Recording system upgrade for the Dante x-ray diagnostic on the National Ignition Facility

Author(s):  
Perry M. Bell ◽  
Todd J. Clancy ◽  
Bart V. Beeman ◽  
Alastair S. Moore ◽  
Benjamin Prat ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 063105 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. May ◽  
G. E. Kemp ◽  
J. D. Colvin ◽  
D. A. Liedahl ◽  
P. L. Poole ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 082701 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. B. Fournier ◽  
M. J. May ◽  
J. D. Colvin ◽  
J. O. Kane ◽  
M. Schneider ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.R. DITTRICH ◽  
S.W. HAAN ◽  
M.M. MARINAK ◽  
D.E. HINKEL ◽  
S.M. POLLAINE ◽  
...  

Several choices exist in the design and production of capsules intended to ignite and propagate fusion burn of the deuterium–tritium (D–T) fuel when imploded by indirect drive at the National Ignition Facility (NIF). These choices include ablator material, ablator dopant concentration and distribution, capsule dimensions, and X-ray drive profile (shock timings and strengths). The choice of ablator material must also include fabrication and material characteristics, such as attainable surface finishes, permeability, strength, transparency to radio frequency and infrared radiation, thermal conductivity, and material homogeneity. Understanding the advantages and/or limitations of these choices is an ongoing effort for LLNL and LANL designers. At this time, simulations in one-, two-, and three-dimensions show that capsules with either a copper-doped beryllium or a polyimide (C22H10N2O4) ablator material have both the least sensitivity to initial surface roughnesses and favorable fabrication qualities. Simulations also indicate the existence of capsule designs based on these ablator materials which ignite and burn when imploded by less than nominal laser performance (900-kJ energy, 250-TW power, producing 250-eV peak radiation temperature). We will describe and compare these reduced-scale capsules, in addition to several designs which use the expected 300-eV peak X-ray drive obtained from operating the NIF laser at 1.3 MJ and 500 TW.


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 10G121 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Huntington ◽  
J. M. McNaney ◽  
E. Gumbrell ◽  
A. Krygier ◽  
C. Wehrenberg ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (S2) ◽  
pp. 518-519
Author(s):  
Dale E. Newbury ◽  
David S. Bright

X-ray mapping is one of the most popular modes for displaying information obtained with x-ray spectrometry performed in the scanning electron microscope. This popularity arises from the ready accessibility and apparent simplicity of information presented in a pictorial fashion, especially when used in conjunction with other SEM imaging modes, such as backscattered, secondary, and specimen current electron images. Further, the rise of powerful, inexpensive computer systems capable of image processing and display has given the analyst a dedicated, on-line tool with the capacity and flexibility needed for problem solving. Figure 1 shows a typical example of mapping. Although the interpretation of x-ray images obtained with a modern digital control and recording system would seem to be straightforward and relatively trivial, there are significant pitfalls and limitations that can easily fool the unwary. In Figure 1, within an individual x-ray map, the observer can reasonably judge where the concentration is lower or higher, at least for a group of contiguous pixels. Can such judgments be made among a set of maps of the same region for different elements, or even for the same element from different regions of the same specimen? With current x-ray processing and display systems, the answers are generally no. In fact, problems that can influence interpretation can arise at each stage of x-ray generation/emission, x-ray spectral collection, processing, and display.


2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (11) ◽  
pp. 11D703 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Danly ◽  
K. Christensen ◽  
V. E. Fatherley ◽  
D. N. Fittinghoff ◽  
G. P. Grim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. P12009-P12009 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. MacDonald ◽  
B. Kozioziemski ◽  
A.G. MacPhee ◽  
M.B. Schneider ◽  
J. Ayers ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 056311 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. B. Meezan ◽  
A. J. MacKinnon ◽  
D. G. Hicks ◽  
E. L. Dewald ◽  
R. Tommasini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document