A linear discriminative analysis based fall motion detector using radar

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fauzia Ahmad ◽  
Sivan Zlotnikov ◽  
Patrick Somaru ◽  
Panos P. Markopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Motion Detector ◽  
Discriminative Analysis

A Simple Transverse Motion Detector for Railguns

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Levinson ◽  
Stephan Bless
Keyword(s):  
Transverse Motion ◽  
Motion Detector

scholarly journals A Model for an Angular Velocity-Tuned Motion Detector Accounting for Deviations in the Corridor-Centering Response of the Bee

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. e1004887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex J. Cope ◽  
Chelsea Sabo ◽  
Kevin Gurney ◽  
Eleni Vasilaki ◽  
James A. R. Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Motion Detector

Discriminative analysis of early Alzheimer's disease using multi-modal imaging and multi-level characterization with multi-classifier (M3)

NeuroImage ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 2187-2195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengjia Dai ◽  
Chaogan Yan ◽  
Zhiqun Wang ◽  
Jinhui Wang ◽  
Mingrui Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Discriminative Analysis ◽  
Early Alzheimer’S Disease

scholarly journals Comprehensive Characterization of the Major Presynaptic Elements to the Drosophila OFF Motion Detector

Neuron ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 829-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne Serbe ◽  
Matthias Meier ◽  
Aljoscha Leonhardt ◽  
Alexander Borst
Keyword(s):  
Motion Detector ◽  
Comprehensive Characterization

Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. II. Critical cues for detecting approaching objects

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1667-1682 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Simmons ◽  
F. C. Rind
Keyword(s):  
Moving Objects ◽  
Optic Lobe ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Motion Detector ◽  
Dark Light ◽  
Subsequent Response ◽  
Object Movement ◽  
Line Movement ◽  
Important Stimulus

1. We examine the critical image cues that are used by the locust visual system for the descending contralateral motion detector (DCMD) neuron to distinguish approaching from receding objects. Images were controlled by computer and presented on an electrostatic monitor. 2. Changes in overall luminance elicited much smaller and briefer responses from the DCMD than objects that appeared to approach the eye. Although a decrease in overall luminance might boost the response to an approaching dark object, movement of edges of the image is more important. 3. When two pairs of lines, in a cross-hairs configuration, were moved apart and then together again, the DCMD showed no preference for divergence compared with convergence of edges. A directional response was obtained by either making the lines increase in extent during divergence and decrease in extent during convergence; or by continually increasing the velocity of line movement during divergence and decreasing velocity during convergence. 4. The DCMD consistently gave a larger response to growing than to shrinking solid rectangular images. An increase compared with a decrease in the extent of edge in an image is, therefore, an important cue for the directionality of the response. For single moving edges of fixed extent, the neuron gave the largest response to edges that subtended 15 degrees at the eye. 5. The DCMD was very sensitive to the amount by which an edge traveled between frames on the display screen, with the largest responses generated by 2.5 degrees of travel. This implies that the neurons in the optic lobe that drive this movement-detecting system have receptive fields of about the same extent as a single ommatidium. 6. For edges moving up to 250 degree/s, the excitation of the DCMD increases with velocity. The response to an edge moving at a constant velocity adapts rapidly, in a manner that depends on velocity. Movement over one part of the retina can adapt the subsequent response to movement over another part of the retina. 7. For the DCMD to track and continue to respond to the image of an approaching object, the edges of the image must continually increase in velocity. This is the second important stimulus cue. 8. Edges of opposite contrasts (light-dark compared with dark-light) are processed in separate pathways that inhibit each other. This would contribute to the reduction of responses to wide-field movements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document