Comparison of total column ozone measurements obtained from a global UV spectroradiometer with those from a Dobson spectrophotometer at Melbourne Australia

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don J. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column ◽  
Dobson Spectrophotometer

scholarly journals Total column ozone measurements by the Dobson spectrophotometer at Belsk (Poland) for the period 1963–2019: homogenization and adjustment to the Brewer spectrophotometer

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 4425-4436
Author(s):  
Janusz W. Krzyścin ◽  
Bonawentura Rajewska-Więch ◽  
Janusz Jarosławski
Keyword(s):  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Long Term Stability ◽  
Ultraviolet Range ◽  
Brewer Spectrophotometer ◽  
World Standard ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column ◽  
Dobson Spectrophotometer

Abstract. The total column ozone (TCO3) measurements by the Dobson spectrophotometer (serial no. 84) have been carried out at Belsk station (51∘50′ N, 20∘47′ E), Poland, since 23 March 1963. In total, ∼115 000 intraday manual observations were made by 31 December 2019. These observations were performed for different combinations of double wavelength pairs in the ultraviolet range and observation types, i.e., direct sun (DS), zenith blue (ZB), and zenith cloudy (ZC) depending on weather conditions. The long-term stability of the instrument was supported by frequent (almost every 4 years) intercomparisons with the world standard spectrophotometer. Trend analyses, based on the monthly and yearly averaged TCO3, can be carried out without any additional corrections to the intraday values. To adjust these data to the Brewer spectrophotometer observations, which were also performed at Belsk, a procedure is proposed to account for less accurate Dobson observations under low solar elevation, presence of clouds, and the temperature dependence of ozone absorption. The adjusted time series shows that the Brewer–Dobson monthly averaged differences are in the range of about ±0.5 %. The intraday TCO3 database, divided into three periods (1963–1979, 1980–1999, and 2000–2019), is freely available at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.919378 (Rajewska-Więch et al., 2020).

scholarly journals Total column ozone measurements by the Dobson spectrophotometer at Belsk (Poland) for the period 1963–2019: homogenization and adjustment to the Brewer spectrophotometer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janusz W. Krzyścin ◽  
Bonawentura Rajewska-Więch ◽  
Janusz Jarosławski
Keyword(s):  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Long Term Stability ◽  
Brewer Spectrophotometer ◽  
World Standard ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column ◽  
Dobson Spectrophotometer ◽  
Uv Range

Abstract. The total column ozone (TCO3) measurements by the Dobson spectrophotometer #84 have been carried out at Belsk (51°50', 20°47'), Poland, since March 23, 1963. In total, ~115,000 intra-day manual observations have been taken up to December 31, 2019. These observations were made for various combinations of double wavelength pairs in UV range (AD, CD) and the observation category, i.e., direct Sun, zenith blue, and zenith cloudy depending on the weather conditions. The long-term stability of the instrument was supported by frequent (~almost every 4 yr.) intercomparisons with the world standard spectrophotometers. Trend analyses, based on the monthly and yearly averaged TCO3, can be carried out without any additional corrections to the intraday values. To adjust this data to the Brewer spectrophotometer observations also performed at Belsk, a procedure is proposed to account for: less accurate Dobson observations under low solar elevation, presence of clouds, and sensitivity of the ozone absorption on temperature. The adjusted time series shows that the Brewer-Dobson monthly averaged differences are in the range of about ±0.5 %. The intra-day TCO3 data base, divided into three periods (1963–1979, 1980–1999, and 2000–2019), is freely available at https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.919378 (Rajewska-Więch et al., 2020).

scholarly journals Spatial mapping of ground-based observations of total ozone

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 4487-4505 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.-L. Chang ◽  
S. Guillas ◽  
V. E. Fioletov
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Interpolation ◽  
Stochastic Partial Differential Equation ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Source Of Information ◽  
Total Column ◽  
Ozone Levels

Abstract. Total column ozone variations estimated using ground-based stations provide important independent source of information in addition to satellite-based estimates. This estimation has been vigorously challenged by data inhomogeneity in time and by the irregularity of the spatial distribution of stations, as well as by interruptions in observation records. Furthermore, some stations have calibration issues and thus observations may drift. In this paper we compare the spatial interpolation of ozone levels using the novel stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) approach with the covariance-based kriging. We show how these new spatial predictions are more accurate, less uncertain and more robust. We construct long-term zonal means to investigate the robustness against the absence of measurements at some stations as well as instruments drifts. We conclude that time series analyzes can benefit from the SPDE approach compared to the covariance-based kriging when stations are missing, but the positive impact of the technique is less pronounced in the case of drifts.

