpretation and structured reporting of CEM images, including the accompanying learning curve, CEM artefacts and interpretation pitfalls; indications for CEM; disadvantages of CEM; and future developments.


1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Le Duc ◽  
Z. Zhong ◽  
L. Warkentien ◽  
B. Laster ◽  
W. Thomlinson

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Machida ◽  
Keiko Yoda ◽  
Yasuko Arai ◽  
Suguru Nishida ◽  
Ai Masukawa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1104) ◽  
pp. 20190530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Edward Taylor ◽  
Pamela Mager ◽  
Nam C. Yu ◽  
David P. Katz ◽  
Jett R. Brady ◽  
...  

Objectives: To estimate the minimum detectable iodine concentration on multiple dual-energy CT (DECT) platforms. Methods and materials: A phantom containing iodine concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 mg ml−1 was scanned with five dual-energy platforms (two rapid kilo volt switching (r-kVs), one dual source (DS), one sequential acquisition and one split-filter). Serial dilutions of 300 mg ml−1 iodinated contrast material were used to generate concentrations below 2 mg ml−1. Iodine density and virtual monoenergetic images were reviewed by three radiologists to determine the minimum visually detectable iodine concentration. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. Results: 1 mg mL−1 (~0.8 mg mL−1 corrected) was the minimum visually detectable concentration among the platforms and could be seen by all readers on the third-generation r-kVs and DS platforms. Conclusions: At low concentrations, CNR for monoenergetic images was highest on the DS platform and lowest in the sequential acquisition and split-filter platforms. Advances in knowledge: The results of this study corroborate previous in vivo estimates of iodine detection limits at DECT and provide a comparison for the performance of different DECT platforms at low iodine concentrations in vitro.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document