High-power blue LED light source system

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Liang ◽  
Yibo Zheng ◽  
Qiang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Blue Led ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4035
Author(s):  
Jinsheon Kim ◽  
Jeungmo Kang ◽  
Woojin Jang

In the case of light-emitting diode (LED) seaport luminaires, they should be designed in consideration of glare, average illuminance, and overall uniformity. Although it is possible to implement light distribution through auxiliary devices such as reflectors, it means increasing the weight and size of the luminaire, which reduces the feasibility. Considering the special environment of seaport luminaires, which are installed at a height of 30 m or more, it is necessary to reduce the weight of the device, facilitate replacement, and secure a light source with a long life. In this paper, an optimized lens design was investigated to provide uniform light distribution to meet the requirement in the seaport lighting application. Four types of lens were designed and fabricated to verify the uniform light distribution requirement for the seaport lighting application. Using numerical analysis, we optimized the lens that provides the required minimum overall uniformity for the seaport lighting application. A theoretical analysis for the heatsink structure and shape were conducted to reduce the heat from the high-power LED light sources up to 250 W. As a result of these analyses on the heat dissipation characteristics of the high-power LED light source used in the LED seaport luminaire, the heatsink with hexagonal-shape fins shows the best heat dissipation effect. Finally, a prototype LED seaport luminaire with an optimized lens and heat sink was fabricated and tested in a real seaport environment. The light distribution characteristics of this prototype LED seaport luminaire were compared with a commercial high-pressure sodium luminaire and metal halide luminaire.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwei Liu ◽  
Dandan Yu ◽  
Pingjuan Niu ◽  
Zanyun Zhang ◽  
Kai Guo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 376-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Rauch ◽  
S. Schmidt ◽  
I. W. C. E. Arends ◽  
K. Oppelt ◽  
S. Kara ◽  
...  

The photocatalytic oxidation of NADH using a flavin photocatalyst and a simple blue LED light source is reported.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz P. Wenzl ◽  
Christian Sommer ◽  
Ladislav Kuna ◽  
Ernst Zinterl ◽  
Joachim R. Krenn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayed Mostafa Mousavinasab ◽  
Ian Meyers

ABSTRACTObjectives: To compare curing performance of a second generation LED curing light with a high power tungsten quartz halogen (QTH). Methods: A hybrid composite resin (Filtek Z 250, 3M, USA) was used as test material and cured using a second generation LED light (Translux Power BlueTM, Heraus Kulzer ,Germany) or a very high power QTH light unit (EMS, Switzerland). A two split aluminum mold was used to prepare ten samples with LED light source cured for forty seconds and ten samples prepared using high power QTH light unit, cured for four or six seconds recommended exposure time. Hardness, depth of cure (DOC) and thermal rise during exposure time by these light sources were measured. The data submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey's and student's t tests at 5% significance level. Results: Significant differences were found in hardness, DOC of samples cured by above mentioned light sources and also in thermal rises during exposure time. The curing performance of the tested QTH was not as well as the LED light. TPB light source produced the maximum hardness (81.25, 73.29, 65.49,55.83 and 24.53 for 0 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm intervals) and DOC (2.64 mm) values with forty seconds irradiation time and the high power (QTH) the least hardness (73.27, 61.51 and 31.59 for 0 mm, 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively) and DOC (2 mm) values with four seconds irradiation time.Thermal rises during 4 s and 6 s curing time using high power QTH and tested LED were 1.88˚C, 3˚C and 1.87˚C, respectively. Conclusions: The used high power LED light produced greater hardness and depth of cure during forty seconds exposure time compared to high power QTH light with four or six seconds curing time. Thermal rise during 6 s curing time with QTH was greater compared to thermal changes occurred during 40 s curing time with tested LED light source. There was no difference seen in thermal changes caused by LED light with 40 s and QTH light with 4 s exposure time. (Eur J Dent 2011;5:299- 304)


Author(s):  
Denis de C. Pereira ◽  
Wesley J. de Paula ◽  
Pedro L. Tavares ◽  
Bruno T. Rosa ◽  
Bruno H. Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document