Optimizing the efficiency of command load inspection for the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) on the Chandra X-ray Telescope

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. DePasquale ◽  
Shanil N. Virani ◽  
Paul P. Plucinsky
2020 ◽  
Vol 494 (3) ◽  
pp. 3784-3789
Author(s):  
J A Toalá ◽  
M A Guerrero ◽  
L Bianchi ◽  
Y-H Chu ◽  
O De Marco

ABSTRACT The Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS-S) camera on board the Chandra X-ray Observatory has been used to discover a hot bubble in the planetary nebula (PN) IC 4593, the most distant PN detected by Chandra so far. The data are used to study the distribution of the X-ray-emitting gas in IC 4593 and to estimate its physical properties. The hot bubble has a radius of ∼2 arcsec and is found to be confined inside the optically bright innermost cavity of IC 4593. The X-ray emission is mostly consistent with that of an optically thin plasma with temperature kT ≈ 0.15 keV (or TX ≈ 1.7 × 106 K), electron density ne ≈ 15 cm−3, and intrinsic X-ray luminosity in the 0.3–1.5 keV energy range LX = 3.4 × 1030 erg s−1. A careful analysis of the distribution of hard (E >0.8 keV) photons in IC 4593 suggests the presence of X-ray emission from a point source likely associated with its central star (CSPN). If this was the case, its estimated X-ray luminosity would be LX, CSPN = 7 × 1029 erg s−1, fulfilling the log(LX, CSPN/Lbol) ≈ −7 relation for self-shocking winds in hot stars. The X-ray detection of the CSPN helps explain the presence of high-ionization species detected in the ultraviolet spectra as predicted by stellar atmosphere models.


1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen E. Jones ◽  
Mark W. Bautz ◽  
Steven E. Kissel ◽  
Michael Pivovaroff

2020 ◽  
Vol 500 (4) ◽  
pp. 4801-4817
Author(s):  
A Danehkar ◽  
M Karovska ◽  
J J Drake ◽  
V L Kashyap

ABSTRACT RT Cru belongs to the rare class of hard X-ray emitting symbiotics, whose origin is not yet fully understood. In this work, we have conducted a detailed spectroscopic analysis of X-ray emission from RT Cru based on observations taken by the Chandra Observatory using the Low Energy Transmission Grating (LETG) on the High-Resolution Camera Spectrometer (HRC-S) in 2015 and the High Energy Transmission Grating (HETG) on the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer S-array (ACIS-S) in 2005. Our thermal plasma modelling of the time-averaged HRC-S/LETG spectrum suggests a mean temperature of kT ∼ 1.3 keV, whereas kT ∼ 9.6 keV according to the time-averaged ACIS-S/HETG. The soft thermal plasma emission component (∼1.3 keV) found in the HRC-S is heavily obscured by dense materials (>5 × 1023 cm−2). The aperiodic variability seen in its light curves could be due to changes in either absorbing material covering the hard X-ray source or intrinsic emission mechanism in the inner layers of the accretion disc. To understand the variability, we extracted the spectra in the ‘low/hard’ and ‘high/soft’ spectral states, which indicated higher plasma temperatures in the low/hard states of both the ACIS-S and HRC-S. The source also has a fluorescent iron emission line at 6.4 keV, likely emitted from reflection off an accretion disc or dense absorber, which was twice as bright in the HRC-S epoch compared to the ACIS-S. The soft thermal component identified in the HRC-S might be an indication of a jet that deserves further evaluations using high-resolution imaging observations.


1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark W. Bautz ◽  
Michael J. Pivovaroff ◽  
F. Baganoff ◽  
Takashi Isobe ◽  
Stephen E. Jones ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon P. Garmire ◽  
Mark W. Bautz ◽  
Peter G. Ford ◽  
John A. Nousek ◽  
George R. Ricker, Jr.

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark W. Bautz ◽  
Steven E. Kissel ◽  
Gregory Y. Prigozhin ◽  
Stephen E. Jones ◽  
Takashi Isobe ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 621 ◽  
pp. A88 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Nevalainen ◽  
E. Tempel ◽  
J. Ahoranta ◽  
L. J. Liivamägi ◽  
M. Bonamente ◽  
...  

