scholarly journals Local luminance effect on spatial summation in the foveal vision and its implication on image artifact classification

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chien-Chung Chen ◽  
San-Yuan Lin ◽  
Hui-Ya G. Han ◽  
Sheng-Tzung Kuo ◽  
Kuo-Chung Huang
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Foveal Vision ◽  
Image Artifact ◽  
Luminance Effect

Unsupervised foveal vision neural architecture with top-down attention

2021 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 145-159
Author(s):  
Ryan Burt ◽  
Nina N. Thigpen ◽  
Andreas Keil ◽  
Jose C. Principe
Keyword(s):  
Foveal Vision ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Neural Architecture

scholarly journals Vision as oculomotor reward: cognitive contributions to the dynamic control of saccadic eye movements

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Wolf ◽  
Markus Lappe
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Dynamic Control ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Cognitive Mechanisms ◽  
Foveal Vision ◽  
Subsequent Behavior ◽  
High Level

AbstractHumans and other primates are equipped with a foveated visual system. As a consequence, we reorient our fovea to objects and targets in the visual field that are conspicuous or that we consider relevant or worth looking at. These reorientations are achieved by means of saccadic eye movements. Where we saccade to depends on various low-level factors such as a targets’ luminance but also crucially on high-level factors like the expected reward or a targets’ relevance for perception and subsequent behavior. Here, we review recent findings how the control of saccadic eye movements is influenced by higher-level cognitive processes. We first describe the pathways by which cognitive contributions can influence the neural oculomotor circuit. Second, we summarize what saccade parameters reveal about cognitive mechanisms, particularly saccade latencies, saccade kinematics and changes in saccade gain. Finally, we review findings on what renders a saccade target valuable, as reflected in oculomotor behavior. We emphasize that foveal vision of the target after the saccade can constitute an internal reward for the visual system and that this is reflected in oculomotor dynamics that serve to quickly and accurately provide detailed foveal vision of relevant targets in the visual field.

scholarly journals Contrast integration over area is extensive: A three-stage model of spatial summation

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H. Baker ◽  
Tim S. Meese
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Stage Model

Spatial summation of perceived pressure, sharpness and mechanically evoked cutaneous pain

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOEL GREENSPAN1 ◽  
MARIA THOMADAKI ◽  
SANDRA McGILLIS
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Cutaneous Pain ◽  
Perceived Pressure

Spatial summation of heat-induced pain: influence of stimulus area and spatial separation of stimuli on perceived pain sensation intensity and unpleasantness

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1270-1279 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Price ◽  
J. G. McHaffie ◽  
M. A. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Stimulus Size ◽  
Experimental Series ◽  
Pain Sensation ◽  
Thermal Probe ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Nociceptive Neurons ◽  
Thermal Probes ◽  
Perceived Pain ◽  
Thermal Stimuli

1. Psychophysical experiments were initiated to determine the possible influence of increasing stimulus size on perceived pain intensity. Six trained human subjects (5 male, 1 female) made visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings for pain-sensation intensity and unpleasantness in response to nociceptive thermal stimuli. Test stimuli consisted of 5-s duration heat pulses (45-50 degrees C in 1 degrees increments) delivered by one, two, or three contact thermal probes (1 cm2 each) applied to the medial aspect of the anterior forearm. 2. The area of skin receiving noxious thermal stimuli was changed by randomly varying the number of thermodes activated. The effects of varying the distance between the thermal probes also were evaluated. In the first series of experiments, thermal-probe separation was kept close to 0; in subsequent experimental series, the thermodes were separated by either 5 or 10 cm. 3. In each experimental series, considerable spatial summation occurred in both pain-sensation intensity and unpleasantness dimensions of pain. This summation occurred throughout the nociceptive thermal range of 45-50 degrees C and was larger at suprathreshold temperatures (greater than or equal to 47 degrees C) than those near threshold (less than or equal to 46 degrees C). Unlike spatial summation of perceived warmth, that of pain was not characterized by systematic changes in power-function exponents but as approximately upward parallel displacements in double-logarithmic coordinates. 4. Thermal-probe separation over a range of 0-10 cm had no effects on spatial summation of pain-sensation intensity or pain unpleasantness. In contrast, increasing thermal-probe separation increased the subjects' ability to discriminate differences in stimulus size and their ability to detect correctly the number of thermal probes activated. 5. Because affective VAS ratings of unpleasantness were linearly related to, but distinctly and systematically less than, VAS ratings of pain-sensation intensity, it was clear that subjects responded quite differently to these two pain dimensions. Affective judgements were not additionally influenced by thermal probe separation and hence by the ability to perceive stimulus size or number of thermal probes activated. 6. The results indicate that powerful spatial-summation mechanisms exist for heat-induced pain. Spatial summation of pain is likely to be subserved both by local integration mechanisms at the level of single spinothalamic-tract neurons and by recruitment of central nociceptive neurons, because spatial summation of pain occurred to approximately equal extents under conditions of thermode separations over a distance of at least 20 cm.

scholarly journals Comparison between Widefield Optical Coherence Tomography Devices in Eyes with High Myopia

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 658
Author(s):  
Federico Corvi ◽  
Federico Zicarelli ◽  
Matteo Airaldi ◽  
Salvatore Parrulli ◽  
Mariano Cozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Horizontal Line ◽  
Optical Coherence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Swept Source ◽  
Image Artifact ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
And Control

Background: To compare four different optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices for visualization of retinal and subretinal layers in highly myopic eyes. Methods: In this prospective, observational, cross-sectional study, consecutive patients with high myopia and control subjects were imaged by four OCT devices: Spectralis OCT2, PlexElite 2.0 100 kHz, PlexElite 2.0 200 kHz and the Canon Xephilio OCT-S1. The acquisition protocol for comparison consisted of single vertical and horizontal line scans centered on the fovea. Comparison between the devices in the extent of visible retina, presence of conjugate image or mirror artifacts, visibility of the sclerochoroidal interface and retrobulbar tissue. Results: 30 eyes with high myopia and 30 control subjects were analyzed. The visualized RPE length was significantly different between the OCT devices with Xephilio OCT-S1 imaging the largest extent (p < 0.0001). The proportion of eyes with conjugate image artifact was significantly higher with the Spectralis OCT (p < 0.0001), and lower with the PlexElite 200 kHz (p < 0.0001). No difference in visibility of the sclerochoroidal interface was noted among instruments. The retrobulbar tissue was visible in a higher proportion of eyes using swept-source PlexElite 100 kHz and 200 kHz (p < 0.007) compared to the other devices. Conclusions: In highly myopic eyes, the four OCT devices demonstrated significant differences in the extent of the retina imaged, in the prevalence of conjugate image artifact, and in the visualization of the retrobulbar tissue.

Temporal summation in foveal vision

1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1477-1481 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Tittarelli ◽  
F.H.C. Marriott
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Foveal Vision
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document