Theoretical performance of polycrystalline mercuric iodide X-ray converters incorporating pillar-supported frisch grid structures

Author(s):  
Liuxing Shen ◽  
Albert K. Liang ◽  
Youcef El-Mohri ◽  
Qihua Zhao ◽  
Larry E. Antonuk
1993 ◽  
Vol 302 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. James ◽  
X. J. Bao ◽  
T. E. Schlesinger ◽  
A. Y. Cheng ◽  
V. M. Gerrish

ABSTRACTThe processing steps associated with purification of source material, crystal growth, and attachment of electrical contacts can introduce defects into mercuric iodide (HgI2) that degrade the performance of detectors. We have employed low-temperature photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy to study radiative recombination centers in the interfacial region between a thin semitransparent film of silver and mercuric iodide. The Ag film was found to introduce a new broad emission band centered at 5490 Å in the photoluminescence spectrum of HgI2. This PL feature can be used as a signature to identify the existence of Ag as a contaminant in HgI2 crystals and detectors. Experiments were also conducted on mercuric iodide surfaces that had been doped with silver, and the results showed that Ag is a rapid diffuser in bulk HgI2. Detectors with silver electrodes were also fabricated and tested using an americium-241 gamma-ray source. Large increases in the leakage currents were observed for the Ag-doped HgI2 devices, indicated that Ag impurities are electrically active in HgI2. These measurements show that silver is unacceptable as an electrode material for mercuric iodide x-ray and gamma-ray detector applications. In addition, they reveal that caution must be taken during handling of mercuric iodide source material, crystals, and detectors to avoid contact with silver, silver compounds, or with any material that contains silver as a contaminant.


1980 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 752-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel P. Faile ◽  
Andrzej J. Dabrowski ◽  
Gerald C. Huth ◽  
Jan S. Iwanczyk

1982 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Howes ◽  
John Watling

ABSTRACTThis paper describes the fabrication of mercuric iodide nuclear radiation detectors suitable for X and gamma ray spectrometry at room temperature. The active area of the detectors studied are between 0.2 and 1.5cm sq and they are up to 0.5mm thick. The method of producing a stable electrical contact to the crystal using sputtered germanium has been studied. The X-ray resolution of a 1.5cm sq. area detector at 32 keV is 2.3 keV FWHM when operated at room temperature in conjunction with a time variant filter amplifier. A factor which is important in the fabrication of the detector is the surface passivation necessary to achieve a useful detector life.This type of detector has been used on a wavelength dispersive X-ray spectrometer for energy measurements between 10 and 100 keV. The advantages over the scintillation counter, more commonly used, is the improved resolution of the HgI2 detector and its smaller size. The analyser is primarily used for the detection of low levels of heavy metals on particulate filters. The detectors have also been used on an experimental basis for gamma ray backscatter measurements in the medical field.


Author(s):  
Byung-Youl Cha ◽  
Ji-Koon Park ◽  
Sang-Sik Kang ◽  
Jung-Wook Shin ◽  
Jin-Young Kim ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 275 (1-2) ◽  
pp. e1327-e1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Zentai ◽  
M. Schieber ◽  
L. Partain ◽  
R. Pavlyuchkova ◽  
C. Proano

1994 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 615-624
Author(s):  
Bradley E. Patt ◽  
Jan S. Iwanczyk ◽  
Martin P. Tornai ◽  
Craig S. Levin ◽  
Edward J. Hoffman

Abstract A nineteen element mercuric iodide (HgI2) detector array has been developed in order to investigate the potential of using this technology for in-vivo x-ray and gamma-ray imaging. A prototype cross-grid detector array was constructed with hexagonal pixels of 1.9 mm diameter (active area = 3.28 mm2) and 0.2 mm thick septa. The overall detector active area is roughly 65 mm2. A detector thickness of 1.2 mm was used to achieve about 100% efficiency at 60 keV and 67% efficiency at 140 keV The detector fabrication, geometry and structure were optimized for charge collection and to minimize crosstalk between elements. A section of a standard high resolution cast-lead gamma-camera collimator was incorporated into the detector to provide collimation matching the discrete pixel geometry. Measurements of spectral and spatial performance of the array were made using 241-Am and 99m-Tc sources. These measurements were compared with similar measurements made using an optimized single HgI2 x-ray detector with active area of about 3 mm2 and thickness of 500 μm.


1981 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. N. Conde ◽  
L. F. Requicha Ferreira ◽  
A. J. de Campos

AbstractA review of the basic physical principles of the gas proportional scintillation counter is presented. Its performance is discussed and compared with that of other room-temperature detectors in regard to applications to portable instruments for energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis. It is concluded that the gas proportional scintillation counter is definitely superior to all other room-temperature detectors, except the mercuric iodide (HgI2) detector. For large areas or soft X-rays it is also superior to the HgI2 detector.


1983 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 307-316
Author(s):  
J. Nissenbaum ◽  
A. Levi ◽  
A. Burger ◽  
M. Schieber ◽  
Z. Burshtein

AbstractWe have explored the merits of using a Hgl2 spectrometer as a detector in x-ray diffraction systems instead of a proportional gas counter, or a scintillation counter. The full width at half maximum energy resolution of the HgI2 spectrometer used was about 1.1 keV for the CuKα line (8.1 keV), and about 1.5 keV for the MoKα line (17.4 keV), The energy resolution was utilised to eliminate x-ray fluorescence background from powder diffraction spectra. We demonstrate the suppression of Fe x-ray fluorescence in diffraction patterns of ErFe03 obtained with a Cu x-ray tube, and of Y x-ray fluorescence in diffraction patterns of Y2O3 obtained with a Mo x-ray tube. The peak height to background ratios were improved by about an order of magnitude in both cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document