Fully automatic segmentation of complex organ systems: example of trachea, esophagus and heart segmentation in CT images

Author(s):  
Carsten Meyer ◽  
Jochen Peters ◽  
Jürgen Weese
2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (6Part8) ◽  
pp. 3453-3453
Author(s):  
M Gao ◽  
D Wei ◽  
S Chen

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 5472-5474

Interpretation of CT Lung images by the radiologist can be enhanced to a greater extent by automatic segmentation of nodules. The efficiency of this interpretation depends on the completeness and non-ambiguousness of the CT Lung images. Here, a fully automatic cascaded basis was proposed for CT Lung image segmentation. In this proposal a customized FCN was used feature extractions exploration from many visual scales and differentiate anatomy with a thick forecast map. Widespread experimental outcomes demonstrate that this technique can address the incompleteness in boundary and this technique can achieve best accuracy in segmentation of Lung CT Images when compared to other techniques which address the same area


10.29007/ds5r ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoyan Zheng

We present a fully automatic method of segmenting and landmarking hip CT images for planning of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Our method consists of two stages, i.e., the segmentation stage and the landmarking stage. At the segmentation stage, a multi-atlas segmentation constrained graph method is employed to fully automatically segment both the pelvis and the bilateral proximal femurs from the input CT data. The segmentation stage is followed by the landmarking stage, where a set of pre-defined landmarks are transferred from generic models of the associated hip structures to the input CT space via non-rigid registrations in order to compute a set of functional parameters that are relevant to planning of THA. Evaluated on 20 hip patients, we computed both the segmentation accuracy and the landmarking accuracy. An average segmentation error of 0.38 ± 0.25 mm and 0.49 ± 0.22 mm was found for the hemi-pelvis and for the proximal femurs, respectively. For 3D landmarking, a mean error of 1.58 ± 0.87 mm and 0.46 ± 0.39 mm was found for the acetabular rim center and the acetabular rim radius, respectively; a mean error of 0.74±0.45o was found for the orientation of the anterior pelvic plane; and a mean error of 3.14 ± 1.90 mm and 2.04 ± 1.61 mm was found for the femoral head center and the femoral offset, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document