Enabling continuity of the earth radiation budget climate data record using the Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Flight Model 5 on S-NPP

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohan Shankar ◽  
Kory J. Priestley ◽  
Natividad M. Smith ◽  
Susan Thomas ◽  
Dale R. Walikainen
Keyword(s):  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Data Record ◽  
Earth Radiation Budget ◽  
Climate Data Record ◽  
Flight Model ◽  
Earth Radiation

scholarly journals Generation of a Seamless Earth Radiation Budget Climate Data Record: A New Methodology for Placing Overlapping Satellite Instruments on the Same Radiometric Scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 2787
Author(s):  
Mohan Shankar ◽  
Wenying Su ◽  
Natividad Manalo-Smith ◽  
Norman G. Loeb
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Response ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Data Record ◽  
Earth Radiation Budget ◽  
Climate Data Record ◽  
Earth Radiation

The Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) instruments have enabled the generation of a multi-decadal Earth radiation budget (ERB) climate data record (CDR) at the top of the Earth’s atmosphere, within the atmosphere, and at the Earth’s surface. Six CERES instruments have been launched over the course of twenty years, starting in 1999. To seamlessly continue the data record into the future, there is a need to radiometrically scale observations from newly launched instruments to observations from the existing data record. In this work, we describe a methodology to place the CERES Flight Model (FM) 5 instrument on the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (SNPP) spacecraft on the same radiometric scale as the FM3 instrument on the Aqua spacecraft. We determine the required magnitude of radiometric scaling by using spatially and temporally matched observations from these two instruments and describe the process to radiometrically scale SNPP/FM5 to Aqua/FM3 through the instrument spectral response functions. We also present validation results after application of this radiometric scaling and demonstrate the long-term consistency of the SNPP/FM5 record in comparison with the CERES instruments on Aqua and Terra.

Libera and Continuity of the Earth Radiation Budget Climate Data Record

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Pilewskie ◽  
Maria Hakuba ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Development ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Radiative Energy ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Data Record ◽  
Earth Radiation Budget ◽  
Climate Data Record ◽  
Earth Radiation

<p>The NASA Libera Mission, named for the daughter of Ceres in Roman mythology, will provide continuity of the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Earth radiation budget (ERB) observations from space. Libera’s  attributes enable a seamless extension of the ERB climate data record. Libera will acquire integrated radiance over the CERES FM6-heritage broad spectral bands in the shortwave (0.3 to 5 μm), longwave (5 to 50 μm) and total (0.3 to beyond 100 μm) and adds a split-shortwave band (0.7 to 5 μm) to provide deeper insight into shortwave energy deposition. Libera leverages advanced detector technologies using vertically aligned black-carbon nanotubes with closed-loop electrical substitution radiometry to achieve radiometric uncertainty of approximately 0.2%. Libera will also employ a wide field-of-view camera to provide scene context and explore pathways for separating future ERB missions from complex imagers.</p><p>The Libera science objectives associated with continuity and extension of the ERB data record are to identify and quantify processes responsible for ERB variability on various time scales. Beyond data continuity, Libera’s new and enhanced observational capabilities will advance our understanding of spatiotemporal variations of radiative energy flow in the visible and and near-infrared spectral regions. They will also enable the rapid development of angular distribution models to facilitate near-IR and visible radiance-to-irradiance conversion.</p>

scholarly journals Decadal Changes of Earth’s Outgoing Longwave Radiation

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Dewitte ◽  
Nicolas Clerbaux
Keyword(s):  
Outgoing Longwave Radiation ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Longwave Radiation ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Regional Patterns ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Earth Radiation Budget ◽  
Earth Radiation

The Earth Radiation Budget (ERB) at the top of the atmosphere quantifies how the earth gains energy from the sun and loses energy to space. Its monitoring is of fundamental importance for understanding ongoing climate change. In this paper, decadal changes of the Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR) as measured by the Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System from 2000 to 2018, the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment from 1985 to 1998, and the High-resolution Infrared Radiation Sounder from 1985 to 2018 are analysed. The OLR has been rising since 1985, and correlates well with the rising global temperature. An observational estimate of the derivative of the OLR with respect to temperature of 2.93 +/− 0.3 W/m 2 K is obtained. The regional patterns of the observed OLR change from 1985–2000 to 2001–2017 show a warming pattern in the Northern Hemisphere in particular in the Arctic, as well as tropical cloudiness changes related to a strengthening of La Niña.

