Results Of A Six-State Pilot Study To Collect Exposure, Technique And Processing Data In Chest Radiography

Author(s):  
P. F. Butler ◽  
B. J. Conway ◽  
O. H. Suleiman ◽  
G. H. Koustenis ◽  
C. K. Showalter
2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 415-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Rodriguez ◽  
Gregory W. Hendey ◽  
Gillian Marek ◽  
Robert A. Dery ◽  
Anna Bjoring

Data in Brief ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 1250-1256
Author(s):  
Justina A. Achuka ◽  
Moses A. Aweda ◽  
Mojisola R. Usikalu ◽  
Caleb A. Aborisade

1992 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1467
Author(s):  
Toshimitsu Sakuma ◽  
Seisyou Sasaki ◽  
Toshihiro Oohisa ◽  
Michiaki Itou ◽  
Shigeru Abiko ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1468
Author(s):  
Hisayoshi Abe ◽  
Toshihiro Oohisa ◽  
Mitiaki Itoh ◽  
Tosimitu Sakuma ◽  
Seisyo Sasaki ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 749-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Silvestri ◽  
M. Maffessanti ◽  
D. Gregori ◽  
G. Berlot ◽  
A. Gullo

1989 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kehler ◽  
U. Albrechtsson ◽  
B. Andersson ◽  
H. Lárusdóttir ◽  
A. Lundin ◽  
...  

In this pilot study, conventional and digital radiography of the chest was compared in 170 patients. Two digitized radiographs, one frequency modified and one simulating the conventional film-screen combination, and the conventional films were reviewed independently by 5 radiologists with different experience. In spite of the smaller size and lower spatial resolution of the digitized compared with the conventional radiograph, only slight differences were revealed in the observation of different pulmonary and mediastinal changes. Digitized radiography is therefore considered suitable for chest examinations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document