scholarly journals 3D face recognition algorithm of alignment and fitting (retraction notice)

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yifei Wu ◽  
Yao Cheng ◽  
Nan Yang
Author(s):  
Javad Sovizi ◽  
Rahul Rai ◽  
Venkat Krovi

In this paper, 3D face recognition under isometric deformation (induced by facial expressions) is considered. The main objective is to employ the shape descriptors that are invariant to (isometric) deformations to provide an efficient face recognition algorithm. Two methods of the correspondence are utilized for automatic landmark assignment to the query face. One is based on the conventional iterative closest point (ICP) method and another is based upon the geometrical/topological features of the human face. The shape descriptor is chosen to be the well-known geodesic distance (GD) measure. The recognition task is performed on SHREC08 database for both correspondence methods and the effect of feature (GD) vector size as well as landmark positions on the recognition accuracy were argued.


Author(s):  
Vandana D. Kaushik ◽  
Aditya Budhwar ◽  
Anuj Dubey ◽  
Rahul Agrawal ◽  
Shraddha Gupta ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1483-1489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Feng SUN ◽  
Heng-Liang TANG ◽  
Bao-Cai YIN

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Song ◽  
Jing Luo ◽  
Chunyuan Zi ◽  
Huixin Tian

Curvelet transform can describe the signal by multiple scales, and multiple directions. In order to improve the performance of 3D face recognition algorithm, we proposed an Anthropometric and Curvelet features fusion-based algorithm for 3D face recognition (Anthropometric Curvelet Fusion Face Recognition, ACFFR). First, the eyes, nose, and mouth feature regions are extracted by the Anthropometric characteristics and curvature features of the human face. Second, Curvelet energy features of the facial feature regions at different scales and different directions are extracted by Curvelet transform. At last, Euclidean distance is used as the similarity between template and objectives. To verify the performance, the proposed algorithm is compared with Anthroface3D and Curveletface3D on the Texas 3D FR database. The experimental results have shown that the proposed algorithm performs well, with equal error rate of 1.75% and accuracy of 97.0%. The algorithm we proposed in this paper has better robustness to expression and light changes than Anthroface3D and Curveletface3D.


2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1483-1489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Feng SUN ◽  
Heng-Liang TANG ◽  
Bao-Cai YIN

Author(s):  
Akihiro HAYASAKA ◽  
Koichi ITO ◽  
Takafumi AOKI ◽  
Hiroshi NAKAJIMA ◽  
Koji KOBAYASHI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document