Experimental performance study of wireless ad hoc system utilizing 802.11a standard base on different routing protocols

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao F. Zhong ◽  
You-Zheng Wang ◽  
Shunliang Mei ◽  
Jing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Experimental Performance ◽  
Standard Base

scholarly journals MANET Routing Protocols Evaluation: AODV, DSR and DSDV Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 06024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad Taha AL-Dhief ◽  
Naseer Sabri ◽  
M.S. Salim ◽  
S. Fouad ◽  
S. A. Aljunid
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Access Point ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Network Simulator ◽  
Mobile Nodes ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Distance Vector

Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is a set of mobile nodes that communicate with each other to configure an immediate network without utilizing any of infrastructure, the centralized access point or centralized administration in multiple hop manner. There are a lot of routing protocols have been proposed in MANET which are different from each other in the performance and the mechanism. Therefore, the performance study of those protocols in different scenarios is needed. This paper presents the performance comparison between Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad hoc on demand distance Vector Routing (AODV) as reactive routing protocols and Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) as a proactive routing protocol to precisely determine which protocol is more effective. Network Simulator (NS) version 2.35 has used to simulate and evaluate the performance of these protocols in terms of the packet delivery ratio, average throughput, average end-to-end delay, and packet loss ratio with respect to the variable number of nodes.

scholarly journals Designing an Adversarial Model Against Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols in MANETS: A Comparative Performance Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Peda Gopi ◽  
E. Suresh Babu ◽  
C. Naga Raju ◽  
S. Ashok Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Mobile Nodes ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Wormhole Attack ◽  
Self Organized ◽  
Proactive Routing ◽  
Hoc Networks ◽  
Adversarial Model

Mobile ad-hoc networks are self-organized infrastructure less networks that consists of mobile nodes, which are capable of maintaining and forming the network by themselves. Recently, researchers are designed several routing protocols on these networks. However, these routing protocols are more vulnerable to attacks from the intruders, which can easily paralyze the operation of the network due to its inherited characteristics of MANETS. One such type of attack is wormhole attack. Because of its severity, the wormhole attack has attracted a great deal of attention in the research community. This paper compares reactive and proactive routing protocols in adversarial environment. Specifically, wormhole attack is applied to these routing protocols to evaluate its performance through simulation. Comprehensively the results shows the comparative performance of these protocols against wormhole attack is hard to detect and easy to implement.

scholarly journals Comparative Performance Simulation of DSDV AODV and DSR MANET Protocols in NS2

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31
Author(s):  
Erion Cana
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Pause Time ◽  
Mobile Nodes ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Hoc Networks ◽  
High Flexibility

Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) are self-configured and infrastructure less networks with autonomous mobile nodes. Due to the high flexibility, these kind of networks are heavily used in rescue operations, military missions etc. Many routing protocols for this kind of networks exist. This article presents a comparative and quantitative performance study of DSDV, AODV and DSR routing protocols using different simulation models in NS2. Performance metrics like PDR, E2E Delay and Throughput are analyzed under varying network, traffic and mobility parameters like number of nodes, traffic flows, mobility speed and pause time. Results show that AODV outperforms DSDV and DSR in all the performance metrics. DSDV performs better than DSR in terms of PDR and E2E delay. DSR gives 20-30 higher Throughput than DSDV. Performance metrics are highly influenced by network topology parameters like number of nodes and number of traffic flow connections. Mobility parameters like speed and pause time have slight impact on performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document