scholarly journals Characterizing ozone throughout the atmospheric column over the tropical Andes from in situ and remote sensing observations

Elem Sci Anth ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
María Cazorla ◽  
René Parra ◽  
Edgar Herrera ◽  
Francisco Raimundo da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Atmospheric Ozone ◽  
Tropical Andes ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Boundary Layer Height ◽  
Mixing Ratios ◽  
The Andes ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

In this study, we characterize atmospheric ozone over the tropical Andes in the boundary layer, the free troposphere, and the stratosphere; we quantify each contribution to total column ozone, and we evaluate the performance of the multi-sensor reanalysis (MSR2) in the region. Thus, we present data taken in Ecuador and Peru (2014–2019). The contribution from the surface was determined by integrating ozone concentrations measured in Quito and Cuenca (Ecuador) up to boundary layer height. In addition, tropospheric and stratospheric column ozone were quantified from ozone soundings (38) launched from Quito during the study time period. Profiles were compared against soundings at Natal (SHADOZ network) for being the closest observational reference with sufficient data in 2014–2019. Data were also compared against stratospheric mixing ratios from the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (Aura MLS). Findings demonstrate that the stratospheric component of total column ozone over the Andes (225.2 ± 8.9 Dobson Units [DU]) is at similar levels as those observed at Natal (223.3 ± 8.6 DU), and observations are comparable to Aura MLS data. In contrast, the tropospheric contribution is lower over the Andes (20.2 ± 4.3 DU) when compared to Natal (35.4 ± 6.4 DU) due to a less deep and cleaner troposphere. From sounding extrapolation of Quito profiles down to sea level, we determined that altitude deducts about 5–7 DU from the total column, which coincides with a 3%–4% overestimation of the MSR2 over Quito and Marcapomacocha (Peru). In addition, when MSR2 data are compared along a transect that crosses from the Amazon over Quito, the Ecuadorian coast side, and into the Pacific, observations are not significantly different among the three first locations. Results point to coarse reanalysis resolution not being suitable to resolve the formidable altitude transition imposed by the Andes mountain chain. This work advances our knowledge of atmospheric ozone over the study region and provides a robust time series of upper air measurements for future evaluations of satellite and reanalysis products.

scholarly journals Comparison of profile total ozone from SBUV(v8.6) with GOME-type and ground-based total ozone for 16-yr period (1996 to 2011)

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 10081-10115 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. W. Chiou ◽  
P. K. Bhartia ◽  
R. D. McPeters ◽  
D. G. Loyola ◽  
M. Coldewey-Egbers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Total Ozone ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Monthly Data ◽  
Latitude Band ◽  
Ozone Data ◽  
Standard Deviations ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. This paper describes the comparison of the variability of total column ozone inferred from the three independent multi-year data records, namely, (i) SBUV(v8.6) profile total ozone, (ii) GTO(GOME-Type total ozone), and (iii) Ground-based total ozone data records covering the 16-yr overlap period (March 1996 through June 2011). Analyses are conducted based on area weighted zonal means for (0–30° S), (0–30° N), (50–30° S), and (30–60° N). It has been found that on average, the differences in monthly zonal mean total ozone vary between −0.32 to 0.76 % and are well within 1%. For "GTO minus SBUV", the standard deviations and ranges (maximum minus minimum) of the differences regarding monthly zonal mean total ozone vary between 0.58 to 0.66% and 2.83 to 3.82% respectively, depending on the latitude band. The corresponding standard deviations and ranges regarding the differences in monthly zonal mean anomalies show values between 0.40 to 0.59% and 2.19 to 3.53%. The standard deviations and ranges of the differences "Ground-based minus SBUV" regarding both monthly zonal means and anomalies are larger by a factor of 1.4 to 2.9 in comparison to "GTO minus SBUV". The Ground-based zonal means, while show no systematic differences, demonstrate larger scattering of monthly data compared to satellite-based records. The differences in the scattering are significantly reduced if seasonal zonal averages are analyzed. The trends of the differences "GTO minus SBUV" and "Ground-based minus SBUV" are found to vary between −0.04 and 0.12% yr−1 (−0.11 and 0.31 DU yr−1). These negligibly small trends have provided strong evidence that there are no significant time dependent differences among these multi-year total ozone data records. Analyses of the deviations from pre-1980 level indicate that for the overlap period of 1996 to 2010, all three data records show gradual recovery at (30–60° N) from −5% in 1996 to −2% in 2010. The corresponding recovery at (50–30° S) is not as obvious until after 2006.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document