Intensive optical field improves the photopolymerization-induced alignment quality of liquid crystals

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Sun ◽  
Shumei Wang
2021 ◽  
Vol 2056 (1) ◽  
pp. 012044
Author(s):  
T P Tkachenko ◽  
A A Zhukov ◽  
E P Pozhidaev

Abstract The paper considers the possibility of controlling the alignment quality of helical nanostructures of ferroelectric liquid crystals (FLCs) within the concept of biaxial surface potential due to variation the FLCs helical pitch p0 and polymer aligning layers structures.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 021701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Guo ◽  
Abhishek K. Srivastava ◽  
Evgeny P. Pozhidaev ◽  
Vladimir G. Chigrinov ◽  
Hoi-Sing Kwok

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. e27872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Nan Lin ◽  
Cédric Notredame ◽  
Jia-Ming Chang ◽  
Ting-Yi Sung ◽  
Wen-Lian Hsu

Author(s):  
Jennifer Sampson ◽  
John Krogstie ◽  
Csaba Veres

Recently semantic web technologies, such as ontologies, have been proposed as key enablers for integrating heterogeneous data schemas in business and governmental systems. Algorithms designed to align different but related ontologies have become necessary as differing ontologies proliferate. The process of ontology alignment seeks to find corresponding entities in a second ontology with the same or the closest meaning for each entity in a single ontology. This research is motivated by the need to provide tools and techniques to support the task of validating ontology alignment statements, since it cannot be guaranteed that the results from automated tools are accurate. The authors present a framework for understanding ontology alignment quality and describe how AlViz, a tool for visual ontology alignment, may be used to improve the quality of alignment results. An experiment was undertaken to test the claim that AlViz supports the task of validating ontology alignments. A promising result found that the tool has potential for identifying missing alignments and for rejecting false alignments.


Author(s):  
Jennifer Sampson ◽  
John Krogstie ◽  
Csaba Veres

Recently semantic web technologies, such as ontologies, have been proposed as key enablers for integrating heterogeneous data schemas in business and governmental systems. Algorithms designed to align different but related ontologies have become necessary as differing ontologies proliferate. The process of ontology alignment seeks to find corresponding entities in a second ontology with the same or the closest meaning for each entity in a single ontology. This research is motivated by the need to provide tools and techniques to support the task of validating ontology alignment statements, since it cannot be guaranteed that the results from automated tools are accurate. The authors present a framework for understanding ontology alignment quality and describe how AlViz, a tool for visual ontology alignment, may be used to improve the quality of alignment results. An experiment was undertaken to test the claim that AlViz supports the task of validating ontology alignments. A promising result found that the tool has potential for identifying missing alignments and for rejecting false alignments.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Gavrylyak ◽  
P. P. Maksimyak ◽  
O. S. Kshevetsky

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dent Earl ◽  
Ngan K Nguyen ◽  
Glenn Hickey ◽  
Robert S. Harris ◽  
Stephen Fitzgerald ◽  
...  

Background: Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) are a prerequisite for a wide variety of evolutionary analyses. Published assessments and benchmark datasets for protein and, to a lesser extent, global nucleotide MSAs are available, but less effort has been made to establish benchmarks in the more general problem of whole genome alignment (WGA). Results: Using the same model as the successful Assemblathon competitions, we organized a competitive evaluation in which teams submitted their alignments, and assessments were performed collectively after all the submissions were received. Three datasets were used: two of simulated primate and mammalian phylogenies, and one of 20 real fly genomes. In total 35 submissions were assessed, submitted by ten teams using 12 different alignment pipelines. Conclusions: We found agreement between independent simulation-based and statistical assessments, indicating that there are substantial accuracy differences between contemporary alignment tools. We saw considerable difference in the alignment quality of differently annotated regions, and found few tools aligned the duplications analysed. We found many tools worked well at shorter evolutionary distances, but fewer performed competitively at longer distances. We provide all datasets, submissions and assessment programs for further study, and provide, as a resource for future benchmarking, a convenient repository of code and data for reproducing the simulation assessments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document