scholarly journals Global Daytime Mean Shortwave Flux Consistency Under Varying EPIC Viewing Geometries

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenying Su ◽  
Lusheng Liang ◽  
David P. Duda ◽  
Konstantin Khlopenkov ◽  
Mandana M. Thieman
Keyword(s):  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Field Of View ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Imaging Camera ◽  
Earth Radiation Budget ◽  
Mean Square Errors ◽  
Earth Radiation

One of the most crucial tasks of measuring top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative flux is to understand the relationships between radiances and fluxes, particularly for the reflected shortwave (SW) fluxes. The radiance-to-flux conversion is accomplished by constructing angular distribution models (ADMs). This conversion depends on solar-viewing geometries as well as the scene types within the field of view. To date, the most comprehensive observation-based ADMs are developed using the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) observations. These ADMs are used to derive TOA SW fluxes from CERES and other Earth radiation budget instruments which observe the Earth mostly from side-scattering angles. The Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) onboard Deep Space Climate Observatory observes the Earth at the Lagrange-1 point in the near-backscattering directions and offers a testbed for the CERES ADMs. As the EPIC relative azimuth angles change from 168◦ to 178◦, the global daytime mean SW radiances can increase by as much as 10% though no notable cloud changes are observed. The global daytime mean SW fluxes derived after considering the radiance anisotropies at relative azimuth angles of 168◦ and 178◦ show much smaller differences (<1%), indicating increases in EPIC SW radiances are due mostly to changes in viewing geometries. Furthermore, annual global daytime mean SW fluxes from EPIC agree with the CERES equivalents to within 0.5 Wm−2 with root-mean-square errors less than 3.0 Wm−2. Consistency between SW fluxes from EPIC and CERES inverted from very different viewing geometries indicates that the CERES ADMs accurately quantify the radiance anisotropy and can be used for flux inversion from different viewing perspectives.

scholarly journals CERES Top-of-Atmosphere Earth Radiation Budget Climate Data Record: Accounting for in-Orbit Changes in Instrument Calibration

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Loeb ◽  
Natividad Manalo-Smith ◽  
Wenying Su ◽  
Mohan Shankar ◽  
Susan Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Instrument Calibration ◽  
Data Record ◽  
Earth Radiation Budget ◽  
Climate Data Record ◽  
Earth Radiation

Generation of a multi-decadal Earth Radiation Budget Thematic Climate Data Record : Balancing accuracy, precision, and availability to meet the needs of the community

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kory Priestley ◽  
Mohan Shankar ◽  
Susan Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Temporal Scales ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Scales ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
Data Record ◽  
Earth Radiation Budget ◽  
Climate Data Record ◽  
Earth Radiation

<p>NASA’s Earth Radiation Budget Science Team, ERB-ST, (Previously known as the CERES Science Team) is a multi-disciplinary team led out of NASA’s Langley Research Center which has the responsibility for governance of the nation’s multi-decadal Earth Radiation Budget Climate Data Record, ERB CDR.  The Science Data Processing System which produces the ERB-CDR is highly complex, producing Level one through Level 4 products.  The system ingests data from 15 different instruments on 9 different spacecraft (5 GEO and 4 LEO) as well as other ancillary information, producing 25 different products with consistent TOA, Surface, and atmospheric radiative fluxes, cloud and aerosol properties on multiple spatial and temporal scales.  Spatial scales vary from instantaneous/pixel (25 km), 1-deg grid, zonal, regional and global means while temporal scales vary across instantaneous, hourly, 3 hourly to monthly scales.  Accuracy and precision values vary across the various spatial and temporal scales, with the long-term goal of measuring decadal trends of better than 0.3 W/m^2 per decade.</p><p> </p><p>Instrument calibration and precision, as measured through the post-launch protocols, is one of many considerations that drive the decision to reprocess, others include, but are not limited to validation and instantiation of new algorithms across all levels of products, outside teams reprocessing the products we ingest, the launch of new instrumentation to replace operational weather imagers on Geo satellites, updates to processing hardware, and of course resource availability.  These all need to be managed/considered in order to provide the global community products of sufficient accuracy and precision on a time-scale which allows continued advancement and discovery of key scientific questions such that policy makers may make informed decisions.</p><p> </p><p>This presentation will highlight the processes and protocols the Earth Radiation Budget Science Team utilizes to guide reprocessing decisions, identifying lessons learned and best practices.</p>

