Near-field effects of damage

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish S. Purekar ◽  
Darryll J. Pines
Keyword(s):  
Near Field ◽  
Field Effects

NEAR-FIELD EFFECTS OF RESONANT WIRE ANTENNAS

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (18) ◽  
pp. 1615-1622
Author(s):  
R. I. Tsekhmistro ◽  
N. N. Gorobets
Keyword(s):  
Near Field ◽  
Field Effects ◽  
Wire Antennas

scholarly journals Numerical modelling of historical landslide-generated tsunamis in the French Lesser Antilles

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1281-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Poisson ◽  
R. Pedreros
Keyword(s):  
Near Field ◽  
Pyroclastic Flows ◽  
Lesser Antilles ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Tsunami Height ◽  
Tsunami Modelling ◽  
Field Effects ◽  
Wave Heights ◽  
Unique Source ◽  
Height Data

Abstract. Two historical landslide-induced tsunamis that reached the coasts of the French Lesser Antilles are studied. First, the Martinique coast was hit by a tsunami down the western flank of Montagne Pelée at the beginning of the big eruption of May 1902. More recently, the northeastern coast of Guadeloupe was affected by a tsunami that had been generated around Montserrat by pyroclastic flows entering the sea, during the July 2003 eruption of the Soufrière Hills volcano. We use a modified version of the GEOWAVE model to compute numerical simulations of both events. Two source hypotheses are considered for each tsunami. The comparison of the simulation results with reported tsunami height data helps to discriminate between the tested source decriptions. In the Martinique case, we obtain a better fit to data when considering three successive lahars entering the sea, as a simplified single source leads to an overstimation of the tsunami wave heights at the coast. In the Montserrat case, the best model uses a unique source which volume corresponds to published data concerning the peak volume flow. These findings emphasize the importance of an accurate description of the relevant volume as well as the timing sequence of the source event in landslide-generated tsunami modelling. They also show that considering far-field effects in addition to near-field effects may significantly improve tsunami modelling.

Near-field and far-field effects in thermal radiation from metallic carbon nanotubes

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei M. Nemilentsau ◽  
Gregory Ya. Slepyan ◽  
Sergey A. Maksimenko
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Nanotubes ◽  
Thermal Radiation ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Field Effects

Analysis of nanopatterning through near field effects with femtosecond and nanosecond lasers on semiconducting and metallic targets

2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (7) ◽  
pp. 074305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay M. Sundaram ◽  
Alok Soni ◽  
Richard E. Russo ◽  
Sy-Bor Wen
Keyword(s):  
Near Field ◽  
Field Effects ◽  
Nanosecond Lasers

scholarly journals Coupling Methodology for Studying the Far Field Effects of Wave Energy Converter Arrays over a Varying Bathymetry

Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gael Verao Fernandez ◽  
Philip Balitsky ◽  
Vasiliki Stratigaki ◽  
Peter Troch
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulations ◽  
Wave Energy ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Propagation Model ◽  
Irregular Waves ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Field Effects ◽  
Numerical Tool

For renewable wave energy to operate at grid scale, large arrays of Wave Energy Converters (WECs) need to be deployed in the ocean. Due to the hydrodynamic interactions between the individual WECs of an array, the overall power absorption and surrounding wave field will be affected, both close to the WECs (near field effects) and at large distances from their location (far field effects). Therefore, it is essential to model both the near field and far field effects of WEC arrays. It is difficult, however, to model both effects using a single numerical model that offers the desired accuracy at a reasonable computational time. The objective of this paper is to present a generic coupling methodology that will allow to model both effects accurately. The presented coupling methodology is exemplified using the mild slope wave propagation model MILDwave and the Boundary Elements Methods (BEM) solver NEMOH. NEMOH is used to model the near field effects while MILDwave is used to model the WEC array far field effects. The information between the two models is transferred using a one-way coupling. The results of the NEMOH-MILDwave coupled model are compared to the results from using only NEMOH for various test cases in uniform water depth. Additionally, the NEMOH-MILDwave coupled model is validated against available experimental wave data for a 9-WEC array. The coupling methodology proves to be a reliable numerical tool as the results demonstrate a difference between the numerical simulations results smaller than 5% and between the numerical simulations results and the experimental data ranging from 3% to 11%. The simulations are subsequently extended for a varying bathymetry, which will affect the far field effects. As a result, our coupled model proves to be a suitable numerical tool for simulating far field effects of WEC arrays for regular and irregular waves over a varying bathymetry.

Non-Surface Polaritonic Peaks in Near-Field Radiative Transfer

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Braden Czapla ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
Karthik Sasihithlu ◽  
Arvind Narayanaswamy
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Radiative Transfer ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Surface Polaritons ◽  
Field Effects ◽  
Polar Materials ◽  
Electro Magnetic ◽  
Collective Influence ◽  
Magnetic Waves

Near-field effects in radiative transfer refer to the collective influence of interference, diffraction, and tunneling of electro-magnetic waves on energy transfer between two or more objects. Most studies of near-field radiative transfer have so far focused on the enhancement due to tunneling of surface polaritons. In this work, we show the existence of sharp peaks in the radiative transfer spectrum between two spheres of polar materials that are not due to surface polaritons. The peaks, which are present on either side of the restrahlen band, are because of Mie resonances.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document