Beam Damage of Poly(2-chloroethyl methylacrylate) [PCEMA] Films as Observed by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy at 143 K, 303 K, and 373 K

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Engelhard ◽  
Don Baer ◽  
Scott Lea
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Engelhard ◽  
Abhilash Krishna ◽  
Pranita Kulkarni ◽  
Chi-Ying Lee ◽  
Don Baer

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-167
Author(s):  
M. H. Engelhard ◽  
A. Krishna ◽  
P. Kulkarni ◽  
C. Y. Lee ◽  
D. R. Baer

Author(s):  
D. A. Carpenter ◽  
M. A. Taylor

The development of intense sources of x rays has led to renewed interest in the use of microbeams of x rays in x-ray fluorescence analysis. Sparks pointed out that the use of x rays as a probe offered the advantages of high sensitivity, low detection limits, low beam damage, and large penetration depths with minimal specimen preparation or perturbation. In addition, the option of air operation provided special advantages for examination of hydrated systems or for nondestructive microanalysis of large specimens.The disadvantages of synchrotron sources prompted the development of laboratory-based instrumentation with various schemes to maximize the beam flux while maintaining small point-to-point resolution. Nichols and Ryon developed a microprobe using a rotating anode source and a modified microdiffractometer. Cross and Wherry showed that by close-coupling the x-ray source, specimen, and detector, good intensities could be obtained for beam sizes between 30 and 100μm. More importantly, both groups combined specimen scanning with modern imaging techniques for rapid element mapping.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document