Analytical noise and slice-sensitivity-profile models for multislice helical CT

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Helical Ct ◽  
Multislice Helical Ct ◽  
Slice Sensitivity Profile ◽  
Sensitivity Profile

Metal artifact suppression from reformatted projections in multislice helical CT using dual-front active contours

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 5155-5164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Li ◽  
Lifeng Yu ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
Joel G. Fletcher ◽  
Cynthia H. McCollough
Keyword(s):  
Active Contours ◽  
Helical Ct ◽  
Metal Artifact ◽  
Artifact Suppression ◽  
Multislice Helical Ct

Multislice Helical CT in the Diagnosis of Pharyngovertebral Fistula Due to Loosening of Anterior Screw-Plate Construct

Orthopedics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Zafer Ünsal Coskun ◽  
Serkan Bilgiç ◽  
Özkan Köse
Keyword(s):  
Helical Ct ◽  
Multislice Helical Ct

Effect of Scan Delay on Hepatic Enhancement for Pediatric Abdominal Multislice Helical CT

2001 ◽  
Vol 176 (6) ◽  
pp. 1559-1561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald P. Frush ◽  
Lane F. Donnelly ◽  
George S. Bisset
Keyword(s):  
Helical Ct ◽  
Multislice Helical Ct

scholarly journals Automated slice sensitivity profile measurement of the CT image of the AAPM CT performance phantom: Which stair object should be used?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nani Lasiyah ◽  
Choirul Anam ◽  
Eko Hidayanto ◽  
Geoff Dougherty
Keyword(s):  
Profile Measurement ◽  
Slice Thickness ◽  
Ct Image ◽  
Full Width ◽  
Half Maximum ◽  
Ct Scanner ◽  
Automated Measurements ◽  
Slice Sensitivity Profile ◽  
Sensitivity Profile ◽  
Improved Algorithm

Abstract Purpose: We used an improved algorithm to automatically measure the slice sensitivity profile (SSP) and its full-width at half maximum (FWHM) from all three stair objects within an image of the AAPM CT performance phantom.Methods: The phantom was scanned with a Philips Ingenuity 128-slice CT scanner using slice thicknesses of 1 mm and 5 mm. The three stair objects were named top #1, middle #2, and bottom #3. The software was able to measure the SSP and its FWHM form object #1, #2, #3, and all objects. The SSPs and FWHMs from each stair object were compared with manual measurements. Results: The FWHM values for a slice thickness of 1 mm were 1.3 ± 0.1 mm for all the stair objects. The FWHM values for a slice thickness of 5 mm were 5.2 ± 0.1 mm, 5.1 ± 0.3 mm, 5.2 ± 0.1 mm for the top, bottom, and middle stair objects, respectively. The results of manual measurements had the same trend as those of the automated measurements.Conclusion: The improved algorithm for measuring SSP and its FWHM from any stair object within the AAPM performance phantom was successfully developed. The SSPs and their FWHM values measured from every stair object were similar (p > 0.05).

Multislice Helical CT to Facilitate Combined CT of the Neck, Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis in Children

2000 ◽  
Vol 174 (6) ◽  
pp. 1620-1622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lane F. Donnelly ◽  
Donald P. Frush ◽  
Rendon C. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Helical Ct ◽  
Multislice Helical Ct

Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Multislice Helical CT Angiography

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 750-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph R. Becker ◽  
Andreas Knez ◽  
Alexander Leber ◽  
Hendrik Treede ◽  
B. Ohnesorge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Helical Ct ◽  
Coronary Artery Stenoses ◽  
Multislice Helical Ct ◽  
Helical Ct Angiography

scholarly journals Variations in slice sensitivity profile for various height settings in tomosynthesis imaging: Phantom study

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 108-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Kuramoto ◽  
Junji Morishita ◽  
Toyoyuki Kato ◽  
Yasuhiko Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Phantom Study ◽  
Slice Sensitivity Profile ◽  
Sensitivity Profile
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document