Thin film filter performance for extreme ultraviolet and x-ray applications

1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Forbes R. Powell
1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
John V. Vallerga ◽  
Peter W. Vedder ◽  
Oswald H. W. Siegmund

Author(s):  
Mikelis Svilans ◽  
Stan Debski ◽  
Hongbai Lao ◽  
Krassimir Stoev

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 0131001
Author(s):  
王占山 Wang Zhanshan ◽  
黄秋实 Huang Qiushi ◽  
张众 Zhang Zhong ◽  
伊圣振 Yi Shengzhen ◽  
李文斌 Li Wenbin ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Volodin ◽  
S. A. Gusev ◽  
M. N. Drozdov ◽  
S. Yu. Zuev ◽  
E. B. Klyuenkov ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Vedder ◽  
John V. Vallerga ◽  
James L. Gibson ◽  
Joseph M. Stock ◽  
Oswald H. W. Siegmund

Author(s):  
D. R. Liu ◽  
S. S. Shinozaki ◽  
R. J. Baird

The epitaxially grown (GaAs)Ge thin film has been arousing much interest because it is one of metastable alloys of III-V compound semiconductors with germanium and a possible candidate in optoelectronic applications. It is important to be able to accurately determine the composition of the film, particularly whether or not the GaAs component is in stoichiometry, but x-ray energy dispersive analysis (EDS) cannot meet this need. The thickness of the film is usually about 0.5-1.5 μm. If Kα peaks are used for quantification, the accelerating voltage must be more than 10 kV in order for these peaks to be excited. Under this voltage, the generation depth of x-ray photons approaches 1 μm, as evidenced by a Monte Carlo simulation and actual x-ray intensity measurement as discussed below. If a lower voltage is used to reduce the generation depth, their L peaks have to be used. But these L peaks actually are merged as one big hump simply because the atomic numbers of these three elements are relatively small and close together, and the EDS energy resolution is limited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document