Monofrequency control of low-frequency quartz resonators by holographic interferometry

The lateral line organs of the sea eel consist of canal and pit organs which are different in function. The former is a low frequency vibration detector whereas the latter functions as an ion receptor as well as a mechano receptor.The fine structure of the sensory epithelia of both organs were studied by means of ordinary transmission electron microscope, high voltage electron microscope and of surface scanning electron microscope.The sensory cells of the canal organ are polarized in front-caudal direction and those of the pit organ are polarized in dorso-ventral direction. The sensory epithelia of both organs have thinner surface coats compared to the surrounding ordinary epithelial cells, which have very thick fuzzy coatings on the apical surface.

Download Full-text

Lectin Binding to Human Breast Tumor Cells

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100090154 ◽

1976 ◽

Vol 34 ◽

pp. 34-35

Author(s):

Robert E. Nordquist ◽

J. Hill Anglin ◽

Michael P. Lerner

Keyword(s):

Carcinoma Cell ◽

Ricinus Communis ◽

Lectin Binding ◽

Low Frequency ◽

Breast Carcinoma Cell Line ◽

Human Breast ◽

Human Breast Tumor ◽

Duct Carcinoma ◽

Specific Antigens ◽

Ricin Agglutinin

A human breast carcinoma cell line (BOT-2) was derived from an infiltrating duct carcinoma (1). These cells were shown to have antigens that selectively bound antibodies from breast cancer patient sera (2). Furthermore, these tumor specific antigens could be removed from the living cells by low frequency sonication and have been partially characterized (3). These proteins have been shown to be around 100,000 MW and contain approximately 6% hexose and hexosamines. However, only the hexosamines appear to be available for lectin binding. This study was designed to use Concanavalin A (Con A) and Ricinus Communis (Ricin) agglutinin for the topagraphical localization of D-mannopyranosyl or glucopyranosyl and D-galactopyranosyl or DN- acetyl glactopyranosyl configurations on BOT-2 cell surfaces.

Download Full-text

Practical High Resolution Microscopy

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100101256 ◽

1968 ◽

Vol 26 ◽

pp. 302-303

Author(s):

P. A. Marsh ◽

T. Mullens ◽

D. Price

Keyword(s):

High Resolution ◽

Magnetic Fields ◽

Low Frequency ◽

Resolving Power ◽

Careful Attention ◽

Electron Microscopes ◽

The Relationship ◽

High Resolution Microscopy ◽

New Facilities

It is possible to exceed the guaranteed resolution on most electron microscopes by careful attention to microscope parameters essential for high resolution work. While our experience is related to a Philips EM-200, we hope that some of these comments will apply to all electron microscopes.The first considerations are vibration and magnetic fields. These are usually measured at the pre-installation survey and must be within specifications. It has been our experience, however, that these factors can be greatly influenced by the new facilities and therefore must be rechecked after the installation is completed. The relationship between the resolving power of an EM-200 and the maximum tolerable low frequency interference fields in milli-Oerstedt is 10 Å - 1.9, 8 Å - 1.4, 6 Å - 0.8.

Download Full-text