scholarly journals Doppler optical microangiography improves the quantification of local fluid flow and shear stress within 3-D porous constructs

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 050504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Jia ◽  
Lin An ◽  
Ruikang K. Wang
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amira Husni Talib ◽  
Ilyani Abdullah ◽  
Nik Nabilah Nik Mohd Naser

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3128
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Coughlin ◽  
Ali Sana ◽  
Kevin Voss ◽  
Abhilash Gadi ◽  
Upal Basu-Roy ◽  
...  

Osteosarcoma (OS) is an aggressive bone cancer originating in the mesenchymal lineage. Prognosis for metastatic disease is poor, with a mortality rate of approximately 40%; OS is an aggressive disease for which new treatments are needed. All bone cells are sensitive to their mechanical/physical surroundings and changes in these surroundings can affect their behavior. However, it is not well understood how OS cells specifically respond to fluid movement, or substrate stiffness—two stimuli of relevance in the tumor microenvironment. We used cells from spontaneous OS tumors in a mouse engineered to have a bone-specific knockout of pRb-1 and p53 in the osteoblast lineage. We silenced Sox2 (which regulates YAP) and tested the effect of fluid flow shear stress (FFSS) and substrate stiffness on YAP expression/activity—which was significantly reduced by loss of Sox2, but that effect was reversed by FFSS but not by substrate stiffness. Osteogenic gene expression was also reduced in the absence of Sox2 but again this was reversed by FFSS and remained largely unaffected by substrate stiffness. Thus we described the effect of two distinct stimuli on the mechanosensory and osteogenic profiles of OS cells. Taken together, these data suggest that modulation of fluid movement through, or stiffness levels within, OS tumors could represent a novel consideration in the development of new treatments to prevent their progression.


1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Nicolella ◽  
Eugene Sprague ◽  
Lynda Bonewald

Abstract It has been shown that bone cells are more responsive to fluid flow induced shear stress as compared to applied substrate strain (Owan, et al., 1997, Smalt, et al., 1997). Using novel micromechanical analysis techniques, we have measured individual cell strains resulting from 10 minutes of continuous fluid flow at a flow rate that produces a shear stress of 15 dyne/cm2. Individual cell strains varied widely from less than 1.0% to over 25% strain within the same group of cells. The increased sensitivity of cells to fluid flow induced shear stress may be attributed to much greater cellular deformations resulting from fluid flow induced sheer stress.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Akbari ◽  
Griffin B. Spychalski ◽  
Miles M. Menyhert ◽  
Kaushik K. Rangharajan ◽  
Shaurya Prakash ◽  
...  

AbstractSphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a blood-borne bioactive lipid mediator of endothelial barrier function. Prior studies have implicated mechanical stimulation due to intravascular laminar shear stress in co-regulating S1P signaling in endothelial cells (ECs). Yet, vascular networks in vivo consist of vessel bifurcations, and this geometry produces hemodynamic forces that are distinct from laminar shear stress. However, the role of these forces at vessel bifurcations in regulating S1P-dependent endothelial barrier function is not known. In this study, we implemented a microfluidic platform that recapitulates the flow dynamics of vessel bifurcations with in situ quantification of the permeability of microvessel analogues. Co-application of S1P with impinging bifurcated fluid flow, which was characterized by approximately zero shear stress and 38 dyn cm-2 stagnation pressure at the vessel bifurcation point, promotes vessel stabilization. Similarly, co-treatment of carrier-free S1P with 3 dyn cm-2 laminar shear stress is also protective of endothelial barrier function. Moreover, it is shown that vessel stabilization due to laminar shear stress, but not bifurcated fluid flow, is dependent on S1P receptor 1 or 2 signaling. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the endothelium-protective function of fluid forces at vessel bifurcations and their involvement in coordinating S1P-dependent regulation of vessel permeability.


Biomechanisms ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (0) ◽  
pp. 99-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi HIROSE ◽  
Akio TANABE ◽  
Kazuo TANISHITA

Micromachines ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Akbari ◽  
Griffin B. Spychalski ◽  
Kaushik K. Rangharajan ◽  
Shaurya Prakash ◽  
Jonathan W. Song

Sprouting angiogenesis—the infiltration and extension of endothelial cells from pre-existing blood vessels—helps orchestrate vascular growth and remodeling. It is now agreed that fluid forces, such as laminar shear stress due to unidirectional flow in straight vessel segments, are important regulators of angiogenesis. However, regulation of angiogenesis by the different flow dynamics that arise due to vessel branching, such as impinging flow stagnation at the base of a bifurcating vessel, are not well understood. Here we used a recently developed 3-D microfluidic model to investigate the role of the flow conditions that occur due to vessel bifurcations on endothelial sprouting. We observed that bifurcating fluid flow located at the vessel bifurcation point suppresses the formation of angiogenic sprouts. Similarly, laminar shear stress at a magnitude of ~3 dyn/cm2 applied in the branched vessels downstream of the bifurcation point, inhibited the formation of angiogenic sprouts. In contrast, co-application of ~1 µm/s average transvascular flow across the endothelial monolayer with laminar shear stress induced the formation of angiogenic sprouts. These results suggest that transvascular flow imparts a competing effect against bifurcating fluid flow and laminar shear stress in regulating endothelial sprouting. To our knowledge, these findings are the first report on the stabilizing role of bifurcating fluid flow on endothelial sprouting. These results also demonstrate the importance of local flow dynamics due to branched vessel geometry in determining the location of sprouting angiogenesis.


1971 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1129-1130
Author(s):  
E. M. Aristov ◽  
B. A. Pavlovskii ◽  
S. F. Yuras

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document