scholarly journals Energy migration in molecular assemblies: the characterisation and differentiation of two-photon mechanisms

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Bradshaw ◽  
David L. Andrews
2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1917
Author(s):  
Oleg Opanasyuk ◽  
Therese Mikaelsson ◽  
Linus Ryderfors ◽  
Emad Mukhtar ◽  
Lennart B.-Å. Johansson

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (33) ◽  
pp. 7152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg Opanasyuk ◽  
Linus Ryderfors ◽  
Emad Mukhtar ◽  
Lennart B.-Å. Johansson

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (31) ◽  
pp. 5354-5370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Yanai ◽  
Nobuo Kimizuka

This Feature Article reviews an emerging field of triplet energy migration-based photon upconversion (TEM-UC) that allows highly efficient photon upconversion at low excitation power.


2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 655-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Yanai ◽  
Nobuo Kimizuka

Correction for ‘Recent emergence of photon upconversion based on triplet energy migration in molecular assemblies’ by Nobuhiro Yanai et al., Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 5354–5370.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Villatoro ◽  
Leonardo Muñoz-Rugeles ◽  
Jesús Durán-Hernández ◽  
Bernardo Salcido-Santacruz ◽  
Nuria Esturau-Escofet ◽  
...  

Upon two photon excitation, energy migration from the antenna-localized second singlet excited state to the stilbenyl-azopyrrole section allows for efficient indirect excitation and phototransformation of this actuator.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 5224-5229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Kouno ◽  
Taku Ogawa ◽  
Shogo Amemori ◽  
Prasenjit Mahato ◽  
Nobuhiro Yanai ◽  
...  

A molecular self-assembly approach is developed to resolve an outstanding issue in triplet energy migration-based photon upconversion (TEM-UC), that is, air-stable TEM-UC in water.


Author(s):  
David W. Piston ◽  
Brian D. Bennett ◽  
Robert G. Summers

Two-photon excitation microscopy (TPEM) provides attractive advantages over confocal microscopy for three-dimensionally resolved fluorescence imaging and photochemistry. Two-photon excitation arises from the simultaneous absorption of two photons in a single quantitized event whose probability is proportional to the square of the instantaneous intensity. For example, two red photons can cause the transition to an excited electronic state normally reached by absorption in the ultraviolet. In practice, two-photon excitation is made possible by the very high local instantaneous intensity provided by a combination of diffraction-limited focusing of a single laser beam in the microscope and the temporal concentration of 100 femtosecond pulses generated by a mode-locked laser. Resultant peak excitation intensities are 106 times greater than the CW intensities used in confocal microscopy, but the pulse duty cycle of 10-5 maintains the average input power on the order of 10 mW, only slightly greater than the power normally used in confocal microscopy.


Author(s):  
David W. Piston

Two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy provides attractive advantages over confocal microscopy for three-dimensionally resolved fluorescence imaging. Two-photon excitation arises from the simultaneous absorption of two photons in a single quantitized event whose probability is proportional to the square of the instantaneous intensity. For example, two red photons can cause the transition to an excited electronic state normally reached by absorption in the ultraviolet. In our fluorescence experiments, the final excited state is the same singlet state that is populated during a conventional fluorescence experiment. Thus, the fluorophore exhibits the same emission properties (e.g. wavelength shifts, environmental sensitivity) used in typical biological microscopy studies. In practice, two-photon excitation is made possible by the very high local instantaneous intensity provided by a combination of diffraction-limited focusing of a single laser beam in the microscope and the temporal concentration of 100 femtosecond pulses generated by a mode-locked laser. Resultant peak excitation intensities are 106 times greater than the CW intensities used in confocal microscopy, but the pulse duty cycle of 10−5 maintains the average input power on the order of 10 mW, only slightly greater than the power normally used in confocal microscopy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document