Perceptual linearization as display standard: link between psychophysics and contrast discrimination models

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Najoua Belaid ◽  
Ineke M. C. J. van Overveld ◽  
Jean-Bernard Martens
2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Abbonizio ◽  
Colin Clifford ◽  
Keith Langley

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2834-2849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Hara ◽  
Justin L. Gardner

Prior information about the relevance of spatial locations can vary in specificity; a single location, a subset of locations, or all locations may be of potential importance. Using a contrast-discrimination task with four possible targets, we asked whether performance benefits are graded with the spatial specificity of a prior cue and whether we could quantitatively account for behavioral performance with cortical activity changes measured by blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) imaging. Thus we changed the prior probability that each location contained the target from 100 to 50 to 25% by cueing in advance 1, 2, or 4 of the possible locations. We found that behavioral performance (discrimination thresholds) improved in a graded fashion with spatial specificity. However, concurrently measured cortical responses from retinotopically defined visual areas were not strictly graded; response magnitude decreased when all 4 locations were cued (25% prior probability) relative to the 100 and 50% prior probability conditions, but no significant difference in response magnitude was found between the 100 and 50% prior probability conditions for either cued or uncued locations. Also, although cueing locations increased responses relative to noncueing, this cue sensitivity was not graded with prior probability. Furthermore, contrast sensitivity of cortical responses, which could improve contrast discrimination performance, was not graded. Instead, an efficient-selection model showed that even if sensory responses do not strictly scale with prior probability, selection of sensory responses by weighting larger responses more can result in graded behavioral performance benefits with increasing spatial specificity of prior information.


Perception ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Bodis-Wollner ◽  
C D Hendley ◽  
J J Kulikowski

Contrast-modulated grating patterns were used to compare evoked responses and psychophysical thresholds of contrast modulation. The stimulus consisted of the successive presentation of a grating pattern at a higher and lower contrast. At a modulation rate of 8 Hz it was found that there is correspondence between the two kinds of data for a 6 cycle/degree grating. The just noticeable difference was not constant, and data approximated a Weber's law of contrast discrimination. However, it was found that there is a slight departure from this law, in that the ratio decreases with mean contrast. Both psychophysical and electrophysiological data exclude a model of simple luminance detection and are consistent with the operation of spatial contrast detectors in the human visual system.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 161-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Yu ◽  
S. A Klein ◽  
D. M Levi

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 345-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L Varadharajan ◽  
J. M Foley

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Goto ◽  
Yuya Hataji

Automated touchscreen-based tasks are increasingly being used to explore a broad range of issues in learning and behavior in mice. Researchers usually report how they train mice before acquiring the target task concisely, and shaping protocols at this stage are typically flexible. In this report, we described a training protocol, developed in our laboratory, for mice acquiring a simultaneous discrimination performance using visual stimuli. C57BL/6N mice were first given magazine training. Nosepoke responses were then authoshaped and maintained on a continuous reinforcement schedule. Self-start response was then introduced in order to measure response time to complete each trial. The stimulus position was also varied across trials. We finally examined the contrast discrimination performance. Mice were tested with four different contrast ratios. Target stimuli were white and black targets and the brightness of distractors had values between targets and background. All mice successfully went through all training stages, confirming that this training protocol is promising for shaping appropriate discriminative behaviors in mice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document