The cosmological missing baryons at z <  1 most likely hide in the hot (T ≳ 105.5 K) phase of the warm hot intergalactic medium (WHIM). While the hot WHIM is hard to detect due to its high ionisation level, the warm (T ≲ 105.5 K) phase of the WHIM has been very robustly detected in the far-ultraviolet (FUV) band. We adopted the assumption that the hot and warm WHIM phases are co-located and therefore used the FUV-detected warm WHIM as a tracer for the cosmologically interesting hot WHIM. We performed an X-ray follow-up in the sight line of the blazar PKS 2155–304 at the redshifts where previous FUV measurements of O VI, Si IV, and broad Lyman-alpha (BLA) absorption have indicated the existence of the warm WHIM. We looked for the O VII Heα and O VIII Lyα absorption lines, the most likely hot WHIM tracers. Despite the very large exposure time (≈1 Ms), the Reflection Grating Spectrometer unit 1 (RGS1) on-board XMM-Newton data yielded no significant detection which corresponds to upper limits of log N(O VII(cm−2)) ≤ 14.5−15.2 and log N(O VIII(cm−2)) ≤ 14.5−15.2. An analysis of the data obtained with the combination of the Low Energy Transmission Grating (LETG) and the High Resolution Camera (HRC) on-board Chandra yielded consistent results. However, the data obtained with the LETG, combined with the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) lead to the detection of an feature resembling an absorption line at λ ≈ 20 Å at simple one-parameter confidence level of 3.7σ, consistent with several earlier LETG/ACIS reports. Given the high statistical quality of the RGS1 data, the possibility of RGS1 accidentally missing the true line at λ ∼ 20 Å is very low: 0.006%. Neglecting this, the LETG/ACIS detection can be interpreted as Lyα transition of O VIII at one of the redshifts (z ≈ 0.054) of FUV-detected warm WHIM. Given the very convincing X-ray spectral evidence for and against the existence of the λ ∼ 20 Å feature, we cannot conclude whether or not it is a true astrophysical absorption line. Considering cosmological simulations, the probability of the LETG/ACIS λ ∼ 20 Å feature being due to the astrophysical O VIII absorber co-located with the FUV-detected O VI absorber is at the very low level of ≲0.1%. We cannot completely rule out the very unlikely possibility that the LETG/ACIS 20 Å feature is due to a transient event located close to the blazar.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Dunn ◽  
Jan-Uwe Ness ◽  
Laurent Lamy ◽  
Grant Tremblay ◽  
Graziella Branduard-Raymont ◽  
...  

&lt;p&gt;Within the solar system, X-ray emissions have been detected from every planet except the Ice Giants: Uranus and Neptune. Here, we present three Chandra X-ray Observations of Uranus (each 24-30 ks duration): an Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) observation during solar maximum on 7 August 2002 and two High Resolution Camera (HRC) observations during solar minimum on 11 and 12 November 2017. The ACIS observation from 2002 shows a low signal but statistically significant detection of X-rays from Uranus. The measured Uranus X-ray fluxes of 10&lt;sup&gt;-15&lt;/sup&gt;-10&lt;sup&gt;-16 &lt;/sup&gt;erg/cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;/s from this detection are consistent with upper limits and modelling predictions in previous work (Ness &amp; Schmidt. 2000; Cravens et al. 2006). &amp;#160;The photon energy distribution from this observation is consistent with an X-ray emission from charge exchange or scattering of solar photons, as observed for Jupiter and Saturn. The two HRC observations from 2017 constitute non-detections. For 11 Nov 2017, the X-ray emission coincident with Uranus&amp;#8217; location is dimmer than 98% of the Field of View. 12 November 2017, was also a non-detection, but with tentative hints of planetary X-ray signatures: Uranus was 4 times brighter than the previous day, and brighter than 94% of the Field of View (1.6 standard deviations &gt; Field of View mean). At this time, the Uranus coincident X-ray signature also exhibited timing variation distinct from the field of view. Further and longer observations will be required to better characterise the nature of the X-ray emissions from Uranus.&lt;/p&gt;


2000 ◽  
Vol 534 (2) ◽  
pp. L139-L142 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. K. Townsley ◽  
P. S. Broos ◽  
G. P. Garmire ◽  
J. A. Nousek

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Pivovaroff ◽  
Steven E. Kissel ◽  
Mark W. Bautz ◽  
Gregory Y. Prigozhin ◽  
Takashi Isobe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document