Sci-Thur PM Therapy-04: Comparison of treatment planning system and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions in an extreme water-lung interface phantom

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (7Part1) ◽  
pp. 2657-2658
Author(s):  
I Gagne ◽  
S Zavgorodni
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Dose Distributions ◽  
Calculated Dose

scholarly journals Verifying the accuracy of 3D-CRT dose distributions calculated by the Prowess Panther treatment planning system (TPS) with Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for head-and-neck (H&N) patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-99
Author(s):  
Luong Thi Oanh ◽  
Duong Thanh Tai ◽  
Hoang Duc Tuan ◽  
Truong Thi Hong Loan
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Average Dose ◽  
Monte Carlo Code ◽  
Dose Distributions ◽  
Mc Simulation ◽  
3D Crt

The purpose of this study is to verify and compare the three Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT) dose distributions calculated by the Prowess Panther treatment planning system (TPS) with Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for head-and-neck (H&N) patients. In this study, we used the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code which includes BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc programs. Firstly, the clinical 6 MV photon beams form Siemens Primus linear accelerator at Dong Nai General Hospital were simulated using the BEAMnrc. Secondly, the absorbed dose to patients treated by 3D-CRT was computed using the DOSXYZnrc. Finally, the simulated dose distributions were then compared with the ones calculated by the Fast Photon Effective algorithm on the TPS, using the relative dose error comparison and the gamma index using global methods implemented in PTW-VeriSoft with 3%/3 mm. There is a good agreement between the MC and TPS dose. The average gamma passing rates were 92.8% based on the 3%/3 mm. The average dose in the PTV agreed well between the TPS with 0.97% error. MC predict dose was higher than the mean dose to the parotid glands and spinal cord compared to TPS. We have implemented the EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo simulation to verify the 3D-CRT plans generated by Prowess Panther TPS. Our results showed that the TPS agreed with the one of MC.  

Clinical experience using Delta 4 phantom for pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance in modern radiotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 210-214
Author(s):  
R. P. Srivastava ◽  
C. De Wagter
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Dose Distributions ◽  
Gamma Index ◽  
Calculated Dose ◽  
Treatment Plans

AbstractPurposeIn advanced radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the quality assurance (QA) process is essential. The aim of the study was to assure the treatment planning dose delivered during delivery of complex treatment plans. The QA standard is to perform patient-specific comparisons between planned doses and doses measured in a phantom.Materials and methodThe Delta 4 phantom (Scandidos, Uppsala, Sweden) has been used in this study. This device consists of diode matrices in two orthogonal planes inserted in a cylindrical acrylic phantom. Each diode is sampled per beam pulse so that the dose distribution can be evaluated on segment-by-segment, beam-by-beam, or as a composite plan from a single set of measurements. Ninety-five simple and complex radiotherapy treatment plans for different pathologies, planned using a treatment planning system (TPS) were delivered to the QA device. The planned and measured dose distributions were then compared and analysed. The gamma index was determined for different pathologies.ResultsThe evaluation was performed in terms of dose deviation, distance to agreement and gamma index passing rate. The measurements were in excellent agreement between with the calculated dose of the TPS and the QA device. Overall, good agreement was observed between measured and calculated doses in most cases with gamma values above 1 in >95% of measured points. Plan results for each test met the recommended dose goals.ConclusionThe delivery of IMRT and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans was verified to correspond well with calculated dose distributions for different pathologies. We found the Delta 4 device is accurate and reproducible. Although Delta4 appears to be a straightforward device for measuring dose and allows measure in real-time dosimetry QA, it is a complex device and careful quality control is required before its use.

scholarly journals Dose distribution verification for GZP6 sources: A comparison of Monte Carlo, radiochromic film, and GZP6 treatment planning system

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahreyni Toossi ◽  
Mahdi Ghorbani ◽  
Asghar Mowlavi ◽  
Abdolreza Hashemian ◽  
Soleimani Meigooni
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Radiochromic Film ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Quality Assurance Program ◽  
Monte Carlo Code ◽  
Dose Calculations ◽  
Planning Systems ◽  
Dose Distributions

Background: Treatment planning systems (TPSs) are used for dose calculations in dose delivery by after loading brachytherapy machines. Such planning systems usually use simplified algorithms in their dose calculations. Verification of dose distributions produced by TPS is of clinical importance and is part of a quality assurance program. In this study, the dose distributions generated by GZP6 TPS for two GZP6 sources were verified. Methods: The evaluation was based on the inter comparisons between the isodose curves obtained through Monte Carlo simulations, radiochromic film measurements, and GZP6 treatment planning system. MCNPX Monte Carlo code was used to simulate the sources. Dose measurements were performed in a perspex phantom using Gafchromic? EBT radiochromic films. Comparisons between the results obtained from MC, RCF, and TPS were performed by gamma function calculations with 5% dose/2 mm distance criterion. Results: Based on gamma calculations our results showed that there was good agreement between the dose distributions obtained by the three aforementioned methods in both transverse and longitudinal planes for the GZP6 source No.2. However, for source No. 5, the agreement was good in the transverse plane but it was low in the longitudinal plane. Conclusion: The results showed that dose distributions certified by the GZP6 TPS for the GZP6 source No. 2 were validated. However, for source No. 5 some discrepancies were observed. Accurate knowledge of the activity of each active pellet in the source No. 5 can clarify the cause of the discrepancies.

scholarly journals A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyong Lin ◽  
Sheng Huang ◽  
Minglei Kang ◽  
Petri Hiltunen ◽  
Reynald Vanderstraeten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Pencil Beam ◽  
Beam Scanning ◽  
Pencil Beam Scanning

scholarly journals Evaluation of a treatment planning system developed for clinical boron neutron capture therapy and validation against an independent Monte Carlo dose calculation system

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naonori Hu ◽  
Hiroki Tanaka ◽  
Ryo Kakino ◽  
Syuushi Yoshikawa ◽  
Mamoru Miyao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Neutron Capture ◽  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Dose Calculation ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Neutron Capture Therapy ◽  
Boron Neutron Capture ◽  
Monte Carlo Dose Calculation

AbstractBoron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced, and recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck cancer has been approved by the Japanese government for reimbursement under the national health insurance as of June 2020. A new treatment planning system for clinical BNCT has been developed by Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Sumitomo), NeuCure® Dose Engine. To safely implement this system for clinical use, the simulated neutron flux and gamma ray dose rate inside a water phantom was compared against experimental measurements. Furthermore, to validate and verify the new planning system, the dose distribution inside an anthropomorphic head phantom was compared against a BNCT treatment planning system SERA and an in-house developed Monte Carlo dose calculation program. The simulated results closely matched the experimental results, within 5% for the thermal neutron flux and 10% for the gamma ray dose rate. The dose distribution inside the head phantom closely matched with SERA and the in-house developed dose calculation program, within 3% for the tumour and a difference of 0.3 Gyw for the brain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document