Optimizing deep learning classifier performance for low to medium resolution overhead imagery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Dalrymple ◽  
Matthew D. Reisman ◽  
Adam Francisco ◽  
Garrett Zans ◽  
Taber Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Learning Classifier ◽  
Medium Resolution ◽  
Classifier Performance

scholarly journals Deep-learning-based high-resolution recognition of fractional-spatial-mode-encoded data for free-space optical communications

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Youngbin Na ◽  
Do-Kyeong Ko
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Communication Systems ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Image Transmission ◽  
Data Traffic ◽  
Free Space Optical ◽  
Learning Classifier ◽  
Communication Capacity ◽  
Data Rates ◽  
Mode Space

AbstractStructured light with spatial degrees of freedom (DoF) is considered a potential solution to address the unprecedented demand for data traffic, but there is a limit to effectively improving the communication capacity by its integer quantization. We propose a data transmission system using fractional mode encoding and deep-learning decoding. Spatial modes of Bessel-Gaussian beams separated by fractional intervals are employed to represent 8-bit symbols. Data encoded by switching phase holograms is efficiently decoded by a deep-learning classifier that only requires the intensity profile of transmitted modes. Our results show that the trained model can simultaneously recognize two independent DoF without any mode sorter and precisely detect small differences between fractional modes. Moreover, the proposed scheme successfully achieves image transmission despite its densely packed mode space. This research will present a new approach to realizing higher data rates for advanced optical communication systems.

scholarly journals A deep learning classifier for digital breast tomosynthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 184-193
Author(s):  
R. Ricciardi ◽  
G. Mettivier ◽  
M. Staffa ◽  
A. Sarno ◽  
G. Acampora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Learning Classifier

scholarly journals Machine learning applied on chest x-ray can aid in the diagnosis of COVID-19: a first experience from Lombardy, Italy

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Castiglioni ◽  
Davide Ippolito ◽  
Matteo Interlenghi ◽  
Caterina Beatrice Monti ◽  
Christian Salvatore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Independent Dataset ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Learning Classifier ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Deep Learning Model

Abstract Background We aimed to train and test a deep learning classifier to support the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using chest x-ray (CXR) on a cohort of subjects from two hospitals in Lombardy, Italy. Methods We used for training and validation an ensemble of ten convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with mainly bedside CXRs of 250 COVID-19 and 250 non-COVID-19 subjects from two hospitals (Centres 1 and 2). We then tested such system on bedside CXRs of an independent group of 110 patients (74 COVID-19, 36 non-COVID-19) from one of the two hospitals. A retrospective reading was performed by two radiologists in the absence of any clinical information, with the aim to differentiate COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 patients. Real-time polymerase chain reaction served as the reference standard. Results At 10-fold cross-validation, our deep learning model classified COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients with 0.78 sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–0.81), 0.82 specificity (95% CI 0.78–0.85), and 0.89 area under the curve (AUC) (95% CI 0.86–0.91). For the independent dataset, deep learning showed 0.80 sensitivity (95% CI 0.72–0.86) (59/74), 0.81 specificity (29/36) (95% CI 0.73–0.87), and 0.81 AUC (95% CI 0.73–0.87). Radiologists’ reading obtained 0.63 sensitivity (95% CI 0.52–0.74) and 0.78 specificity (95% CI 0.61–0.90) in Centre 1 and 0.64 sensitivity (95% CI 0.52–0.74) and 0.86 specificity (95% CI 0.71–0.95) in Centre 2. Conclusions This preliminary experience based on ten CNNs trained on a limited training dataset shows an interesting potential of deep learning for COVID-19 diagnosis. Such tool is in training with new CXRs to further increase its performance.

scholarly journals 574 A deep learning classifier for the analysis of tiger tail banding in trichothiodystrophy

2021 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. S100
Author(s):  
A. Ho ◽  
E.H. Rizza ◽  
J. Jeskey ◽  
S. Folarin ◽  
D. Tamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Learning Classifier

Fr619 DEEP LEARNING CLASSIFIER TO DETECT INFLAMED AND NON-INFLAMED AREAS WITHIN WHOLE MOUSE COLONS.

2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-379
Author(s):  
Soma Kobayashi ◽  
Jason Shieh ◽  
Ainara Ruiz de Sabando ◽  
Agnieszka B. Bialkowska ◽  
Joel H. Saltz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Learning Classifier

scholarly journals Deep Semi-Supervised Learning Improves Universal Peptide Identification of Shotgun Proteomics Data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Halloran ◽  
Gregor Urban ◽  
David Rocke ◽  
Pierre Baldi
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Peptide Identification ◽  
Shotgun Proteomics ◽  
Database Search ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Proteomics Data ◽  
Learning Classifier

AbstractSemi-supervised machine learning post-processors critically improve peptide identification of shot-gun proteomics data. Such post-processors accept the peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) and feature vectors resulting from a database search, train a machine learning classifier, and recalibrate PSMs using the trained parameters, often yielding significantly more identified peptides across q-value thresholds. However, current state-of-the-art post-processors rely on shallow machine learning methods, such as support vector machines. In contrast, the powerful training capabilities of deep learning models have displayed superior performance to shallow models in an ever-growing number of other fields. In this work, we show that deep models significantly improve the recalibration of PSMs compared to the most accurate and widely-used post-processors, such as Percolator and PeptideProphet. Furthermore, we show that deep learning is able to adaptively analyze complex datasets and features for more accurate universal post-processing, leading to both improved Prosit analysis and markedly better recalibration of recently developed database-search functions.

scholarly journals SKIN LESION CLASSIFICATION FROM DERMOSCOPY AND CLINICAL IMAGES WITH A DEEP LEARNING APPROACH

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1294-1300
Author(s):  
Aigli Korfiati ◽  
◽  
Giorgos Livanos ◽  
Christos Konstandinou ◽  
Sophia Georgiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Medical Image ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Early Screening ◽  
Clinical Images ◽  
Cad Systems ◽  
Learning Classifier ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems based on deep learning approaches are now feasible due to the availability of big data and the availability of powerful computational resources.The medical image-based CAD systems are of great interest in numerous diseases, but especially for skin cancer diagnosis, deep learning models have been mostly developed for dermoscopy images. Models for clinical images are few, mainly due to the unavailability of big volumes of relevant data. However, CAD systems able to classify skin lesions from clinical images would be of great valueboth for the population and clinicians as an initial early screening of lesions that would leadpatients to visiting a dermatologist in case of suspicious lesions. This is even more pronounced in areas where there is lack of dermoscopy instruments. Thus, in this paper, we aimed to build a classifier based on bothdermoscopy and clinical images able to discriminate skin cancer from skin lesions. The classification is made among three benign and two malignant categories, which include Nevus, Benign but not nevus, Benign but suspicious for malignancy, Melanoma and Non-Melanocytic Carcinoma.The proposed deep learning classifier achieves an Area Under Curve ranging between 0.75 and 0.9 for the five examined categories.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document