Unfiltering of the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) Data. Part II: Longwave Radiation

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1106-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Clerbaux ◽  
S. Dewitte ◽  
C. Bertrand ◽  
D. Caprion ◽  
B. De Paepe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Longwave Radiation ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Spectral Radiance ◽  
Infrared Imager ◽  
Earth Radiation Budget ◽  
Different Sources ◽  
Flight Model ◽  
Earth Radiation

Abstract The method used to estimate the unfiltered longwave broadband radiance from the filtered radiances measured by the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) instrument is presented. This unfiltering method is used to generate the first released edition of the GERB-2 dataset. This method involves a set of regressions between the unfiltering factor (i.e., the ratio of the unfiltered and filtered broadband radiances) and the narrowband observations of the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) instrument. The regressions are theoretically derived from a large database of simulated spectral radiance curves obtained by radiative transfer computations. The generation of this database is fully described. Different sources of error that may affect the GERB unfiltering have been identified and the associated error magnitudes are assessed on the database. For most of the earth–atmosphere conditions, the error introduced during the unfiltering processes is well under 0.5% (RMS error of about 0.1%). For more confidence, the unfiltered radiances of GERB-2 are validated by cross comparison with collocated and coangular Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) observations. The agreement between the unfiltered radiances is within the science goals (1% accuracy for GERB and 0.5% for CERES) for the Flight Model 2 (FM2). For the CERES Flight Model 3 (FM3) instrument, an overall difference of 1.8% is observed. The intercomparisons indicate some scene-type dependency, which is due to the unfiltering for the cloudy scenes. This should be corrected for subsequent editions of the database.

scholarly journals Radiometric Performance of the CERES Earth Radiation Budget Climate Record Sensors on the EOS Aqua and Terra Spacecraft through April 2007

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kory J. Priestley ◽  
G. Louis Smith ◽  
Susan Thomas ◽  
Denise Cooper ◽  
Robert B. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Calibration Data ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Science Data ◽  
Data Products ◽  
Earth Radiation Budget ◽  
Accuracy And Stability ◽  
Earth Radiation

Abstract The Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) flight models 1 through 4 instruments were launched aboard NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS) Terra and Aqua spacecraft into 705-km sun-synchronous orbits with 10:30 p.m. and 1:30 a.m. local time equatorial crossing times. With these instruments CERES provides state-of-the-art observations and products related to the earth’s radiation budget at the top of the atmosphere (TOA). The archived CERES science data products consist of geolocated and calibrated instantaneous filtered and unfiltered radiances through temporally and spatially averaged TOA, surface, and atmospheric fluxes. CERES-filtered radiance measurements cover three spectral bands: shortwave (0.3–5 μm), total (0.3>100 μm), and an atmospheric window channel (8–12 μm). CERES climate data products realize a factor of 2–4 improvement in calibration accuracy and stability over the previotus Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) products. To achieve this improvement there are three editions of data products. Edition 1 generates data products using gain coefficients derived from ground calibrations. After a minimum of four months, the calibration data are examined to remove drifts in the calibration. The data are then reprocessed to produce the edition 2 data products. These products are available for science investigations for which an accuracy of 2% is sufficient. Also, a validation protocol is applied to these products to find problems and develop solutions, after which edition 3 data products will be computed, for which the objectives are calibration stability of better than 0.2% and calibration traceability from ground to flight of 0.25%. This paper reports the status of the radiometric accuracy and stability of the CERES edition 2 instrument data products through April 2007.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document