Design, optimization and evaluation of a “smart” pixel sensor array for low-dose digital radiography

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Wang ◽  
Xinghui Liu ◽  
Hai Ou ◽  
Jun Chen
2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110224
Author(s):  
Jeongha Mok ◽  
Jeong A Yeom ◽  
Su Won Nam ◽  
Jun Mi Yoo ◽  
Ji Won Lee ◽  
...  

Background Chest radiography value as a screening tool in those exposed to pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is reduced by its lower sensitivity to detect small intrapulmonary lesions. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of digital tomosynthesis (DTS) screening of individuals that had contacted persons with active TB using low-dose computed tomography (CT) as the reference standard methods. Material and Methods This retrospective, community-based screening study of 90 adults who had been in close contact with a TB case was undertaken at our institution. All individuals underwent clinical evaluation, digital radiography (DR), DTS, and low-dose chest CT. Observers assessed and classified DR and DTS images using CT as the reference-standard method. Based on clinical and imaging findings, TB status was classified as normal, latent, minimal, subclinical, and active. Diagnostic performances of DTS and DR for the interpretation of correct diagnosis were calculated. Results The estimated effective doses for DR, DTS, and low-dose CT were 0.01 mSv, 0.1 mSv, and 0.33 mSv, respectively. TB statuses of the 90 individuals were as follows: 62 latent (68.9%); two subclinical (2.2%); and one minimal (1.1%). The sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of DTS and DR in the interpretation of correct diagnosis were 75.8%, 100%, 91.1% and 48.5%, 96.5%, 78.9%, respectively. Conclusion DTS appears to be superior to DR for the detection of lung lesions in individuals with TB contacts. DTS can offer a reasonable option for TB contact investigation.


1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.A. van Blerkom ◽  
Chi Fan ◽  
M. Blume ◽  
S.C. Esener

2020 ◽  
Vol 215 (2) ◽  
pp. 488-493
Author(s):  
Gayoung Choi ◽  
Jung-Eun Cheon ◽  
Seunghyun Lee ◽  
Young Hun Choi ◽  
Seung Han Shin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Matteo Bettuzzi ◽  
Samantha Cornacchia ◽  
Massimo Rossi ◽  
Enrica Paltrinieri ◽  
Maria Pia Morigi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zlatan Alagic ◽  
Robert Bujila ◽  
Anders Enocson ◽  
Subhash Srivastava ◽  
Seppo K. Koskinen

Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to assess if ultra-low-dose CT is a useful clinical alternative to digital radiographs in the evaluation of acute wrist and ankle fractures. Materials and methods An ultra-low-dose protocol was designed on a 256-slice multi-detector CT. Patients from the emergency department were evaluated prospectively. After initial digital radiographs, an ultra-low-dose CT was performed. Two readers independently analyzed the images. Also, the radiation dose, examination time, and time to preliminary report was compared between digital radiographs and CT. Results In 207 extremities, digital radiography and ultra-low-dose CT detected 73 and 109 fractures, respectively (p < 0.001). The odds ratio for fracture detection with ultra-low-dose CT vs. digital radiography was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4–3.0). CT detected additional fracture-related findings in 33 cases (15.9%) and confirmed or ruled out suspected fractures in 19 cases (9.2%). The mean effective dose was comparable between ultra-low-dose CT and digital radiography (0.59 ± 0.33 μSv, 95% CI 0.47–0.59 vs. 0.53 ± 0.43 μSv, 95% CI 0.54–0.64). The mean combined examination time plus time to preliminary report was shorter for ultra-low-dose CT compared to digital radiography (7.6 ± 2.5 min, 95% CI 7.1–8.1 vs. 9.8 ± 4.7 min, 95% CI 8.8–10.7) (p = 0.002). The recommended treatment changed in 34 (16.4%) extremities. Conclusions Ultra-low-dose CT is a useful alternative to digital radiography for imaging the peripheral skeleton in the acute setting as it detects significantly more fractures and provides additional clinically important information, at a comparable radiation dose. It also provides faster combined examination and reporting times.


2010 ◽  
Vol 194 (5) ◽  
pp. W388-W395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt Szucs-Farkas ◽  
Irene Kaelin ◽  
Patricia M. Flach ◽  
Andrea Rosskopf ◽  
Thomas D. Ruder ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document