Whole vertebral bone segmentation method with a statistical intensity-shape model based approach

Author(s):  
Shouhei Hanaoka ◽  
Karl Fritscher ◽  
Benedikt Schuler ◽  
Yoshitaka Masutani ◽  
Naoto Hayashi ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (03) ◽  
pp. 484-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asger Hobolth ◽  
Eva B. Vedel Jensen

Recently, systematic sampling on the circle and the sphere has been studied by Gual-Arnau and Cruz-Orive (2000) from a design-based point of view. In this note, it is shown that their mathematical model for the covariogram is, in a model-based statistical setting, a special case of the p-order shape model suggested by Hobolth, Pedersen and Jensen (2000) and Hobolth, Kent and Dryden (2002) for planar objects without landmarks. Benefits of this observation include an alternative variance estimator, applicable in the original problem of systematic sampling. In a wider perspective, the paper contributes to the discussion concerning design-based versus model-based stereology.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 1298-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinghao Zhou ◽  
Sung Kim ◽  
Salma Jabbour ◽  
Sharad Goyal ◽  
Bruce Haffty ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurman Gill ◽  
Reinhard R. Beichel

Dynamic and longitudinal lung CT imaging produce 4D lung image data sets, enabling applications like radiation treatment planning or assessment of response to treatment of lung diseases. In this paper, we present a 4D lung segmentation method that mutually utilizes all individual CT volumes to derive segmentations for each CT data set. Our approach is based on a 3D robust active shape model and extends it to fully utilize 4D lung image data sets. This yields an initial segmentation for the 4D volume, which is then refined by using a 4D optimal surface finding algorithm. The approach was evaluated on a diverse set of 152 CT scans of normal and diseased lungs, consisting of total lung capacity and functional residual capacity scan pairs. In addition, a comparison to a 3D segmentation method and a registration based 4D lung segmentation approach was performed. The proposed 4D method obtained an average Dice coefficient of0.9773±0.0254, which was statistically significantly better (pvalue≪0.001) than the 3D method (0.9659±0.0517). Compared to the registration based 4D method, our method obtained better or similar performance, but was 58.6% faster. Also, the method can be easily expanded to process 4D CT data sets consisting of several volumes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document