Model-based cone-beam CT reconstruction for image-guided minimally invasive treatment of hip osteolysis

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Otake ◽  
J. W. Stayman ◽  
W. Zbijewski ◽  
R. J. Murphy ◽  
M. D. Kutzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Model Based

scholarly journals 4D Cone-beam CT reconstruction using a motion model based on principal component analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 6697-6709 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Staub ◽  
Alen Docef ◽  
Robert S. Brock ◽  
Constantin Vaman ◽  
Martin J. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Motion Model ◽  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Model Based

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Spinal Navigation in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Feasibility, Technique, and Initial Results

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Park
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Navigation System ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disk Space ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Spinal Navigation

Abstract BACKGROUND As with most minimally invasive spine procedures, lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) requires the use of biplanar fluoroscopy for localization and safe interbody cage placement. Computed tomography (CT)-based intraoperative spinal navigation has been shown to be more effective than fluoroscopic guidance for posterior-based approaches such as pedicle screw instrumentation. However, the use of spinal navigation in LLIF has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE To present the technique for using an intraoperative cone-beam CT and image-guided navigation system in LLIF and to provide a preliminary analysis of outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively acquired database and the electronic records of patients undergoing LLIF with spinal navigation. Eight patients were identified. Postoperative neurological deficits were recorded. All patients underwent postprocedural CT and x-ray imaging for analysis of accuracy of cage placement. Accuracy of cage placement was determined by location within the disk space. RESULTS The mean age was 66 years, and 6 patients were women. A mean 2.8 levels were treated with a total of 22 lateral cages implanted via navigation. All cages were placed within quarters 1 to 2 or 2 to 3, signifying the anterior half or middle portions of the disk space. There were no sensory or motor deficits postoperatively. CONCLUSION Use of an intraoperative cone-beam CT with an image-guided navigation system is feasible and safe and appears to be accurate, although a larger study is required to confirm these results.

Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Due to Embolic Disease

2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 312-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Ángel de Gregorio ◽  
Alicia Laborda ◽  
Rosario Ortas ◽  
Teresa Higuera ◽  
Javier Gómez-Arrue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial

scholarly journals Image-guided minimally invasive treatment for small renal cell carcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miltiadis E. Krokidis ◽  
Panagiotis Kitrou ◽  
Stavros Spiliopoulos ◽  
Dimitrios Karnabatidis ◽  
Konstantinos Katsanos
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Image Guided

scholarly journals Prospective Randomized Trial for Image-Guided Biopsy Using Cone-Beam CT Navigation Compared with Conventional CT

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1342-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh ◽  
Teresa Fisher ◽  
John Jacobus ◽  
Marlene Skopec ◽  
Alessandro Radaelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Prospective Randomized Trial ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Guided Biopsy ◽  
Conventional Ct

scholarly journals EAU, AUA and NICE Guidelines on Surgical and Minimally Invasive Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Critical Appraisal of the Guidelines Using the AGREE-II Tool

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Dmitry Enikeev ◽  
Vincent Misrai ◽  
Enrique Rijo ◽  
Roman Sukhanov ◽  
Denis Chinenov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Agree Ii ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Assessment Score ◽  
Nice Guideline ◽  
Agree Ii Tool

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To critically appraise the methodological rigour of the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) vis-à-vis BPH surgery as used by specialist research associations in the US, Europe and UK, and to compare whether the guidelines cover all or only some of the available treatments. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The current guidelines issued by the EUA, AUA and NICE associations have been analyzed by 4 appraisers using the AGREE-II instrument. We also compared the recommendations given in the guidelines for surgical and minimally invasive treatment to find out which of these CPGs include most of the available treatment options. <b><i>Results:</i></b> According to the AGREE II tool, the median scores of domains were: domain 1 scope and purpose 66.7%, domain 2 stakeholder involvement 50.0%, domain 3 rigor of development 65.1%, domain 4 clarity of presentation 80.6%, domain 5 applicability 33.3%, domain 6 editorial independence 72.9%. The overall assessment according to AGREE II is 83.3%. The NICE guideline scored highest on 5 out of 6 domains and the highest overall assessment score (91.6%). The EAU guideline scored lowest on 4 out of 6 domains and has the lowest overall assessment score (79.1%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The analyzed CPGs comprehensively highlight the minimally invasive and surgical treatment options for BPH. According to the AGREE II tool, the domains for clarity of presentation and editorial independence received the highest scores. The stakeholder involvement and applicability domains were ranked as the lowest. Improving the CPG in these domains may help to improve the clinical utility and applicability of CPGs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document