Effects of projection-view distributions on image quality of calcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) reconstruction

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Lu ◽  
Heang-Ping Chan ◽  
Mitch Goodsitt ◽  
Jun Wei ◽  
Lubomir Hadjiiski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Projection View

scholarly journals Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: Effects of projection-view distributions

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 5703-5712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Lu ◽  
Heang-Ping Chan ◽  
Jun Wei ◽  
Mitch Goodsitt ◽  
Paul L. Carson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Projection View

scholarly journals Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117822341770338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieun Byun ◽  
Jee Eun Lee ◽  
Eun Suk Cha ◽  
Jin Chung ◽  
Jeoung Hyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Kappa Statistic ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
Better Than

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the visibility of microcalcifications of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) using breast specimens. Materials And Methods: Thirty-one specimens’ DBT and FFDM were retrospectively reviewed by four readers. Results: The image quality of microcalcifications of DBT was rated as superior or equivalent in 71.0% by reader 1, 67.8% by reader 2, 64.5% by reader 3, and 80.6% by reader 4. The Fleiss kappa statistic for agreement among readers was 0.31. Conclusions: We suggest that image quality of DBT appears to be comparable with or better than FFDM in terms of revealing microcalcifications.

scholarly journals Preliminary Clinical Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stamatia V. Destounis ◽  
Andrea L. Arieno ◽  
Renee C. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
Institutional Review

Objectives: To compare the visualization and image quality of microcalcifications imaged with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus conventional digital mammography. Materials and Methods: Patients with microcalcifications detected on full field digital mammography (FFDM) recommended for needle core biopsy were enrolled in the study after obtaining patient's consent and institutional review board approval (n = 177 patients, 179 lesions). All had a bilateral combination DBT exam, after undergoing routine digital mammography, prior to biopsy. The study radiologist reviewed the FFDM and DBT images in a non-blinded comparison and assessed the visibility of the microcalcifications with both methods, including image quality and clarity with which the calcifications were seen. Data recorded included patient demographics, lesion size on FFDM, DBT, and surgical excision (when applicable), biopsy, and surgical pathology, if any. Results: Average lesion size on DBT was 1.5 cm; average lesion size on FFDM was 1.4 cm. The image quality of DBT was assessed as equivalent or superior in 92.2% of cases. In 7.8% of the cases, the FFDM image quality was assessed as equivalent or superior. Conclusion: In our review, DBT image quality appears to be comparable to or better than conventional FFDM in terms of demonstrating microcalcifications, as shown in 92.2% of cases.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Clinical Operations

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-126
Author(s):  
Sarah M Friedewald ◽  
Sonya Bhole ◽  
Lilian Wang ◽  
Dipti Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Mandated Training ◽  
Process Understanding ◽  
Quality Imaging

Abstract Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is rapidly becoming the standard of care for breast cancer screening. Implementing DBT into practice is relatively straightforward. However, there are important elements of the transition that one must consider to facilitate this process. Understanding the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard for DBT, as well as how images are displayed, is critical to a successful transition. Standardization of these processes will allow easier transmission of images from facility to facility, and limit the potential for errors in interpretation. Additionally, recent changes in federal regulations will require compliance with mandated training for the radiologist, technologist, and physicist, as well as accreditation for each DBT unit. These regulations aim to ensure high-quality imaging across the country as has been previously seen with standard digital mammography. Synthesized imaging is the most recent improvement for DBT, potentially obviating the need for a simultaneous traditional digital mammogram exposure. Studies have demonstrated near equivalent performance when comparing the combination imaging of DBT and digital mammography versus DBT combined with synthetic imaging. As the quality of the synthetic images continues to improve, it is increasingly likely that it will replace the traditional mammogram. Adherence to DBT-specific parameters will enhance the physician experience and ultimately translate to increased cancer detection and fewer false positive examinations, benefiting all women who are screened for breast cancer.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Image Quality and Dose Saving of the Synthesized Image

2014 ◽  
pp. 150-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Garayoa ◽  
Irene Hernandez-Giron ◽  
Maria Castillo ◽  
Julio Valverde ◽  
Margarita Chevalier
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Dose Saving
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document